For Gemma re your post on paws group

[WTF]

Are the moderators supposed to edit such info including info about famalies b4 it is seen by others or if it is in the private escort forum should personal info about an individual be allowed (eg. info on children) no matter what the individual is accused of doing??

Not impressed with your eg but regardless since mods have lives to live and cant possibly be on 24/7 then it only stands to reason that we can only do our best in any given situation.It only stands to reason that time could elapse before we spot something.

Now there is also a list of clients numbers.. That is a load of b****x. This is a total invasion of privacy. I pity clients that never got a punting sim

I find this amazing and here is why.You have joined a group,where the members were invited to join by the founder of that group.You express disgust at the way in which clients details were circulated on a list yet you dont seem to release or see anything wrong with the fact that you have several members on that group who are in fact part of the list of escorts behind the good clients list.Surely if a group founder is serious about the privacy he holds so dear,nonwithstanding the fact that he published private info on a member here before,he would hardly see fit to invite anyone who have breached privacy to join the group.I find your comments in light of this fact to be amazing and contradictary as well.

The very fact that he created a situation in which private info was published on here leading to mods being needed and then forming a group is pretty double standards.
Its like forming an alcholics anonymous group and then taking everyone for a pint afterwards.


Westside.

PS this is not being posted in the Soap Opera section because its not Soap Opera material.