Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: The 'TORL' Lies Regarding The Movement Of Escorts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    15,941

    Default The 'TORL' Lies Regarding The Movement Of Escorts

    Here at Escort-Ireland, we try not to jump head-first into the debate over the law changes in regards to the purchasing of sex, for reasons that those in the escort world will be well aware of.

    But for some reason, when TORL claim that supply for services had reduced due to a “85% increase in online prostitution in Dundalk.
    We wonder where thy get their figures from, as when we looked, that number doesn't seem to add up.

    Read our article to know more:
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/blog/...nt-of-escorts/
    Last edited by Floki; 21-07-15 at 13:39.

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Floki For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (21-07-15), Dutch1968 (21-07-15), joggon (21-07-15), libra (22-07-15), Melindablondey (21-07-15), nibb (21-07-15), Sexy Sandy 69 (21-07-15)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,453
    Reviews
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Floki View Post
    Here at Escort-Ireland, we try not to jump head-first into the debate over the law changes in regards to the purchasing of sex, for reasons that those in the escort world will be well aware of.

    But for some reason, when TORL claim that supply for services had reduced due to a “85% increase in online prostitution in Dundalk.
    We wonder where thy get their figures from, as when we looked, that number doesn't seem to add up.

    Read our article to know more:
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/blog/...nt-of-escorts/
    Will they jump up and down about the 16 trafficked agricultural workers discovered in Armagh yesterday. No I don't think so And yet the will come with an 85% figure for Dundalk. The mind boggles
    .

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nibb For This Useful Post:

    Floki (21-07-15), joggon (21-07-15), Petros (22-07-15), Wolverine (21-07-15)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Another indication maybe the number of reviews Floki.

    June 2014 there were 29 reviews submitted. June 2015 there were 29 reviews submitted... Doh!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:


  7. #4

    Default

    It is sensationally way off stuff . You got to stand by all the stuff you say. Long term, there won't be a mainstream audience for them that would trust them. They drive the discussion around escorting to the extremes. There has got to be some nuance going forward, but its not coming from their side

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Another indication maybe the number of reviews Floki.

    June 2014 there were 29 reviews submitted. June 2015 there were 29 reviews submitted... Doh!
    Don't you just love consistency? This time of year is notoriously quiet for Belfast due to the marches and holidays etc, so consequently numbers go down. Of course that also leaves numbers open for manipulation unless you use the facts from previous years as well, which they won't do.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    Davidontour (22-07-15), Ladyvonteese (21-07-15)

  10. #6

    Default

    Cant see how they would have the numbers for last year or any other - they seem to be making them up anyway

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    755
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    These organisations never let facts or honesty get in the way of a good headline .
    And media organisations don't appear to have journalists who care to check these statements and give any counter argument .

    It's all about funding. And we all know low the charity scene works here . Top earners will lie through their smiles to mentain their positions and expenses

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Playitsam For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (22-07-15), Davidontour (22-07-15), liffey (22-07-15)

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    272

    Default

    Maybe they picked figures from a different advertising site that may have seen such an increase.

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eirefella View Post
    Maybe they picked figures from a different advertising site that may have seen such an increase.
    Which one are you thinking of? I use most of the ones that Independent Escorts can use and I've not seen any increase like this at all. I've just checked AW and there is nothing. Vivastreet has one male advertising and nothing on backpage for Dundalk. Nothing on the site that can not be mentioned either.
    Last edited by CurvaceousKate; 21-07-15 at 17:20.

  15. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eirefella View Post
    Maybe they picked figures from a different advertising site that may have seen such an increase.
    Did you mean "cherry picked" there?
    Thanks,
    Gary - Manager

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •