Minimum Ten Posts — Is It Good Or Bad?

[funlover12]

Good point but id say as Natalie said earlier the fact their are night time mods now should prevent future problems of that nature.

so youre saying the OP is rubbish and we should ignore the rambling? good, I do too.

[Naughtynatalie]

Again in agreement,sadly for a few weeks the cases were not few and far between,I accept you stated you are not here much at times and missed it,that's why I was explaining the difference which is clear and obvious.

Well you are resident poster after all so you wouldnt miss a thing
Has there been nastiness?
Petros poll & post never mentioned that, I thought by spammers & the content of his post he meant trolls that seem to wind some of you up when they dont fit in or agree with ye'!! My bad!

[Naughtynatalie]

so youre saying the OP is rubbish and we should ignore the rambling? good, I do too.

Haha that made me chuckle

[willie wacker]

When a newbie registers on E-I they need a minimum of 10 posts before they can avail of some of the features like joining groups and adding friends etc.

Judging by the number of newbies signing up and spamming threads purely to gain 10 posts I was wondering if this rule was actually helpful for the forum or not?

It is bad enough when they spam current threads but some seem to like resurrecting ancient threads for some reason.

Perhaps both a minimum post count along with a minimum number of days registered would be more constructive and cut down on the ?

And min 5 reviews as well to be included
To many can access too much and put nothing in

[Vitruvian]

And min 5 reviews as well to be included
To many can access too much and put nothing in

Why ????

Is a review a badge of honour.
A testimont to you're manlihood.

For some, less said, is much more.

[MidlifeCrisis]

When a newbie registers on E-I they need a minimum of 10 posts before they can avail of some of the features like joining groups and adding friends etc.

Judging by the number of newbies signing up and spamming threads purely to gain 10 posts I was wondering if this rule was actually helpful for the forum or not?

It is bad enough when they spam current threads but some seem to like resurrecting ancient threads for some reason.

Perhaps both a minimum post count along with a minimum number of days registered would be more constructive and cut down on the ?

I would be in favour of a short period of time where new members can't post. This would discourage banned users from coming straight back as someone else, and would force newbies to educate themselves by doing some reading before they ask questions that have been asked and answered a hundred times. To be fair the spate of banned members re-registering to continue a feud has been effectively stopped by the night-time moderators. It was pretty ugly for a while.

I don't think you should stop them from PM'ing though. The whole point of the site is putting clients and escorts in touch, and for many people introducing themselves by PM is less intimidating than a phone call.

[Petros]

so youre saying the OP is rubbish and we should ignore the rambling? good, I do too.

It is easy to ignore ramblings but for me it is annoying when I see a thread that I was involved with appear at the top of the "New Posts" but when I click on it I find some muppet resurrected it only to on it in order to boost his post count!

I would be in favour of a short period of time where new members can't post. This would discourage banned users from coming straight back as someone else, and would force newbies to educate themselves by doing some reading before they ask questions that have been asked and answered a hundred times. To be fair the spate of banned members re-registering to continue a feud has been effectively stopped by the night-time moderators. It was pretty ugly for a while.

I don't think you should stop them from PM'ing though. The whole point of the site is putting clients and escorts in touch, and for many people introducing themselves by PM is less intimidating than a phone call.

Good points Midlife

[willie wacker]

Why ????

Is a review a badge of honour.
A testimont to you're manlihood.

For some, less said, is much more.

No it's not a testimont to your manhood or badge of honour.
IMHO I think it's testimont that your genuine.
Too many printers have access to reviews and its more than likely that what makes us choose which escort .
It's the reviews that sell this site.
Unless you are prepared to write reviews then you should not be able to see them.
It's only fair that you get out of it what you put in.

[Naughtynatalie]

It is easy to ignore ramblings but for me it is annoying when I see a thread that I was involved with appear at the top of the "New Posts" but when I click on it I find some muppet resurrected it only to on it in order to boost his post count!

Good points Midlife

See that doesnt bother me, I just move on. What I find annoying is when half decent threads are completely hijacked with repetitive shite. We all go off topic at times but its painful to read a lot on here of late. It's why I hardly bother with this forum anymore.


I voted accordingly

[Vitruvian]

No it's not a testimont to your manhood or badge of honour.
IMHO I think it's testimont that your genuine.
Too many printers have access to reviews and its more than likely that what makes us choose which escort .
It's the reviews that sell this site.
Unless you are prepared to write reviews then you should not be able to see them.
It's only fair that you get out of it what you put in.

Disagree, escorts sell this site, after all, they pay for it.
A review, is your opinion, this all

And don't give me this bull, you care about the next guy, really ?
I don't

It's me and her and what happens.

Between us !!!