Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: scammer stay clear of her!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lol brb View Post
    But if I go and meet an escort who has opted out of reviews and has verified photos, only to see she is a completely different person then what is the procedure?
    As the fake photo report clearly states: "REPORT FAKE PHOTOGRAPHS
    If you think the photos used above have been taken from another site or breach the non expicit terms of our site please fill out the following report. Please do not fill out this report if you have met xxxx and were not happy with the likeness."

    hello,

    please let me clarify,
    there are 3 possible scenarios here:

    1. For reporting "not the person in the pictures" of escorts that have opted out of the reviews system.
    Let just say escort A has got her pictures verified or not, opted out of reviews and you go to see her and there is a person Z working with this profile.
    If the escort allows the review, then you would need not to complete the booking and leave a review with "no service".
    If the escort does not allow the reviews, you can use this section but instead of link to the profiles or names, say "a blond escort in Dublin 1" is not who she says she is.
    This limits the abuse and prevents the bad mouthing of the advertisers, gives them the benefit of the doubt, without depriving you the option to use the warning section.
    If you flag this to our attention (via PM) we will investigate. Then we will expect you to provide the link to the profile (in private).
    We do not want to damage anyone's reputation without a proof.

    2. For reporting fake photos. There is a process for this and quite often many of these reports are invalid. You have to report it via the advert with a valid link so that a proper action can be taken. - This is for profiles which advertise with pictures that do not belong to the advertisers.
    We need a proof (link) and those will be investigated, when the report is approved the pictures will be taken down.

    3. You have met the advertiser and it is her but pictures have been enhanced.
    Here this sentence: "Please do not fill out this report if you have met xxxx and were not happy with the likeness" would make sense.
    If the photoshop has been applied and it is still the lady in the pictures please do not report those pictures as fake.
    Cause technically they are not stolen.

    I hope this helps.

  2. #22

    Default

    Very true.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyLu View Post
    hello,

    please let me clarify,
    there are 3 possible scenarios here:

    1. For reporting "not the person in the pictures" of escorts that have opted out of the reviews system.
    Let just say escort A has got her pictures verified or not, opted out of reviews and you go to see her and there is a person Z working with this profile.
    If the escort allows the review, then you would need not to complete the booking and leave a review with "no service".
    If the escort does not allow the reviews, you can use this section but instead of link to the profiles or names, say "a blond escort in Dublin 1" is not who she says she is.
    This limits the abuse and prevents the bad mouthing of the advertisers, gives them the benefit of the doubt, without depriving you the option to use the warning section.
    If you flag this to our attention (via PM) we will investigate. Then we will expect you to provide the link to the profile (in private).
    We do not want to damage anyone's reputation without a proof.

    2. For reporting fake photos. There is a process for this and quite often many of these reports are invalid. You have to report it via the advert with a valid link so that a proper action can be taken. - This is for profiles which advertise with pictures that do not belong to the advertisers.
    We need a proof (link) and those will be investigated, when the report is approved the pictures will be taken down.

    3. You have met the advertiser and it is her but pictures have been enhanced.
    Here this sentence: "Please do not fill out this report if you have met xxxx and were not happy with the likeness" would make sense.
    If the photoshop has been applied and it is still the lady in the pictures please do not report those pictures as fake.
    Cause technically they are not stolen.

    I hope this helps.
    It helps that I have no protection from fake profiles. as you clearly state I can be vague when talking about a fake profile which allows the fake to thrive on your site and also suggests that someone who is geniune but the vague clus makes it look like victims of scammers are talking about them. Bad for your advertisers and bad for their customers. ie to go by what I have been told of how to avoid scams and went strictly by that advice 3 quaters of Ladies would not be availabel in Belfast.

  4. #24

    Default

    Update this scammer is now very active in Armagh and Dungannon in the morning she could be in one area and hour later the other as this is posted the scammer is in Armagh. Save your money folks for a geniune lady.

  5. Default

    I've also been scammed in the past, not good felt awful, felt cheated, but in the end there was nothing I could do. Saying that if the lady does not allow reviews I do not book, I like to see plenty of feedback before I attend and even then I am very selective of who I see.

    One thing I must say is once you hand over the cash you are at the mercy of the escort.
    I've been lucky recently, that some of the ladies have not asked for the cash up-front..... normally because I am always interested in an hour or two, so I show them the cash in my wallet and they seem ok with it, then if I enjoy it I go for hour two, and they know I've got the money to pay, if I don't enjoy as much, I make excuses and pay and leave.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drbagehot View Post
    This is why many of us feel that the verified photos thing without allowing reviews is of no value. It's too easy to hack the system.
    Hack the system?
    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •