Question on standard of escort photos
Do you think the standard of photos on here makes a difference?
For the escorts, did you find with more professional photos that you got more clients and improved your business?
For the punters, do you really care if the escort has got high quality photos or do you not mind so long as they're visible?
I noticed there's a real mix of quality in the photos in the profiles. Some are very amateur and some are very high quality. My photographer brain kicked in and was just curious if people see this as being important or not.
I've always taken my own photo's, but the quality has changed with my own experience and ability. I can't say I have had more or less bookings due to the photo's, but maybe more compliments on the photo's themselves depending on the pose more than the quality. Often the riskier I get, the more attention I get.
I would have thought that accuracy was more important, but of course we do eat with our eyes and imagine the unwrapping of the present, so a little temptation to feast the eyes is likely to get a better result. Some girls have that naturally and don't need to touch it up, where others (like myself) may need to try and include their personality in the photo.
What is your opinion since you brought it up?
too much photoshop, when you get there she looks not near as hot in person, there should be some natural pictures in profile too, mix it up abit girls
Some good points in there alright. Accuracy should be a factor for sure. As a photographer I often spend hours in front of photoshop but thats more for commercial or fashion work. For escorts I don't think anyone really benefits from overly photoshopped images. Plus with good lighting techniques there's ways to get really flattering images without going crazy with the processing.
Personality is always a massive one for me in looking at an image. Its a tough one with escorts though as so many don't want their faces shown which I do understand. Its just tricky to show personality when the face isn't shown in a shot.
Couldn't agree more and strangely enough the girls I would see again and again are carbon copies of their pictures
Originally Posted by giggs
It's gone to the stage with profiles on here that a lad is overwhelmed if he meets an escort and she looks like her pictures as in not airbrushed to death
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Guinness For This Useful Post:
Thats interesting. I'm guessing thats more to do with the quality of service. Probably still ties into the same thing though, that a good escort would know its of no benefit to have photos that look nothing like them in person.
Originally Posted by Arthur Guinness
Rubina Bombshell and Rachel Divine are just two examples of this in my opinion
Originally Posted by imageman81
Just looking at them both now. Definitely good to hear they both look that good in person.
Interesting observation that both have quite a professional standard of images too.
videos are the way forward i have produced professional videos for some escorts and after they uploaded them to their profile their work increased considerable to me this is a no brainer men like to see videos
Tags for this Thread