Child abuser has sentence halved as judges rule six-year-old victim 'was gay'
Two Argentine judges are under fire after cutting the sentence of a paedophile in half on the grounds that his six-year-old victim was gay.
Describing the now 11-year-old as having a “homosexual orientation”, appeal court judges Horacio Piombo and Benjamín Sal Llargués decided to cut the prison sentence for Mario Tolosa from six years to three, as they felt his victim was “accustomed to sexual behaviour” following years of abuse by his father.
“It cannot be considered abuse when a boy is used to being abused in his home and is accustomed to sexual behaviour and has a homosexual orientation,” they said in their ruling.
Calls to impeachment the judges have spread across the country after the verdict came to light last week.
Justice Piombo defended the decision on Monday, saying that before Mr Tolosa molested the boy, the child had already suffered “the initiation by his father into the worst of worlds, leading him to depravation.”
The judge said that as a result of that experience, the boy had showed “signs of a transvestite conduct, of conduct we had to take into account.”
Adding that Mr Tolosa’s actions could not be considered “gravely outrageous” in legal terms because his victim was already “making a precocious choice” about his sexuality.
The ruling dates from last year but become public last week as prosecutors at Buenos Aires’ Supreme Court decided to appeal the verdict.
The Argentine Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Trans have demanded the judges be removed from the bench, saying the ruling placed the victim "in the position of a suspect".
Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo said the ruling was "an embarrassment".
"It's repugnant to say that the presumed sexual orientation of an abused six-year-old boy is a reason to reduce the sentence of the abuser," he added.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to irishdeltaforce For This Useful Post:
Rachel Divine (23-05-15), slavetoyou (23-05-15)
Sexuality is a very peculiar thing, and I guess you could have a 100 judges, who if they were to give judgement, would all give different sentences.
It would depend very much on the judges own view of whats right or wrong, or how right or how wrong something might be
Also one would ot be aware of the sexual activities etc of a judge. or a clergyman or anyone else.
You can be sure some visit prostitutes. and would inflict severe penalties on others who visited prostitutes.
Thats what you call double standards.
One has to feel sympathy for all people in the world who are sexually and physically abused,,and now,,,,all those who disapear, and have no story to tell...The world is becoming more horrible
Originally Posted by irishdeltaforce
It is like saying a lady for choosing to work as an escort can not report a rape due the nature of her job.
Surely the boy did not choose to be abused by his father in the first place nor by others.
The Following User Says Thank You to Rachel Divine For This Useful Post:
but is it not the same here, pedos get far less then they should because they are being looked after by they fellow scum who set the sentence didn't a priest get off with a years suspended sentence for years of abuse because he was old and they said he wouldn't live to see the end of a normal sentence, in most cases the law favours the scum , in this country more so then others