Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Verified Photos a Joke

  1. #1

    Default Verified Photos a Joke

    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!

    Does anyone know how this verification is done because there are plenty of girls able to take the piss. Tonight I met 3 girls with apparently 'verified' photos and all three were shorter, fatter and frankly way less attractive than the advertised pics.

    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.

    So, what is actually going here? Can EI not think up a better way to get the percentage up a bit? Maybe get out there and do some spot checks. Maybe employ a small team of punters to confidentially report their findings....

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to IronChicken For This Useful Post:

    bonsten (13-06-16)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,467
    Reviews
    195

    Default

    If you are finding that high a percentage of ladies with fake photos you must be doing something wrong.

    Seek ladies that at least allow reviews.
    There are areas of Dublin where fakes are more likely.
    Read between the lines in reviews.
    Pm reviewers

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TonyB For This Useful Post:

    alcatel (11-07-16), rebelscouse (09-06-16), Escort AdvertiserSexy Sandy 69 (04-06-16)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!
    Does anyone know how this verification is done because there are plenty of girls able to take the piss. Tonight I met 3 girls with apparently 'verified' photos and all three were shorter, fatter and frankly way less attractive than the advertised pics.
    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.
    So, what is actually going here? Can EI not think up a better way to get the percentage up a bit? Maybe get out there and do some spot checks. Maybe employ a small team of punters to confidentially report their findings....
    Thank you for bringing this up.
    If you keep browsing the forums you will see that this is an ongoing issue.

    We are an advertising directory, not an agency.
    As such we have got no direct, personal contact with the advertisers.

    Here you can find more information on the verification process,
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/help/faq/photos.html

    We do rely on genuine punters to report back their findings,
    but we cant contribute towards this enterprise, I am afraid.

    If the company would consider doing this in the future, we will keep you informed,
    be aware thou that there is a queue starting with Floki and Jorge, of course.

  6. Default

    Yes, thats not good, what about those that have reviews, is that just as bad?

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    675

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!

    Does anyone know how this verification is done because there are plenty of girls able to take the piss. Tonight I met 3 girls with apparently 'verified' photos and all three were shorter, fatter and frankly way less attractive than the advertised pics.

    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.

    So, what is actually going here? Can EI not think up a better way to get the percentage up a bit? Maybe get out there and do some spot checks. Maybe employ a small team of punters to confidentially report their findings....
    u know u recive what u pay for...
    so if u go for low price thats that u will get...
    fat ugly and older persons
    My advice if u reaaly want a good time is to find a good reviewed girl who speak english with a decent pricee
    and if u see is not the girl in the photos why u dont just go?

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JessycaWild For This Useful Post:

    alcatel (11-07-16), Super ModeratorFloki (11-07-16), hitman76 (03-06-16), j81 (14-06-16), Petros (03-06-16), rebelscouse (08-06-16), Escort AdvertiserSexy Sandy 69 (04-06-16)

  9. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!

    Does anyone know how this verification is done because there are plenty of girls able to take the piss. Tonight I met 3 girls with apparently 'verified' photos and all three were shorter, fatter and frankly way less attractive than the advertised pics.

    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.

    So, what is actually going here? Can EI not think up a better way to get the percentage up a bit? Maybe get out there and do some spot checks. Maybe employ a small team of punters to confidentially report their findings....
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/help/...t-punters.html

  10. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,155
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JessycaWild View Post
    u know u recive what u pay for...
    so if u go for low price thats that u will get...
    fat ugly and older persons
    What a crock of shit but typical of your bad attitude

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    675

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by General Lee Awesome View Post
    What a crock of shit but typical of your bad attitude
    mind your own bussines

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to JessycaWild For This Useful Post:

    alcatel (11-07-16)

  13. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,804
    Reviews
    26

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!
    50% of the ladies you visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? Trust me there is something seriously wrong with your selection process with a fail rate as high as that!

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.
    Hmmmm..... Has the penny dropped yet?



    Quote Originally Posted by JessycaWild View Post
    u know u recive what u pay for...
    so if u go for low price thats that u will get...
    fat ugly and older persons
    My advice if u reaaly want a good time is to find a good reviewed girl who speak english with a decent pricee
    and if u see is not the girl in the photos why u dont just go?
    I think this might shed some light on where your selection process could be going wrong IronChicken



  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Petros For This Useful Post:

    alcatel (11-07-16), hitman76 (03-06-16), rebelscouse (09-06-16)

  15. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Being Naughty xxx
    Posts
    5,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IronChicken View Post
    I've just looked back over my punts over the last year to find that 50% of the 'photos verified' ladies I visited had absolutely no resemblance to the person advertised? It's not reasonable to expect EI to get 100% accuracy, but 50% ??!!

    Does anyone know how this verification is done because there are plenty of girls able to take the piss. Tonight I met 3 girls with apparently 'verified' photos and all three were shorter, fatter and frankly way less attractive than the advertised pics.

    Of course, another thing I've noticed is that the less you pay, the more likely you'll NOT be meeting miss-beautiful.

    So, what is actually going here? Can EI not think up a better way to get the percentage up a bit? Maybe get out there and do some spot checks. Maybe employ a small team of punters to confidentially report their findings....
    If you visit a girl who is not the girl in the photos, you can submit a 'fake photo' report, if you or other punters who have visited the girl, choose not to submit a 'fake photo' report then future punters are none the wiser. As much as I know the verification photo process is open to manipulation, if you don't report fake photos then ei cannot do anything about those advertisers.

    Sandy x
    ~ * ~ Busty UK 100% Independent Fit, Fun & Frisky Escort 086 124 8984~ * ~
    ~ * ~ MONAGHAN Until & including Sunday 10th December ~ * ~
    ~ * ~ WITHHELD/LANDLINE NUMBERS/TEXT MESSAGES & ANY CALLS AFTER 9pm will not be answered ~ * ~
    ~ * ~ Phone sex available by paysafe vouchers only ~ * ~



  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Sexy Sandy 69 For This Useful Post:

    rebelscouse (09-06-16)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •