Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: rule change

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    554
    Reviews
    18

    Default rule change

    with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered
    Last edited by Zander; 13-09-16 at 10:55.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    315
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zander View Post
    with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered
    Most ? Please explain yourself. A certain amount of "unverified" photos yes but these girls are innocent till proven guilty so an unverified photo does not equal a "fake" photo.
    I have seen profiles of girls with verified photos but someone has reported them as fake and i know the girl and have visited her and it is her in the photos.
    The team here are doing a great job under very difficult circumstances give them a break.

  3. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ass Hunter For This Useful Post:

    Floki (13-09-16), gameboy (13-09-16), LuckyLu (13-09-16), Sophie69 (13-09-16), TonyB (13-09-16), willie wacker (13-09-16)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,737
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zander View Post
    with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

    When you stay you encourage the behaviour. If people walked away every time a bait and switch happened, guess what? It wouldn't be profitable to do bait and switch any more.
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...-Bastard-story

    Account abandoned 13/04/2017

    Thanks for the good times.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FatBastard For This Useful Post:

    joggon (13-09-16), LuckyLu (13-09-16), Sexy Sandy 69 (13-09-16)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zander View Post
    with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered
    The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
    The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

    Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
    Leave review.
    We will publish it.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LuckyLu For This Useful Post:

    gameboy (13-09-16), Sexy Sandy 69 (13-09-16)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,109
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ass Hunter View Post
    Most ? Please explain yourself. A certain amount of "unverified" photos yes but these girls are innocent till proven guilty so an unverified photo does not equal a "fake" photo.
    I have seen profiles of girls with verified photos but someone has reported them as fake and i know the girl and have visited her and it is her in the photos.
    The team here are doing a great job under very difficult circumstances give them a break.
    Well said
    All they have to do if they think the photo,s are fake is do a google search, if nothing come,s up then there is a good chance that the pics are not fake.
    The longer you are on the boards/ punting the easier it become,s to see the fake profile,s


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to willie wacker For This Useful Post:

    circumcised guy (13-09-16)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zander View Post
    with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered
    My photos are not fake, they are verified & I am as portrayed in the photos. I think that you will find that escorts who have been advertising for years, are indeed, the girl in the photos. In all fairness, there are girls out there advertising using genuine photos. It's not just the fake photo's that's the problem, there are a lot of girls using 'heavily photo shopped' photos. The heavily photo shopped photo's are easier to spot.

    Sandy x
    In memory of an awesome woman Laura Lee RIP
    It's so difficult to articulate just how much she meant. Inspirational, brave and irreplaceable - our hero.
    Please do what you can for her daughter. Deeply appreciated.
    https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/glasgaelauralee

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Sexy Sandy 69 For This Useful Post:

    gameboy (13-09-16)

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sexy Sandy 69 View Post
    My photos are not fake, they are verified & I am as portrayed in the photos. I think that you will find that escorts who have been advertising for years, are indeed, the girl in the photos. In all fairness, there are girls out there advertising using genuine photos. It's not just the fake photo's that's the problem, there are a lot of girls using 'heavily photo shopped' photos. The heavily photo shopped photo's are easier to spot.

    Sandy x
    That is very true.
    And it is not possible for us to deem them as fake, if they are photo-shopped.

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,391
    Reviews
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyLu View Post
    The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
    The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

    Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
    Leave review.
    We will publish it.
    I never quite see the logic in this.

    Reviews are attached to a profile - not a person. If someone experiences bait and switch on a profile, then a review that indicates that you may walk into bait and switch if you book on the profile is useful.

    I have never walked, and never experienced bait and switch, but I have several times been uncertain in the first few minutes whether itt was the person in the photos - girls frequently look very different, especially those whose faces are concealed in the pictures. It is easy to imagine someone only being certain whether it was the girl pictured when they get a chance to look at the profile again later.

    I don't see the down side of allowing reviews when someone stays. Honest escorts wouldn't get hurt, and clients would get helpful warnings.
    Help Keyla fund her battle with cancer - give what you can spare.

    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to MidlifeCrisis For This Useful Post:

    TonyB (13-09-16)

  15. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,600
    Reviews
    40

    Default

    A problem that comes up with reporting fake pics is that. we report the fake, it gets taken down, and then within a few hours the same pics are in use by the same profile again. Why can the mods not keep any eye, Either physically or electronically on the profiles that have already been reported.?
    Last edited by justfrank44; 13-09-16 at 13:53.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •