The lunatics have taken over the aslyum

[nicegirlsarenice]

Thank god BigPaws won't be a mod.

He's a very manipulative shit-stirrer as well.

[pats bodyguard]

Thread moved to soap to allow paws right of reply

[roryman]

I keep in touch with QPH by pms quiet regularly. I have a good idea of the type of man he is. He's an honest man and cares about things. He's too honest and cares too much that's his problem. And his posts are too long What happened between him, bigpaws and Dollys in the past. I think he can be a fair moderator and listen to both sides no matter who it is. Give him a chance like the other moderators. If it works it works, if it doesn't he'd be the first to admit it.

Look, I have nothing against him personally, and he can be quite amusing, even insightful

I am merely pointing out that you can post as many rules as you like and have as many moderators as you like but at the end of the day, if Pat changes her mind or the wind is blowing the other way, then she will see things HER way, so its all a bit nonsense really to pretend otherwise.

to further illustrate

QPH - harrasses an escort, posts personal details - doesnt get banned, gets made a mod
Liz - posts personal details gets perm ban
Bigpaws - harrasses, posts personal details, gets confined to soapland until he amuses Pat again


and there, in a nut shell you have it!

[ninebythree]

Look, I have nothing against him personally, and he can be quite amusing, even insightful

I am merely pointing out that you can post as many rules as you like and have as many moderators as you like but at the end of the day, if Pat changes her mind or the wind is blowing the other way, then she will see things HER way, so its all a bit nonsense really to pretend otherwise.

to further illustrate

QPH - harrasses an escort, posts personal details - doesnt get banned, gets made a mod
Liz - posts personal details gets perm ban
Bigpaws - harrasses, posts personal details, gets confined to soapland until he amuses Pat again


and there, in a nut shell you have it!

Any one remember the vote we had back abit for mods, were any of these people considered.

If u listed the 5 five worse candidates for mods , 2 of the current mods would have topped the list.

In fairness we took the trouble to vote and yet our votes were not considered

nbt

[Quarterpoundher]

You will be amazed at how fair I will be Rory. You see I actually understand what true freedom of speech is. It is granted us by gallant generations long gone but free speech here is bastardized and twisted to suit peoples not very well hidden agenda’s in order to maintain the status quo and paradoxically deny the very rights to others that they claim for themselves.

No longer.

You will note that I have not edited an offensive word to me as if it is your genuinely held opinion of me which you have chosen to wait till now to voice in your anti mod campaign btw as I had thought we to be on good terms but mo matter we live and learn then that does not warrant editing as it is your “opinion”.

You see Rory?, have I trampled on your civil liberties? Ordered the E-I tanks to crush your Prague spring?……..no, as you expressed your view within the current rules and framework, but only just so be mindful of the rules as I will be enforcing them regardless of who they are or who they think they are.

If you are going to do a synopsis on me Rory kindly make it a balanced one and not cherry pick what suits your ends or motives and I submit that is rather disingenuous to say the least and do not think for one second that I do not see that I am now the next in line for attention but you are dealing with a very different proposition in me I can assure you and I know full well and have the measure and more then the measure of all of you and will not be rising to the bait but rather will just get on with the task of modding for the benefit of all.

Another fact you choose to ignore is that I defended the right for the very person insulting my family not to have it done to him at the EXACT time he was doing it to me so your argument that I can not be fair or impartial holds about as much water as jack and Jill’s bucket.

It has been said by the anti mod brigade that no Escort or Punter can be fair by the fact that they are on one side of the fence.

Well guess what? I am neither. So if neither party is suitable and someone who is not either is not then that pretty much rules out the entire human population now Rory now does it not?

I have set out my stall with Patricia and she knows where I stand and how I intend to do this and more importantly why I wish to do this. I was greatly heartened by things she said as regards this place being more welcoming to all and is why I wish to contribute in a more concrete way to that end and if in my and the other mods efforts even one Escort or one Client feels they can take part here when before they did not then I will see that as mission accomplished.

I thank her for allowing me this opportunity and will do my utmost not to falter in the faith she has in my abilities.

Thank you for your input Rory and look forward to defending you’re and “all” others right to express themselves within the rightfully wide scope of the rules to which everyone was given ample time to contribute to by Patricia.

If people obey those rules our paths will never cross but break them and they will find me as like a brick wall in front of them.

I will be responding no further as I will not pander to those that denounce me before I even start which is the very embodiment of censorship is it not?

[ber]

In fairness we took the trouble to vote and yet our votes were not considered

nbt[/QUOTE]
Now niner nothing new there wasnt it done for Lisbon treaty aswell

[big daddy 69]

As i remember when the members of this site voted qphs name never came into it only did highways acceptance speach if i remember correctly

Also if i remember correctly carlos was the one everyone could agree on including patricia although he wasnt into the idea...

[ninebythree]

You will be amazed at how fair I will be Rory. You see I actually understand what true freedom of speech is. It is granted us by gallant generations long gone but free speech here is bastardized and twisted to suit peoples not very well hidden agenda’s in order to maintain the status quo and paradoxically deny the very rights to others that they claim for themselves.

No longer.

You will note that I have not edited an offensive word to me as if it is your genuinely held opinion of me which you have chosen to wait till now to voice in your anti mod campaign btw as I had thought we to be on good terms but mo matter we live and learn then that does not warrant editing as it is your “opinion”.

You see Rory?, have I trampled on your civil liberties? Ordered the E-I tanks to crush your Prague spring?……..no, as you expressed your view within the current rules and framework, but only just so be mindful of the rules as I will be enforcing them regardless of who they are or who they think they are.

If you are going to do a synopsis on me Rory kindly make it a balanced one and not cherry pick what suits your ends or motives and I submit that is rather disingenuous to say the least and do not think for one second that I do not see that I am now the next in line for attention but you are dealing with a very different proposition in me I can assure you and I know full well and have the measure and more then the measure of all of you and will not be rising to the bait but rather will just get on with the task of modding for the benefit of all.

Another fact you choose to ignore is that I defended the right for the very person insulting my family not to have it done to him at the EXACT time he was doing it to me so your argument that I can not be fair or impartial holds about as much water as jack and Jill’s bucket.

It has been said by the anti mod brigade that no Escort or Punter can be fair by the fact that they are on one side of the fence.

Well guess what? I am neither. So if neither party is suitable and someone who is not either is not then that pretty much rules out the entire human population now Rory now does it not?

I have set out my stall with Patricia and she knows where I stand and how I intend to do this and more importantly why I wish to do this. I was greatly heartened by things she said as regards this place being more welcoming to all and is why I wish to contribute in a more concrete way to that end and if in my and the other mods efforts even one Escort or one Client feels they can take part here when before they did not then I will see that as mission accomplished.

I thank her for allowing me this opportunity and will do my utmost not to falter in the faith she has in my abilities.

Thank you for your input Rory and look forward to defending you’re and “all” others right to express themselves within the rightfully wide scope of the rules to which everyone was given ample time to contribute to by Patricia.

If people obey those rules our paths will never cross but break them and they will find me as like a brick wall in front of them.

I will be responding no further as I will not pander to those that denounce me before I even start which is the very embodiment of censorship is it not?

I dont think Rorys problem is weither u will be fair or not . His point is that you should have been banned from the site over the dollygate thus shouldnt be consider as a mod.


nbt

[Patricia]

In fairness we took the trouble to vote and yet our votes were not considered

nbt

Now niner nothing new there wasnt it done for Lisbon treaty aswell [/quote]

Actually, I did consider the poll. I offered the opportunity to be a mod to all those people except Epsilon as he had already said he didn't want to be a mod and Mari as I felt he smokes too much weed to be a mod. Highwayman and Kieree said no thanks. Carlos I didn't hear back from. Getting off ski lift now, will be back later...

[luther]

Thread moved to soap to allow paws right of reply

What is the point of this???

It's just a question....... I'm not having a go at Pats bodyguard or Paws but I fail to see the point in maggotting somebody and confining them to soap land as punishment for something and then just moving things in there to facilitate them!!!!

I thought the punishment of being confined to soap land was that they couldn't comment on things elsewhere on the board........

I understand if the thread is about them or if they're being attacked in a thread, then maybe they should be allowed to defend themselves, and I say maybe because in my opinion you forfeit many of your rights if you break the rules and are confined to soap land.... Is this not the point of it????