Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 104

Thread: Rachel Divine?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,108
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    It,s obvious something happened in the private forum for the escorts so why get banned on the general forum
    If there is an argument between escorts in the private then let them rip as nothing to do with here or if you want to do a ban then ban in the private forum and not in the open forum.
    She should be allowed to post here imho


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Please refrain from making comments, especially where the user will not be able to defend herself.

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LuckyLu For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserIrishDaisie69 (17-10-16), LLLLL (17-10-16), tom rambo (17-10-16)

  4. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willie wacker View Post
    It,s obvious something happened in the private forum for the escorts so why get banned on the general forum
    If there is an argument between escorts in the private then let them rip as nothing to do with here or if you want to do a ban then ban in the private forum and not in the open forum.
    She should be allowed to post here imho
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,108
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sevenjamesons View Post
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to willie wacker For This Useful Post:

    anon361 (17-10-16), Floki (17-10-16), Escort AdvertiserIrishDaisie69 (17-10-16), Melindablondey (17-10-16), sevenjamesons (17-10-16)

  7. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sevenjamesons View Post
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.
    Quote Originally Posted by willie wacker View Post
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.
    What a pair of trolls


  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Floki For This Useful Post:

    joggon (17-10-16), Super ModeratorTheNightShift (18-10-16)

  9. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Seemingly it was in the private section that the offence was committed. The ban is currently permenant. The offence was brining up information regarding the ownership of this site that is common knowledge in the public media.
    Last edited by JAMESCORK; 17-10-16 at 18:17.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    willie wacker (17-10-16)

  11. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14,384
    Reviews
    281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Seemingly it was in the private section that the offence was committed. The ban is currently permanent. The offence was brining up information regarding the ownership of this site that is common knowledge in the public media.
    She will be back in time for Hallowe'en.

  12. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveB View Post
    She will be back in time for Hallowe'en.
    Well I'm lead to believe it's a perm. I don't see the content of her spat with the female mod merits a perm. Maybe it will be discussed and she'll be back.

  13. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willie wacker View Post
    What utter incoherent pandering nonsense.
    ^^^^^^^^
    Doesn't know the transgression yet feels qualified to comment on repercussions. Hilarious.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to sevenjamesons For This Useful Post:

    joggon (17-10-16)

  15. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Well I'm lead to believe it's a perm. I don't see the content of her spat with the female mod merits a perm. Maybe it will be discussed and she'll be back.
    given your own terrible judgement, manifested in your numerous indiscretions are you really the best person to comment? After all you did consider it acceptable to invade the privacy of another poster so your opinion on what merits a ban is probably not qualified.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to sevenjamesons For This Useful Post:

    joggon (17-10-16)

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •