Minimum Ten Posts — Is It Good Or Bad?

[Petros]

When a newbie registers on E-I they need a minimum of 10 posts before they can avail of some of the features like joining groups and adding friends etc.

Judging by the number of newbies signing up and spamming threads purely to gain 10 posts I was wondering if this rule was actually helpful for the forum or not?

It is bad enough when they spam current threads but some seem to like resurrecting ancient threads for some reason.

Perhaps both a minimum post count along with a minimum number of days registered would be more constructive and cut down on the ?

[willie wacker]

When a newbie registers on E-I they need a minimum of 10 posts before they can avail of some of the features like joining groups and adding friends etc.

Judging by the number of newbies signing up and spamming threads purely to gain 10 posts I was wondering if this rule was actually helpful for the forum or not?

It is bad enough when they spam current threads but some seem to like resurrecting ancient threads for some reason.

Perhaps both a minimum post count along with a minimum number of days registered would be more constructive and cut down on the ?

And min 5 reviews as well to be included
To many can access too much and put nothing in

[Vitruvian]

And min 5 reviews as well to be included
To many can access too much and put nothing in

Why ????

Is a review a badge of honour.
A testimont to you're manlihood.

For some, less said, is much more.

[willie wacker]

Why ????

Is a review a badge of honour.
A testimont to you're manlihood.

For some, less said, is much more.

No it's not a testimont to your manhood or badge of honour.
IMHO I think it's testimont that your genuine.
Too many printers have access to reviews and its more than likely that what makes us choose which escort .
It's the reviews that sell this site.
Unless you are prepared to write reviews then you should not be able to see them.
It's only fair that you get out of it what you put in.

[Vitruvian]

No it's not a testimont to your manhood or badge of honour.
IMHO I think it's testimont that your genuine.
Too many printers have access to reviews and its more than likely that what makes us choose which escort .
It's the reviews that sell this site.
Unless you are prepared to write reviews then you should not be able to see them.
It's only fair that you get out of it what you put in.

Disagree, escorts sell this site, after all, they pay for it.
A review, is your opinion, this all

And don't give me this bull, you care about the next guy, really ?
I don't

It's me and her and what happens.

Between us !!!

[alcatel]

Disagree, escorts sell this site, after all, they pay for it.
A review, is your opinion, this all

And don't give me this bull, you care about the next guy, really ?
I don't

It's me and her and what happens.

Between us !!!

Reviews are why, from day 1,I have pretty much avoided going to people who want to tug you off and have you out the door in 10 minutes - even though you have agreed longer-or going to escorts who have virtually no English, or apartments where you hear many other voices in the living room etc etc etc
Apart from a few exceptions, most good escorts appreciate favourable reviews, they draw attention to them and their business.

[Cassandra]

No it's not a testimont to your manhood or badge of honour.
IMHO I think it's testimont that your genuine.
Too many printers have access to reviews and its more than likely that what makes us choose which escort .
It's the reviews that sell this site.
Unless you are prepared to write reviews then you should not be able to see them.
It's only fair that you get out of it what you put in.

Lols. Noone would bother doing that. Everyone uses this site.

[pete cavan]

this is my 10th post.

[Best Before]

And min 5 reviews as well to be included
To many can access too much and put nothing in

What's reviews got do with trolling!!

The current review system is broken and easily manipulated.

[MidlifeCrisis]

When a newbie registers on E-I they need a minimum of 10 posts before they can avail of some of the features like joining groups and adding friends etc.

Judging by the number of newbies signing up and spamming threads purely to gain 10 posts I was wondering if this rule was actually helpful for the forum or not?

It is bad enough when they spam current threads but some seem to like resurrecting ancient threads for some reason.

Perhaps both a minimum post count along with a minimum number of days registered would be more constructive and cut down on the ?

I would be in favour of a short period of time where new members can't post. This would discourage banned users from coming straight back as someone else, and would force newbies to educate themselves by doing some reading before they ask questions that have been asked and answered a hundred times. To be fair the spate of banned members re-registering to continue a feud has been effectively stopped by the night-time moderators. It was pretty ugly for a while.

I don't think you should stop them from PM'ing though. The whole point of the site is putting clients and escorts in touch, and for many people introducing themselves by PM is less intimidating than a phone call.