we are now fairly up to date with present reviews.
we can now retro edit and or rat past reviews. although finding suspects is made more difficult at the minute because it doesnt have links or even ref no,s to each name. it therefore involves opening many tabs and much researching.
so in order to help us try to sort out the previous possible fakes we need you to squeal on possible fakes.
clues that can point to fakes are
1. reading like an advert more than a review.
2. inconsistent with previous reviews
3. reviewer joining that day
4 reviewer having a history of unusual reviews
5. a bad review in responce to a no of good ones or visa versa.
anyone that has anything to report please provide links to your evidence
mods would you please stop any pissing on this thread, thanks
good hunting lads