Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: New EOTM Rules — Are they fair, are they good?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    7,241
    Reviews
    27

    Exclamation New EOTM Rules — Are they fair, are they good?

    There was a thread posted earlier today by a moderator announcing a change in rules for the Escort of the Month Competition. In this post an escort was named as the winner of the competition for October.

    The main changes to the rules was the calculation of points based on the number of green stars received during the month and the dropping of the rule where reviews will only count when a) the reviewer has held a message boards account for six months and b) their reviews will only be counted from their tenth review.

    It now appears that anyone can register on EI and leave a positive review for an escort. They no longer are required to be registered for 6 months and their first review counts towards an escort winning the coveted title.

    However:

    If you go to the General Chat forum and look at Sticky: Escort of the Month: Hall of Fame and Competition Rules

    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...petition-Rules

    you will see that the rules are listed as follows:

    As with all competitions, there are rules to ensure that everything is fair:

    For each review submitted, a star ratings given for each area of the review will have a points value. The higher the outcome for each area selected, the more points that review will be worth. The escort with the highest points value by the end of the month will be declared the winner.
    The month that the escort is announced the winner will be the winner based on the points totalled from the previous month; i.e. 'Miss September' is calculated from the reviews submitted in August, and so on.
    Reviews will only count when a) the reviewer has held a message boards account for six months and b) their reviews will only be counted from their tenth review.
    If a client resubmits a review for an escort that they have already visited, only their first review will have a points value. In any event, the new review will always replace the old review.
    If we believe that a review is fake, we may disqualify an escort from the competition for the month. If there are more serious cases of cheating, we may disqualify escorts from all future competitions.
    Escorts cannot win the competition two consecutive months. In the event of an escort receiving the highest points a second month in a row, the person in second place will take the winning spot.
    Reviews that are submitted from a masked (proxified) or non-Irish/non-Northern Irish IP address will be deleted.
    Once the winner has been announced for a particular month, any review points that are received for that month thereafter will not be counted or carried over into the next month.

    You will notice it begins with “there are rules to ensure that everything is fair”

    It also includes the rule “Reviews will only count when a) the reviewer has held a message boards account for six months and b) their reviews will only be counted from their tenth review.”

    These were the rules of the competition for a long time and are sill in the sticky on the forum for everyone to see.

    So by all normal reason and in all fairness any review submitted last month should have to comply with these rules surely? After all, the rules are there to ensure fairness in the completion.

    But In the post the Moderator posted earlier the reviews of the winner announced do not comply with the above rules, those in the sticky.

    Under the rules which were posted today — 2 days after the close of the completion for Miss October, a different escort has won the competition to that of who should have won under the rules that we all knew about and were posted on the forum for everyone to see, both escorts and clients alike.

    How can a competition operate fairly when the rules are changed after the competition closes?

    This is totally unfair to the escort who has met the requirements of the existing rules but is now told “sorry - because we changed the rules someone else has won the title". It is especially unfair as the Official rules are still in place.
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Petros For This Useful Post:

    Larissa Laurentis (02-10-15), Escort Advertiserpatty (02-10-15), Rachel Divine (02-10-15), robbie9 (02-10-15), zoozoozoo (02-10-15)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,287
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    I think a work count on each review should count

    And every time boobies are mentioned
    Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,127
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Ye lot really get into this don't ye

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to annabel taylor For This Useful Post:

    Flappy (02-10-15), greenie (02-10-15)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,009
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annabel taylor View Post
    Ye lot really get into this don't ye
    Tis a well known FACT, that all EOTM have an open pm policy and will meet sad desperate delusional men for drinks

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dick For This Useful Post:

    SmallHorn (02-10-15), The dirt bird (02-10-15)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,127
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick View Post
    Tis a well known FACT, that all EOTM have an open pm policy and will meet sad desperate delusional men for drinks
    You forgot blames there childhood for been a cunt

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to annabel taylor For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,667
    Reviews
    64

    Default

    All too political for the likes of me.

    Send nudes

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to SmallHorn For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,009
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annabel taylor View Post
    You forgot blames there childhood for been a cunt
    true but I also forgot the chip on the shoulder for being the funny unsexy one

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,327

    Default

    If the rules were changed during September and announced properly, I would have said okay, but to pull this rules up in order to give another escort the title, is totally unfair.

    The sticky is there with the ''old'' rules, therefore those should have been applied.

    Now they made up different ones, those should apply for the next eotm.

    By every review counts as a point opens the competition to a huge abuse.

    Also, Sam didn't accept reviews from hidden ip, fair enough but not to accept reviews from a foreign ip is ridiculous.

    Let's see. I meet a French guy tonight, he flies back to France tomorrow and decides to review me. Wouldn't that be legit?

    It seems not from the new management.

    I still wonder why they are screwing Larissa over. Maybe because she is not Irish ( sorry for playing the nationality card here).. Not fair, she worked it hard, she is nice and popular on here.

    I'm really confused..
    Naughty videos on EF.

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Rachel Divine For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (02-10-15), Dick (02-10-15), jakelanders (02-10-15), Larissa Laurentis (02-10-15), mymann (03-10-15), Petros (02-10-15), SophieX (02-10-15), zoozoozoo (02-10-15)

  15. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,805
    Reviews
    25

    Default

    who gives a shit

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,202
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post
    If the rules were changed during September and announced properly, I would have said okay, but to pull this rules up in order to give another escort the title, is totally unfair.

    The sticky is there with the ''old'' rules, therefore those should have been applied.

    Now they made up different ones, those should apply for the next eotm.

    By every review counts as a point opens the competition to a huge abuse.

    Also, Sam didn't accept reviews from hidden ip, fair enough but not to accept reviews from a foreign ip is ridiculous.

    Let's see. I meet a French guy tonight, he flies back to France tomorrow and decides to review me. Wouldn't that be legit?

    It seems not from the new management.

    I still wonder why they are screwing Larissa over. Maybe because she is not Irish ( sorry for playing the nationality card here).. Not fair, she worked it hard, she is nice and popular on here.

    I'm really confused..
    In fairness it doesn't take much to confuse you Hun

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •