Ahem!
I totally agree. It's a review of a review with no transparency as to who or why it was liked or disliked.
Needs to be knocked on the head.
Ahem!
I totally agree. It's a review of a review with no transparency as to who or why it was liked or disliked.
Needs to be knocked on the head.
Well something big finally happened.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Shalom/salaam.
10,000 years of Middle Eastern civilisation and the place is not at peace but rather in pieces.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Shalom/salaam.
10,000 years of Middle Eastern civilisation and the place is not at peace but rather in pieces.
KnickerSnifferDublin2016 (25-11-16)
Why then not bring it up a notch or two ?
A review of the review of the review ? ...............
The ability to give a thumbs up or down to the thumbs up or down and perhaps the opportunity to interject a few thanks and you're welcomes in between ?
Limit the reviews of reviews to no more than seventeen, that should make it easy to follow and limit the opportunity for misuse !!!
Mr Sweet Guy (28-11-16), tom rambo (27-11-16)