Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: British MP paid for the services of male escorts, the Sunday Mirror reports.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14,384
    Reviews
    281

    Default British MP paid for the services of male escorts, the Sunday Mirror reports.

    He has denied this, but who cares one way or another? What he does in his private life is his own business surely?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37269919
    Last edited by SteveB; 04-09-16 at 09:53.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to SteveB For This Useful Post:


  3. Default

    Sure they all do it

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    13,964
    Reviews
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean1986 View Post
    Sure they all do it
    Some of them are straight as a die though.
    Make a beeline for the female escorts.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Shalom/salaam.
    10,000 years of Middle Eastern civilisation and the place is not at peace but rather in pieces.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    13,964
    Reviews
    66

    Default

    Well, as long as he paid and wasn't demanding free Parliamentary Privileges.
    Reliable too, not a timewaster.
    Bound (no potential pun here, didn't read the article) to be re-selected/re-elected.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to alcatel For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    600
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Mr Vaz had opposed government attempts to criminalise the drug. Ministers later announced they would remain within the law.
    His committee is also currently overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws.

    so whats this about?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to kayfay For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14,384
    Reviews
    281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kayfay View Post
    Mr Vaz had opposed government attempts to criminalise the drug. Ministers later announced they would remain within the law.
    His committee is also currently overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws.

    so whats this about?
    Attempt by the Sunday Mirror to undermine his credibility in his position on the committee overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws?
    Surely, best have someone who has direct experience rather than someone whose only experience is what he has read and heard.
    Looks like a “sting” operation rather than a genuine investigation. The Sunday Mirror probably paid the escorts more than Keith Vaz. (Assuming the reports are true)

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to SteveB For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,737
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveB View Post
    Attempt by the Sunday Mirror to undermine his credibility in his position on the committee overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws?
    Surely, best have someone who has direct experience rather than someone whose only experience is what he has read and heard.
    Looks like a “sting” operation rather than a genuine investigation. The Sunday Mirror probably paid the escorts more than Keith Vaz. (Assuming the reports are true)
    The tabloids are the morality police remember. So when the government responds to their decriminalisation positive report it will now always be tainted by these allegations. Not that they'res anything wrong with what he's alleged to have done, but the fact their report recommended looser laws will be seen as him trying to keep himself right.
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...-Bastard-story

    Account abandoned 13/04/2017

    Thanks for the good times.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FatBastard For This Useful Post:

    Cassandra (06-09-16), dave028 (04-09-16)

  13. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveB View Post
    He has denied this, but who cares one way or another? What he does in his private life is his own business surely?
    He said he'd had bareback sex three weeks earlier with an escort and suggested he wanted it this time as well. That's Mrs Vaz business too.

    Quote Originally Posted by FatBastard View Post
    Not that they'res anything wrong with what he's alleged to have done, .
    Apart from anything else he sounds like a shit client. Suggesting bareback sex, grossly underpaying and then joking to them that it's a lot of money where they come from. Suggesting they bring along someone else who wasn't going to be paid. Shit client. It goes without saying the tabloids are scum.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to David Feckem For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    983
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kayfay View Post
    Mr Vaz had opposed government attempts to criminalise the drug. Ministers later announced they would remain within the law.
    His committee is also currently overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws.

    so whats this about?
    Ah sure he was just doing in depth research on the subject the committee was discussing. Fair play to him.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AbidingPond For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    24,997
    Reviews
    82

    Default

    And he has resigned from the committee. Red Ken he should not be judged on one mistake but for all the good work he has done. ONE MISTAKE, probably more like he was caught out once. We all know what the British press is like, if you are in the public eye then your private life is for public viewing. In such a position I think he was very foolish, the press don't give a fuck if you're Mother Teresa ffs. Maybe that's a different thread.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •