Better for whom?Originally Posted by TonyB
Yes, yes she is Rachel. More is better
But on a serious note, does it then follow that being more expensive is better.
Better for whom?Yes, yes she is Rachel. More is better
But on a serious note, does it then follow that being more expensive is better.
Anyone who reads the forum knows the review system is in the most part useless and inaccurate. Out of all the posters and reviewers there are probably only 2 or 3 i would take as sound.
Unfortunately even quantity of positive reviews cant be a guarentee, some of my worst meetings have been with escorts with over 100/150 positive reviews.
Its quite often what reviewers DONT say thats important.
I think you can be truthful in a review withoout being rude or offensive. Why people dont re iew honestly, i dont know.
Anitafan (08-08-16)
Escort (Non Advertiser)
Certified E-I Addict
Well, was the guy who said she was doing this and that cheap.
Naughty videos on EF.
Escort (Non Advertiser)
Certified E-I Addict
I suppose I have too much self-respect for myself. No offence to anyone.Yes, yes she is Rachel. More is better
But on a serious note, does it then follow that being more expensive is better.
On another note, I never ever gave to someone that more bit because I got paid for it...
Naughty videos on EF.
Arthur Guinness (08-08-16)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Turns heads,looks great , goes like crazy , is reliable and wont let you down.
Its expensive
But worth every penny / cent.
Am I in the right thread
Last edited by xagerate; 08-08-16 at 17:15.
Having recently lost the run of myself.....
....please indicate your level of satisfaction with this post as you exit.
(All feedback is anonymous and used to improve your experience here)
Reviews are extremely subjective. I never understood those that say "she is the best out there, the rest pale compared to her".
Or the alternative. That's one opinion of one person, at a particular point in time, in a particular set of circumstances.
And what many punters fail to understand is that the outcome of an appointment is 50% dependent on them.
Arianna (09-08-16), Best Before (09-08-16), gameboy (09-08-16), Irish Fiona (09-08-16), LuckyLu (14-08-16), Rachel Divine (08-08-16), Sexy Samantha British (13-08-16), whoseyourdaddy (08-08-16)
Banned User
spot on. She made you laugh, enjoy yourself and feel welcome. The money was immaterial. 70 or 150 euros, its the attitude that counts. She made you feel like a real friend/lover.
This is my point 100%
It's totally understandable that if the client is in a mood or doesn't put in the effort or isn't clean well then the Escort can't be blamed for a poor appointment.
I always go to an appointment spotless and with a pep in my step as I'm in great form as I'm looking forward to meet a beautiful Lady.
The problem is the couldn't give a shit give me your money attitude and rushed uninterested robotic nature that is out there in certain Escorts and the fact that reviewers are not reporting back on this.
Best Before (09-08-16), blue rebel (08-08-16)
Some peeps are to critical over little things IMHO.[/QUOTE]
I disagree with this Delta and of course you are entitled to your opinion and it is a valid one, but I think perhaps the reason more people are not more honest with their reviews is the face being criticised for it here on the boards by more prolific posters.
Me on the other hand I tend to tell it like it is even do it gets me in to trouble sometimes
Well with over 9,700 posts it looks like you have overcome your fear of the ForumNo it was because I used this site for years and did not bother about the forum and the great advice on here. I mean everybody has a forum nowadays! Like who took notice!!
Bongo (08-08-16)
Posting Permissions
