Unverified Photo, No reviews... do you risk it?

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 09:25

Originally Posted by Petros

I have to agree with the principal of this argument! E-I are basically an advertising window — they do not hire or vet each escort who rocks up to advertise their site. This is just the same as your local free ads paper that is chucked through your door every week were AAA Joe Blogs pluming advertises.

You look in the free ads paper for a plumber — see AAA Joe Blogs pluming and call him up — he arrives and makes a total bollox of the job after charging you a fortune — do you blame the free ads paper for advertising him? They did not recommend him! As the old saying goes, paper never refused ink — especially where money is involved!

Well, that is slightly different from false advertising — that is the same as a young fit size 8 19 year old on the profile and you turn up to find a 50 year old size 20 opening the door — what do you do? — walk away! You don't agree to purchase her services!

A recruitment agency is not an advertising agency. Any reputable recruitment agency will interview and vet those who they "recommend" As you normally pay the agency and not the individual they are responsible for who they send to you. You don't pay E-I to see the ladies.

Apologist.

Nuff said.

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 09:26

Originally Posted by Beast

I liked lvt on the boards and what made her great was she wasn't false and she spoke her mind.

She had a touch of ocd, imo.

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 09:29

Originally Posted by Rachel Divine

Someone talking more sense than many here ... x

Fawning......

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 10:03

Originally Posted by Petros

I have to agree with the principal of this argument! E-I are basically an advertising window — they do not hire or vet each escort who rocks up to advertise their site. This is just the same as your local free ads paper that is chucked through your door every week were AAA Joe Blogs pluming advertises.

You look in the free ads paper for a plumber — see AAA Joe Blogs pluming and call him up — he arrives and makes a total bollox of the job after charging you a fortune — do you blame the free ads paper for advertising him? They did not recommend him! As the old saying goes, paper never refused ink — especially where money is involved!

Well, that is slightly different from false advertising — that is the same as a young fit size 8 19 year old on the profile and you turn up to find a 50 year old size 20 opening the door — what do you do? — walk away! You don't agree to purchase her services!

A recruitment agency is not an advertising agency. Any reputable recruitment agency will interview and vet those who they "recommend" As you normally pay the agency and not the individual they are responsible for who they send to you. You don't pay E-I to see the ladies.

You use the word reputable, very wise, anything xtra-legal does not necessarily need to define this word.
After buying several clapped out lawnmowers and hired a number of cowboy builders from the free ads paper, said paper will go in the recycling unread.

And if you continously have to make long and ardous journeys (such as to D9,God bless you), in search of alluring 19 year olds but always find fat, female and fifty, then goodwill rapidly goes out the window.
Goodwill was an economic term, that reputable company could put a value on in their balance sheet.
Monopoly is also an economic term.

**casman** · 31-01-16, 10:19

Originally Posted by Beast

I liked lvt on the boards and what made her great was she wasn't false and she spoke her mind.

I agree,that's the reason she was so well liked and missed badly here,nothing on here now only a bunch of fake foneys.

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 10:20

Originally Posted by casman

I agree,that's the reason she was so well liked and missed badly here,nothing on here now only a bunch of fake foneys.

She was liked by some.

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 10:41

Originally Posted by Beast

I think you have a touch of ocd yourself, imo.

Only about you.

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 10:48

Originally Posted by Beast

I have to agree. From a business point of view we would all do the same thing and take the money.

E-I in fairness have the verified photos option and the opt out of reviews so that should be enough to put anyone off but its the people going to see these fake profiles that's the problem.

Now on the other hand if E-I had competition from another site then their focus may shift a little and try to keep the clients happy as well and look in to a realistic solution to all the fake profiles.

But for the moment its all about the revenue they can generate.

A sneering wanker, banker,
Beating his own drumm.
An Irish return, he doesn't hanker,
In jail now, what's to come?

**alcatel** · 31-01-16, 10:52

Originally Posted by Beast

I have that effect on people

Obvious animal magnetism.
Your avatar says it all.

**TonyStark** · 31-01-16, 13:20

Bit of topic this lol

My general, rule is opt out and unverified pictures or even one of the two I won't even bother reading any more of the profile.

Getting harder to trust the pics these days seeing I saw verified pictures once that had the watermark of the porn site they where taken from fs

Quite a lot of girls in Belfast are unverified or opt outs which makes it a pain trying to find someone to meet.

Thread: Unverified Photo, No reviews... do you risk it?

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

The Following User Says Thank You to casman For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to alcatel For This Useful Post:

Posting Permissions