Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Option 3: Opt In, Lock In.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York City - Visit me in the USA!
    Posts
    1,894

    Thumbs up Option 3: Opt In, Lock In.

    In my opinion and observations, the review system has been and still is being abused. Some escorts are very good but often reviews are written as a form of bullying or revenge. For instance an escort says no to someone, that she will not see him for whatever reason. That person can then write a review on her and get his revenge for being rejected. This happens often, even here in USA. There in Ireland, you have the problem with pimps "owning" counties, and when an independent tours there, she is threatened to leave or else... can u guess?..... the pimp will write nasty reviews on her to kill her biz. The review system is a catch 22. If the reviews are genuine, then it is helpful to both the punter and the escort. But when the review system is being used as a tool to bully or get revenge, then it is a really fucking bad thing!

    What would be nice is if there was a third option that Patricia might consider:
    1. Opt out
    2. Opt in
    3. Opt in, lock in --- (Which means, the escort opts into review system, and when she feels she has enough reviews to prove she is genuine, good, reliable..... then she could "Lock In" which means the reviews stick to her profile but no more reviews are being accepted.)

    This option would help both punter and escort. As an escort gets famous over time, more and more people will mess with her reviews, making it confusing to the punter readers and also very stressful to the escort to see all her hard work being unraveled by a few bastards who are messing around with a very serious thing: her reputation. By locking in, she can just focus on making her clients happy and letting her fame sorta sit neutral a bit, making her less a target for bullies. When she feels it is the time again, she can "Lock Out" and reviews will then be accepted and added to the earlier reviews. This will show she is still in the same form as before: service, looks, accessibility, ect.

    As it is, when I return to Ireland, I can see the benefit of opting out of the review system. If an escort is too famous, it makes her a target in the review system. Word of mouth can be more powerful then reviews. For me, if there was this option 3: Opt in, Lock in, Lock out..... That would be my desired choice.

    I hope E-I will consider this option, as it will benefit punters and escorts and keep the review system more untainted and reliable.
    Last edited by DollyDarling; 02-07-09 at 22:29.

  2. #2

    Default

    What would stop the escorts from abusing this in order to prevent genuine negative reviews?

    If a gentleman has had a genuinely negative experience with an escort she may decide to head him off at the pass by locking her reviews before he has had time to post.

    I feel that this is unfair to genuine clients.

  3. #3

    Default

    The lock in wouldn't work in my opinion the escort could get have a dip in form and we would be none the wiser. To be honest there is never going to be a perfect system.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York City - Visit me in the USA!
    Posts
    1,894

    Default

    I think it could work a few ways:

    Patricia assigns a certain number of reviews to be had before escort can lock in. This way the reviews are at the start of her career and give a base idea on her service, attitude, looks, ect. At the start of an escorts career, she will mostly likely not suffer review bullies and pimps harassment. The trouble starts usually after she is getting well known. If there is an assigned number of reviews an escort must reach before she locks in, that will give the punter an adequate idea on what she is about. During the lock in time, her business will come based on these reviews she has gathered and by word of mouth.
    Next step Lock Out: Patricia could assign a certain amount of time she can stay in lock in status before she can lock out again. Or there could be a few options: Lock out 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year. If she is locked in for more then 1 year, then it could work a few ways: 1 year mark, escort must either lock out and be opted into reviews and start adding them to her former reviews, or she can decide to opt out of the review system and therfore loses her existing reviews, so that others wont go on reviews from 1 year ago.
    Then after a certain amount of time or number of reviews, the escort can have option to Lock In again... and so forth....
    I think it could work, if everyone gives ideas and input to this and we vote on options. I think it could be a very good system to bring to E-I, escorts, and punters.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York City - Visit me in the USA!
    Posts
    1,894

    Default

    Like I said, an idea starts at something, but to come into existence, there needs to be tweaking. It can work. For instance, say the rule is made on how many reviews she must gather before she can Lock In. Then she has option to stay Locked In for 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months and then must either Lock Out and accept reviews again, or must Opt out of review system and lose her existing reviews.
    But you are right, she could go to shits while she is Locked In, so I would suggest Patricia assigns one person who has as their sole job and purpose in life to:
    There on her review page is a link to make complaint. If there are continuous complaints on the service of this escort, then it could be investigated by this sole person assigned to the task of it. The complaints however would have to come from people who have not just registered, as we see happening so often by trolls. Members of the board who have been here awhile, could alway speak up as well on a girl who is cheating the Lock In system. If she is found to be a fraud, then she must Lock out early, or opt out of review system.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    What if you had to register to be a reviewer, exchange some details with E-I and for that you could be paid a small amount. This would also be an incentive for people to review and put a bit of effort into it. If you're a genuine, honest, god-fearing punter you've nothing to lose. None of the girls would know who they were.

    But what if the punter told the girls he was a reviewer so they would give exceptional service and do everything he wanted? What if someone who wanted to destroy the girl registers like that?

    Patricia could have secret "undercover" girls that are hopefully uncorruptable to test out the punter to see if he's genuine and honest or not. If he's not honest, then E-I withdraw all rights the person has about their personal identification and figures out a way to damage his/her own business (eg. go to the police, complain to hotel). Scumbags would also have an important job to do by pretending to girls they were the reviewers... that way the girls wouldn't know who was and who wasn't (well, except maybe by appearance and manner).

    Obviously this won't ever be done, I'm not sure why I even bothered typing it...
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 03-07-09 at 04:22.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Over There
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice View Post
    What if you had to register to be a reviewer, exchange some details with E-I and for that you could be paid a small amount. This would also be an incentive for people to review and put a bit of effort into it. If you're a genuine, honest, god-fearing punter you've nothing to lose. None of the girls would know who they were.

    But what if the punter told the girls he was a reviewer so they would give exceptional service and do everything he wanted? What if someone who wanted to destroy the girl registers like that?

    Patricia could have secret "undercover" girls that are hopefully uncorruptable to test out the punter to see if he's genuine and honest or not. If he's not honest, then E-I withdraw all rights the person has about their personal identification and figures out a way to damage his/her own business (eg. go to the police, complain to hotel). Scumbags would also have an important job to do by pretending to girls they were the reviewers... that way the girls wouldn't know who was and who wasn't (well, except maybe by appearance and manner).

    Obviously this won't ever be done, I'm not sure why I even bothered typing it...
    Meanwhile 3 years later nicegirls FIRST review has still not arrived.

    Why don't you type up your first review instead
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice View Post
    What if you had to register to be a reviewer, exchange some details with E-I and for that you could be paid a small amount. This would also be an incentive for people to review and put a bit of effort into it. If you're a genuine, honest, god-fearing punter you've nothing to lose. None of the girls would know who they were.

    But what if the punter told the girls he was a reviewer so they would give exceptional service and do everything he wanted? What if someone who wanted to destroy the girl registers like that?

    Patricia could have secret "undercover" girls that are hopefully uncorruptable to test out the punter to see if he's genuine and honest or not. If he's not honest, then E-I withdraw all rights the person has about their personal identification and figures out a way to damage his/her own business (eg. go to the police, complain to hotel). Scumbags would also have an important job to do by pretending to girls they were the reviewers... that way the girls wouldn't know who was and who wasn't (well, except maybe by appearance and manner).

    Obviously this won't ever be done, I'm not sure why I even bothered typing it...
    LMFAO....nicegirls, I thought I was the one with the monopoly of hairbrained schemes around here...but I would take my hat off to you, if I had one.....you can come up with some howlers too Brother.

    "If you're a genuine, honest, god-fearing punter you've nothing to loose"......true, if you exclude your soul, the wrath of the God you fear and eternal damnation.....but shit, that's a small price to pay for a good shag.

    "Patricia could have secret "undercover" girls that are hopefully uncorruptable to test out the punter to see if he's genuine and honest or not",.......you're right nicegirls, this wont ever happen, because controlling the activities of someone engaged in prostitution is against the law. However, there would be nothing to stop Patricia engaging the services of a "retired punter", with a lot of experience under his belt......or at least down there in that general direction, to visit each advertised escort and ascertain the accuracy of the photos, the in-call location, that the services advertised are all on offer and to gauge the general standard of the service provision, and then submit an "expert field report"...............................a sort of star system, like the Michelin star guide.

    Forget it nicegirls, my application is already on Patricia's desk................and I'm under it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the cupboard in mummys bedsit
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Meanwhile 3 years later nicegirls FIRST review has still not arrived.

    Why don't you type up your first review instead
    ducky nicegirls is still trying to write a review of his 1st wank

    so far hes maged to come up with a cartoon..


  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    At home
    Posts
    22,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice View Post
    What if you had to register to be a reviewer, exchange some details with E-I and for that you could be paid a small amount. This would also be an incentive for people to review and put a bit of effort into it. If you're a genuine, honest, god-fearing punter you've nothing to lose. None of the girls would know who they were.

    But what if the punter told the girls he was a reviewer so they would give exceptional service and do everything he wanted? What if someone who wanted to destroy the girl registers like that?

    Patricia could have secret "undercover" girls that are hopefully uncorruptable to test out the punter to see if he's genuine and honest or not. If he's not honest, then E-I withdraw all rights the person has about their personal identification and figures out a way to damage his/her own business (eg. go to the police, complain to hotel). Scumbags would also have an important job to do by pretending to girls they were the reviewers... that way the girls wouldn't know who was and who wasn't (well, except maybe by appearance and manner).

    Obviously this won't ever be done, I'm not sure why I even bothered typing it...
    You are definatly the funniest fucker on here. undercover escorts, like something oout of a bond movie,brilliant
    Join the E-I Fantasy Football League

    http://www.escort-ireland.com/boards...ntasy-Football

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •