squeal on a rat thread

[ber]

So should people be entitled to an explanation as to why reviews are ratted???

These don't say why.............

Or is it just me being "curious".................

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 013002 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012987 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012984 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Note - All information correct at time of posting............

definitely i think they are entitled to a reason i could be wrong but up to now i think a reason
was given obviously if u are accused of something u are entitled to know on what grounds

[ninebythree]

So should people be entitled to an explanation as to why reviews are ratted???

These don't say why.............

Or is it just me being "curious".................

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 013002 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012987 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012984 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Note - All information correct at time of posting............

As for the first reviewer that was ratted , i think nicole says quite clearly on his second review that he registered as agency/escort

as for the second reveiwer , i will look it to it tomorrow for you, if it bothers you so much


nbt

[ninebythree]

As for the first reviewer that was ratted , i think nicole says quite clearly on his second review that he registered as agency/escort.

nbt

i should have said ad staff above instead of nicole


nbt

[pats bodyguard]

Thats another thing, how would ye distinguish lies, from what a regular poster was saying and what an escort says?

by listening to what both have to say and asking for clarification as to anything that doesnt make sense

[pats bodyguard]

So should people be entitled to an explanation as to why reviews are ratted???

These don't say why.............

Or is it just me being "curious".................


Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012987 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies


Note - All information correct at time of posting............

tippman2 registered the same day as his 2 reviews. on the same day there were fake reviews for sara from jockster Reviews of Irish escorts written by Irish escort client Jockster - Escort Ireland

After reading all the postive reviews of Sara i just had to see if they were for real and boy they sure are. Sara met me at the door wearing a real sexy short dress and we hit it off staight away, she is so friendly, was offered shower and drink and then it was onto the main event which was awesome, she really knows how to tease a guy and her oral is amazing, nice chat afterwards about different topics, hit the shower again and then i was off home dreaming about my next meeting with this princess,

and a fake from pivoman Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 012947 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Rang Sara last night and she said she could see me staight away which was great. The service was everything i have come to expect from Sara, she has a great attitude for this bizness and is so nice & friendly, in fact for me she is like a good wine, she just gets better with time and i will contine to visit Sara when she is in Dublin.

quote from Sarah

Minstralman,Jockster and Pivoman shares IP after checking Jockster account. As there is conection between them reviewing Sara, their reviews seems to be fake.

bearing this in mind is it any wonder we were suspicious of tippman2:?
__________

[pats bodyguard]

definitely i think they are entitled to a reason i could be wrong but up to now i think a reason
was given obviously if u are accused of something u are entitled to know on what grounds

fair enough ber, obviously i cant put in a full explanation of why i,m suspicious like in the case of click on this thread.

i,ll put in a note like *suspicious, please contact review mod* or whatevers relevent to each case

[ber]

fair enough ber, obviously i cant put in a full explanation of why i,m suspicious like in the case of click on this thread.

i,ll put in a note like *suspicious, please contact review mod* or whatevers relevent to each case

yes i think that is an acceptable compromise gives the reviewer a chance to explain his side
and obviously if he reviews he logs on so should see see any message he gets i would just
go further and say he should be contacted by pm if he dosent respond in a reasonable time
frame i think that tells its oiwn story.yes and also if there is one u have a doubt and are trying
to establish the facts u could put something like under investigation

[carlos marvado]

A new legal paradigm: Guilty until proven innocent?

[pats bodyguard]

A new legal paradigm: Guilty until proven innocent?

well, suspicious until proved otherwise. the punters on this site deserve a harder line taken to weed out the fakes.

[ber]

A new legal paradigm: Guilty until proven innocent?

Yes sorry to say it has come to that but the review system is so flawed that i think an
attitude of that if the review is any way doubtful the onus will be on the reviewer to give
extra imformation to satisfy the review mods
Ithink any genuine reviewer will have no problem with this Icertainly havent and also
i think the ladies would be in favour