Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: For Gemma re your post on paws group

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    398

    Default For Gemma re your post on paws group

    Are the moderators supposed to edit such info including info about famalies b4 it is seen by others or if it is in the private escort forum should personal info about an individual be allowed (eg. info on children) no matter what the individual is accused of doing??

    Not impressed with your eg but regardless since mods have lives to live and cant possibly be on 24/7 then it only stands to reason that we can only do our best in any given situation.It only stands to reason that time could elapse before we spot something.

    Now there is also a list of clients numbers.. That is a load of b****x. This is a total invasion of privacy. I pity clients that never got a punting sim

    I find this amazing and here is why.You have joined a group,where the members were invited to join by the founder of that group.You express disgust at the way in which clients details were circulated on a list yet you dont seem to release or see anything wrong with the fact that you have several members on that group who are in fact part of the list of escorts behind the good clients list.Surely if a group founder is serious about the privacy he holds so dear,nonwithstanding the fact that he published private info on a member here before,he would hardly see fit to invite anyone who have breached privacy to join the group.I find your comments in light of this fact to be amazing and contradictary as well.

    The very fact that he created a situation in which private info was published on here leading to mods being needed and then forming a group is pretty double standards.
    Its like forming an alcholics anonymous group and then taking everyone for a pint afterwards.


    Westside.

    PS this is not being posted in the Soap Opera section because its not Soap Opera material.
    Last edited by WTF; 18-02-09 at 01:22. Reason: :-)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Westieeeeeee..

    Why not just PM all this to Gemma? Why does this need an open thread that everyone on the forums can read?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post
    Westieeeeeee..

    Why not just PM all this to Gemma? Why does this need an open thread that everyone on the forums can read?
    Ehh because a public thread allows him to have a pop at Paws



    BTW have to laugh at westie criticising someone elses standard of English given that he uses the word release instead of realise must have got that shitty chinese copy of a guide to good english

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Ehh because a public thread allows him to have a pop at Paws
    So I'm not the only one who thought that...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    398

    Default Thats a fair enough q

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post
    Westieeeeeee..

    Why not just PM all this to Gemma? Why does this need an open thread that everyone on the forums can read?
    the answer is because Gemma posted these on an area for all to see too in a group discussion which can be seen.

    Westside.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    398

    Default Your a clown

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Ehh because a public thread allows him to have a pop at Paws



    BTW have to laugh at westie criticising someone elses standard of English given that he uses the word release instead of realise must have got that shitty chinese copy of a guide to good english
    First off my ketboard is worn.Second off i type fast,real fast.Thirdly your tough talk doesnt impress me any more than paws tough talk does.

    Westside.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    398

    Default A few short weeks ago

    Eh .............. what was that??? - 21-01-09, 10:09 PM

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sexybabehere
    You know NOTHING about me. I have a very select amount of friends on this site. My privacy has nothing got to do with QPH and QPH is forcing nothing on me..

    Gemma

    *removed by patricia*

    Posted by paws.

    Its there in plain English and then he starts a group for protection of privacy and then invites ppl who have being involved in the third scandal in the industry since the late 1990's.

    Comical,
    Westside.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTF View Post
    Are the moderators supposed to edit such info including info about famalies b4 it is seen by others or if it is in the private escort forum should personal info about an individual be allowed (eg. info on children) no matter what the individual is accused of doing??

    Not impressed with your eg but regardless since mods have lives to live and cant possibly be on 24/7 then it only stands to reason that we can only do our best in any given situation.It only stands to reason that time could elapse before we spot something.

    Now there is also a list of clients numbers.. That is a load of b****x. This is a total invasion of privacy. I pity clients that never got a punting sim

    I find this amazing and here is why.You have joined a group,where the members were invited to join by the founder of that group.You express disgust at the way in which clients details were circulated on a list yet you dont seem to release or see anything wrong with the fact that you have several members on that group who are in fact part of the list of escorts behind the good clients list.Surely if a group founder is serious about the privacy he holds so dear,nonwithstanding the fact that he published private info on a member here before,he would hardly see fit to invite anyone who have breached privacy to join the group.I find your comments in light of this fact to be amazing and contradictary as well.

    The very fact that he created a situation in which private info was published on here leading to mods being needed and then forming a group is pretty double standards.
    Its like forming an alcholics anonymous group and then taking everyone for a pint afterwards.


    Westside.

    PS this is not being posted in the Soap Opera section because its not Soap Opera material.
    Good Morning WTF,

    I was not impressed with the info I read in the private escoert forum reguarding a totally innocent person which can put both him and his family in danger. Time before you spot something?? It has been two days now..

    I joined both Modding, respect your right to speech and Modding, respect and your right to privacy. I have posted the exact same comment in both groups. I have received no response in either. You both should just combine your groups and make it Modding, respect, your right to privacy and speech. I did not know what the story was with all of the Moderator threads as I have never read them. Thank you for the brief. I am not defending Paws but was personal information about him not being posted in blogs (don't know who's) recently? I do not agree with personal info on anyone including escorts being posted on this board. I am receiving PMs asking me for personal info about a member. I am not replying nor am I giving any information to anyone. I do not get a kick out of getting to people by posting personal information.

    I do not like the client list as it was only a matter of time before it got out. I am now glad I did not join it. I do not want to be the reason famalies broke up all because escorts felt they needed to inform other escorts who was good. Escorts that wish this should of done what many other escorts do (ask the client to give the name of another escort they were with).

    Are the Mods only modding personal info or anything they feel is not supposed to be on the board??

    Gemma

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTF View Post
    the answer is because Gemma posted these on an area for all to see too in a group discussion which can be seen.

    Westside.

    I have posted it in ur group also. Why not reply to me there so people in the future that have not seen this thread can see your response to me??

    Gemma

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTF View Post
    First off my ketboard is worn.Second off i type fast,real fast.Thirdly your tough talk doesnt impress me any more than paws tough talk does.

    Westside.
    Then why not put it in the Soap Opera?? He can not post here to defend his group.. I know you said it is not soap opera material but I think this whole site is..

    Gemma

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •