Unpublished reviews

[Pinkeye]

This could get me into trouble....

Anyway, recently met an escorts with some reviews, but unverified photos. Nice girl had a good time, stated in my review that she wasn't the girl in the photos, but was the girl advertising.

This review wasn't published as I stated, I didnt meet the girl, who was in the photos.

To be honest, I find this to be a bit of a joke, I know this site has rules, and I'm not having a go at the mods, as they are doing this job and it's hard enough as is.

What I was trying to say in my review, which was not a negative one, was that even though she was using someone else's photos she was a nice girl. She doesn't have a lot of reviews, so I presume that other punters fell into the same rules as me, by saying that the girl was not the one in the photos.

Given, the difference between the photos used and the actual girl giving the service, I thought it was only fair to advise fellow punters in my review that they wouldn'tbe meeting the girl in the photos.

Anyway, if you've read this..let me know what you think. Not naming anyone here, just me...

[MidlifeCrisis]

The rules are pretty clear, so no surprise.

If you accept a service from a different girl than the one in the profile, the review is disallowed. From your own description this is what happened - most people would take this to mean different to the girl pictured.

I'm not sure it is a good rule, but they seem to enforce it consistently.

[ilovepussy123]

This could get me into trouble....

Anyway, recently met an escorts with some reviews, but unverified photos. Nice girl had a good time, stated in my review that she wasn't the girl in the photos, but was the girl advertising.

This review wasn't published as I stated, I didnt meet the girl, who was in the photos.

To be honest, I find this to be a bit of a joke, I know this site has rules, and I'm not having a go at the mods, as they are doing this job and it's hard enough as is.

What I was trying to say in my review, which was not a negative one, was that even though she was using someone else's photos she was a nice girl. She doesn't have a lot of reviews, so I presume that other punters fell into the same rules as me, by saying that the girl was not the one in the photos.

Given, the difference between the photos used and the actual girl giving the service, I thought it was only fair to advise fellow punters in my review that they wouldn'tbe meeting the girl in the photos.

Anyway, if you've read this..let me know what you think. Not naming anyone here, just me...

unverified photos or no reviews well its simple no visit

[Floki]

Are are some reason why review may be deleted:
https://www.escort-ireland.com/help/...formation.html

And for your case:
(k) In the event that a client turns up for a booking and accepts a booking from a different escort (i.e. not the escort from the profile), then the right to review has been forfeited. There is an option to review an escort under the category, 'met escort, but left without receiving services', should the booking be declined on this basis. Remember; if you have been fooled this far, don't expect the escort to provide the full list of services on the profile either!

[LuckyLu]

Thank you for posting here.

I explained this to you over our e-mail correspondence, if I remember correctly on Saturday.
I know it seems harsh, but this is one of the tools we use against dishonest advertisers.

We often read that we don't care or not doing enough to stop the fake profiles.
(Fake profiles being, where there is a different girl working than the advert would indicate.)

This is one of the ways we do it. We encourage you to walk away.
If you walk away you send the advertiser a clear and very important message (not your pictures = no deal).

At the same time you will have the right to warn others and leave the review.

This rule is in place for this reason.

And of course you will not get in trouble for posting here. Why would you?
You express yourself in a clear and polite manner, very respectfully and are not breaking any rules.

Please feel free to post in the warning sections, if you wish;
again thank you in advance for not disclosing any information in public.
X

This could get me into trouble....

Anyway, recently met an escorts with some reviews, but unverified photos. Nice girl had a good time, stated in my review that she wasn't the girl in the photos, but was the girl advertising.

This review wasn't published as I stated, I didnt meet the girl, who was in the photos.

To be honest, I find this to be a bit of a joke, I know this site has rules, and I'm not having a go at the mods, as they are doing this job and it's hard enough as is.

What I was trying to say in my review, which was not a negative one, was that even though she was using someone else's photos she was a nice girl. She doesn't have a lot of reviews, so I presume that other punters fell into the same rules as me, by saying that the girl was not the one in the photos.

Given, the difference between the photos used and the actual girl giving the service, I thought it was only fair to advise fellow punters in my review that they wouldn'tbe meeting the girl in the photos.

Anyway, if you've read this..let me know what you think. Not naming anyone here, just me...

[Pinkeye]

Hey Floki/Lucky Lu

Thanks for the responses. I understand where you are both coming from and that the rules are there for are reason. I think I was blowing off steam. Sorry for hassling you with the emails.

Never thought of putting anything into the warning section. It seems a bit harsh.