Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Creative Writer Rachel Moran On TV 3's Ireland AM

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    2,400
    Reviews
    3

    Default Creative Writer Rachel Moran On TV 3's Ireland AM

    Yes, the Creative writer appeared with Jill Meagher's husband to support the 'We Don't Buy it' campaign aimed at marginalizing male punters in anticipation of the upcoming change in the law!
    Rachel got the easiest ride of her life (at least. she now has had at least one ride! ) from an ill informed Sinead Glesson and Mark Cagney who swallowed her spew more avidly than any hungry nympho swallowing cum!
    Sad to see that Jill Meagher's husband who obviously went through such pain on the murder of his wife by a psychotic with a history of attacks on sex workers, doesn't realize the common sense that this insane law can only increase such attacks!
    Rachel, who by the way is getting noticeably fatter (grant money?), pointed out that she dislikes the term 'sex worker' preferring instead a term thought to her by a NY lawyer -'prostituted women' as prostitution is the only crime that blames the victims! - How insane is that, it's TORLER NUTTERS who are criminalizing sex work further and doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of sex workers, indeed the exact opposite! Oddly enough the creative writer doesn't realize that men and transgender people can also be sex workers!
    The 'interview' was around 8.20 this morning, sorry I cannot get a direct link!
    Ride them on the beaches!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to The Libertarian For This Useful Post:

    Sexy Sandy 69 (24-04-15)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,360

    Default

    "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" - Henry David Thoreau.

  4. Default

    Yeah, she looks and acts like a stupid Reformed Bitch??

  5. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Libertarian View Post
    Yes, the Creative writer appeared with Jill Meagher's husband to support the 'We Don't Buy it' campaign aimed at marginalizing male punters in anticipation of the upcoming change in the law!
    Rachel got the easiest ride of her life (at least. she now has had at least one ride! ) from an ill informed Sinead Glesson and Mark Cagney who swallowed her spew more avidly than any hungry nympho swallowing cum!
    Sad to see that Jill Meagher's husband who obviously went through such pain on the murder of his wife by a psychotic with a history of attacks on sex workers, doesn't realize the common sense that this insane law can only increase such attacks!
    Rachel, who by the way is getting noticeably fatter (grant money?), pointed out that she dislikes the term 'sex worker' preferring instead a term thought to her by a NY lawyer -'prostituted women' as prostitution is the only crime that blames the victims! - How insane is that, it's TORLER NUTTERS who are criminalizing sex work further and doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of sex workers, indeed the exact opposite! Oddly enough the creative writer doesn't realize that men and transgender people can also be sex workers!
    The 'interview' was around 8.20 this morning, sorry I cannot get a direct link!
    A very scary lady. She describes herself as a 14 year old drug addicted 'Knacker', failed by her family, social services and friends, who willingly sells the use of her vagina for money and then decides that it is all the customers fault. Of course, she is partly right. Any man who abuses any woman or has sex with underage prostitutes should be punished even if the girl is willing. Paying for something wrong does not make it right. By the same token, paying for something right should not make it wrong.

    The most infuriating thing about this woman is that she should dare compare herself to the hundreds of amazing escorts that I have met or that the low-lifes which is all that she could attract in any way represent the vast majority of men who visit escorts. How many abused, under-aged, drug addicted 'knackers' have any of you guys met?? She represents only the lowest and vilest of this business which we would all like to see done away with.

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mexicanpete For This Useful Post:

    Brunette Tess (25-04-15), Cassandra (25-04-15), Irish Leigha (24-04-15), Sexy Sandy 69 (24-04-15), Vitruvian (24-04-15)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    2,400
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mexicanpete View Post
    A very scary lady. She describes herself as a 14 year old drug addicted 'Knacker', failed by her family, social services and friends, who willingly sells the use of her vagina for money and then decides that it is all the customers fault. Of course, she is partly right. Any man who abuses any woman or has sex with underage prostitutes should be punished even if the girl is willing. Paying for something wrong does not make it right. By the same token, paying for something right should not make it wrong.

    The most infuriating thing about this woman is that she should dare compare herself to the hundreds of amazing escorts that I have met or that the low-lifes which is all that she could attract in any way represent the vast majority of men who visit escorts. How many abused, under-aged, drug addicted 'knackers' have any of you guys met?? She represents only the lowest and vilest of this business which we would all like to see done away with.
    Well if she started sex work at 14 years old, at that stage, she would only ever encounter scum of the earth paedos as clients and they were committing what was and is quite correctly deemed a serious criminal act by abusing her!
    Also, curiously enough, street sex workers in Dublin would have known each other very well, yet absolutely none from that era, seem to remember her working as a sex worker at all!
    Is anybody seriously telling me that no street worker then or now would not have assisted a 14 year old child let alone not remember one!
    Ride them on the beaches!

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,673
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    She probably blames the drug dealers too?
    Last edited by warmcome; 25-04-15 at 12:07.

  9. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warmcome View Post
    She probably blames the drug dealers too?
    I have not read the book but it would appear that the only people to blame for her situation were the clients that she offered herself to.

  10. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Libertarian View Post
    Well if she started sex work at 14 years old, at that stage, she would only ever encounter scum of the earth paedos as clients and they were committing what was and is quite correctly deemed a serious criminal act by abusing her!
    Also, curiously enough, street sex workers in Dublin would have known each other very well, yet absolutely none from that era, seem to remember her working as a sex worker at all!
    Is anybody seriously telling me that no street worker then or now would not have assisted a 14 year old child let alone not remember one!
    This is a 'bandwagon' book. She is simply cashing in on the current hysteria. 'It took me ten years to write it' roughly translates as 'I have just thought of how I could rip off my former clients even more by writing exaggerated stories about them'.

    I wonder how much of her story is actually true and how much is 'creative' writing. Investigating her story would be a good project for a journalist if any real journalists existed. Unfortunately, what passes for journalists these days are all writing fashion pieces about 'the emperor's clothes'.

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,046
    Blog Entries
    40

    Default

    She had a bad time. She was isolated then come Nun torch a lit showing her the way.
    You'd almost think she takes it personally that her expirience wasn't that of every sex worker
    Were she to face the truth would mean she'd have to elavate herself from Career-Victimn into a Woman with a modicon of self-responsibility.
    What if "It's Raining Men" and 'Let the bodies hit the floor' are both about the same event but from different perspectives 🤔

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •