Multiple Reviews of Same Girl

[Chocoman]

Hi there

Just want to highlight an issue where i have submitted a few reviews of the same girl (Sara) They are honest reviews and reflect exactly what happened on each meeting. I have been visiting Sara for 6mths now and I like to write review after each encounter as it is always happy experience for me. I. Webmaster suspects i am promoting this girl but i am not. I don't think its fair either to myself or Sara that these reviews be labelled as fake (Sarah smells a rat etc). Until now I was not aware of a limit in terms of how many time a punter can review a girl and I have agreed with Webmaster not to write any more reviews of this girl but still Webmaster refuses to accept this and insists on labelling the reviews as Fake. I feel it is unfair both to myself and especically to the girl in question as the fake reviews label damages her good reputation

What do other punters feel about this situation?

[luther]

Chocoman I see your point of view on this and I agree if you are a genuine punter and reviewer it does seem a little unfair to both parties involved but I'm sure you can also see this from the point of view of the staff who deal with the reviews.........
They see you with 12 reviews and 11 are of the same girl it does look a little suspicious.......
I think it's one of those situations where it's difficult for staff to make a call on..........
If they mark the reviews of a genuine reviewer with a rat then the reviewer feels it's not fair but if there's nothing done about it then in all probability someone else will notice it and complain that these reviews are fake and that you are promoting the girl and tha staff didn't even notice.....

I'm sure you can see this point of view also...........

[Stewie]

Personally I think you went overboard a couple of reviews for the same girl is fine but 11 out of 12 is too much. I think that Sarah was right to highlight it.

[Lynne]

Thought i'd give some input from a ladies point of view:

I would say that i'm sure the lady would be very appreciative of you writing her so many complimentary reviews.

However saying that, to the moderators and to those who read reviews with the intention of booking a lady, i would say that it would look a bit suspect. A couple or perhaps even at a push 3 or 4 over a period of time would have sufficed, but not as many as 12. It just looks dodgy.

This was however perhaps done in innocence and naivity.

[BruceAlmighty]

How about some consistancy then? While I am not doubting their reviews, surely if the same rules are applied, then the reviews by zardoz00 and Dirty Harry (13 times and 9 times respectively) of Jasmin should be marked? Surely my own multiple reviews of Carmen and Malena should be marked?

IMO, if a guy is prepared to pay many times to see the same girl, that does not equal falsehood. Without getting too much up on a high-horse, how about innocent until proved guilty?

Anyways, I've seen Sara twice and am happy to confirm that she is fantastic - surely that is the most important thing here????

[Anna23]

If everyone will do it like this then Pat will need to hire at least a hundred people more to process it and if my regulars start to leave a review for each session then I will not have to pay for advertising ever again.

[Stewie]

How about some consistancy then? While I am not doubting their reviews, surely if the same rules are applied, then the reviews by zardoz00 and Dirty Harry (13 times and 9 times respectively) of Jasmin should be marked? Surely my own multiple reviews of Carmen and Malena should be marked?

IMO, if a guy is prepared to pay many times to see the same girl, that does not equal falsehood. Without getting too much up on a high-horse, how about innocent until proved guilty?

Anyways, I've seen Sara twice and am happy to confirm that she is fantastic - surely that is the most important thing here????

I would imagine that the defence would be that in percentage terms chocoman reviews 90%+ are for the same girl compare to about 50% and 75% in the 2 cases you highlighted. That said I do think that level of revieles distorts the review system. That escort is the joint top reviewed escort here yet over 25% of her reviews are from just 2 people.

Perhaps there should be an actual limit of 4 or 5 max reviews from one client for the same escort we don't need to know about every single visit.

[Chocoman]

Yes i completley agree there should be a limit on the number of reviews a girl can get from one punter and the system should state this clearly but it doesn't. OK so i went a bit overboard, what harm is done here?
To tag all my reviews as fake i believe is very unfair to me but especially to escort Sara
Just one important point, webmaster gave me a warning after my last review that any future reviews would be tagged as fake. That was fine apart from the fact that all my reviews were then tagged as fake eventhough i was perfectly happy to agree with their request....makes no sense to me

[luther]

As a compromise, could some of your reviews be removed and the remainder be un-ratted???

[Chocoman]

Good suggestion Luther, in fact i even said this to wemaster Sarah already but she insists on leaving all reviews as fake. I would have no problems with webmaster removing some of my reviews and leaving the others as unrated,....my big objection here is calling every single review of Sara that i wrote as fake which i think is very unfair to Sara