It's not "sex work"

[Empirical]

The New Statesman, which you might expect to have a more adult attitude, has a post today by Sarah Ditum who doesn't want "prostitution" rebranded as "sex work":

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics...ution-sex-work

She references "Rachel Moran" as a survivor; yet this Rachel is widely felt to be not quite which she represents herself.

It's a major problem discovering what the facts are about sex work; I don't doubt that some people have been damaged, or that some have been trafficked, yet this seems to be a minority.

I worked for a state organisation; I was bullied and threatened by the management, and bullied and threatened by my seniors. Am I a survivor of "work"?