Man Jailed for threatening escort

[OutKast]

Thanks Sandy, I'm really not trying to blow anything out of proportion or be in any way hysterical. I'm just interested in the process that events would take.
Say two months after the law change a powerful individual or lobby objected to a group of girls working as escorts in a particular place. They applied pressure to the minister for justice, and they in turn told the guards to be seen to doing something. So the guards ask E-I for the ip addresses of the latest 50 reviewers, or top 50 or tom rambo What would happen?
It's unlikely, but could happen, be triggered by an expose or a trafficking case for example. I'm interested, not trying to stir up hysteria.

This website only knows only the ISP location we are using. E-I doesn't know where you live and only the ISP could know that information.

[lapd]

This website only knows only the ISP location we are using. E-I doesn't know where you live and only the ISP could know that information.

And that would only be given by ISP in rare cases, like the one we are talking about

[sashaeve]

Naming and shaming not the answer but court case it is the final one so it will serve as example for others Fuckers around thinking such attitude is ok with Escort

[Rachel Divine]

Yes, that's what I was wondering.
So if after the law change we met, I left a review and though we were both fine with what happened, the guards decided to investigate and prosecute me, then E-I would fully cooperate by giving ip address etc.
Would E-I being based in Spain or somewhere else complicate matters or does E-I have any other plans?

What Sandy said.
Also, if an escort doesn't make an official complain, nobody will investigate the matter.
Reviews without sexual explicit are okay, no offence would be committed by you. Time and companionship. x

[Rachel Divine]

Thanks Sandy, I'm really not trying to blow anything out of proportion or be in any way hysterical. I'm just interested in the process that events would take.
Say two months after the law change a powerful individual or lobby objected to a group of girls working as escorts in a particular place. They applied pressure to the minister for justice, and they in turn told the guards to be seen to doing something. So the guards ask E-I for the ip addresses of the latest 50 reviewers, or top 50 or tom rambo What would happen?
It's unlikely, but could happen, be triggered by an expose or a trafficking case for example. I'm interested, not trying to stir up hysteria.

I think it would be hassle free to just wait for punters outside the apartment.

[luvspunkin]

Absolutely delighted. Thanks for posting.

[MidlifeCrisis]

The response of the police was impressive. It is good that they put such effort into protecting an escort. I imagine some girls would have been uncertain whether contacting them might bring even more trouble.

[pleasurekerry]

if i knew who this f@kr was....!

[mr gear]

Why can't they name and shame him when when the papers seem to name and shame escorts much of the time?
In this case, they mention neither of them.
Surely threatening an escort is much worse than an escort trying to make a living? If they don't see this, then they are just scum.

They can't name him because if they did they would have to name the girl as well ...

[Curvaceous Kate]

They can't name him because if they did they would have to name the girl as well ...

Why would they have to name the victim? This isn't normal practice is it?