Men being taken advantage of...USED
Watching tv and all I see I see is ads for attractive girls that you can phone and chat to.
These calls cost 3.05 per minute...That is 183 euro per hour.......Just to chat to some anonymous, probably as ugly as hell woman.
I would rather pay that to an escort for....even....companionship...with a real person.
The tv ads will always be legal...............pity the poor lads who only have this service
Last edited by bollocks; 24-01-16 at 07:03.
lapd (24-01-16)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
TV ads will always be legal?
I wonder will the pending legislation affect non contact sexual services such as phone calls and Internet based video chat and so on
It's selling a sexual service.
bollocks (24-01-16)
The law in the North specifically did not apply to non contact sexual services after a number of questions and concerns were raised about that.Originally Posted by TonyB
I don’t know the reason, seems strange, given the beliefs of the religious zealots behind the law.
TonyB (24-01-16)
it is but its different to actually buying sex
I like a girl with a sense of humour.....The thread title made me chuckle....
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
So will massages be exempt?
Probably able to tax these services, so it's ok for half naked women on tv talking dirty to masturbating men via phone. Yet if I went to visit a girl and sat in one corner wanking while she sat in the other corner talking dirty would be a crime even though there is no contact. It's messed up.
Almost as messed up as guys ringing fully clothed daytime girls to masturbate to. Each to their own I guess.
Holding on to anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die
bollocks (24-01-16)
Are any of these ads by semi state concerns?
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
What do you guys think of this Ad??
" Thankful for those thankful for the things I did "
There is an old legal precedent that offering services is still prostitution, even if the girl is a scam and she has no intention of giving service. Service, under the same precedent, is masturbating her client, letting her client watch her masturbate etc. I would suspect that the new law would follow this precedent.
So, short answer is probably NO.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
