Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 910111213 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 130

Thread: Worst news ever

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,127
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoesphHenry View Post
    Yeah, 'meh' with a certain demographic. And law doesn't affect most voters. Fine Gael demographic is centre-right, traditional family values: so, for Fine Gael this law fits snugly. It can be spun and twisted to show what a good job they're doing. Parties legislate for their voter base - the conservative gents will sip their wine relieved that the country is doing its bit for the poor-and-downtrodden 'victims' whilst secretly eying up the latest girls on EI. And the tea cups of the 'Dear Ladies' will cease to rattle in their saucers.

    Perfect post, anyone in opposition of this can simply be labelled pimp or pervert and supports raping of girls
    Its a moral issues, and nice one to play some political games with bit of distraction, get the feminist catholic vote, coz sure those nice folk at fine geal help the poor things out

    Plus Fitzgerald wants something big to promote how she going to get tough on crime,

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,153
    Reviews
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinR View Post
    GREAT
    Ihavent went to meet an escourt yet (dying to because sex with the same girl is getting ...)
    i always hold back on meeting my first escourt because im a bit nervous and nervous of where the location would be....some risky neighborhood or town etc. .....and now THIS!? ..............starting to wonder about the whole fantasy now...
    Forget the theory-go for the practical!

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoesphHenry View Post
    Yeah, 'meh' with a certain demographic. And law doesn't affect most voters. Fine Gael demographic is centre-right, traditional family values: so, for Fine Gael this law fits snugly. It can be spun and twisted to show what a good job they're doing. Parties legislate for their voter base - the conservative gents will sip their wine relieved that the country is doing its bit for the poor-and-downtrodden 'victims' whilst secretly eying up the latest girls on EI. And the tea cups of the 'Dear Ladies' will cease to rattle in their saucers.
    Seeing that it's Frances Fitzgerald introducing the law and she's Labour - I think it's more to save their behinds as they've royally fucked up politically in this government, especially in party promises as they were the ones suppose to prevent some of the harsher Fine Gael policies. Alan Shatter was against this law and Fitzgerald has reversed some of the decisions he was suppose to introduce such as lowering the age of consent. When we met with Fitzgerald, she asked one of our companions as a feminist how can she support the buying of sex, as Sweden introduced the law on Gender Equality reasons.
    Give me a call 083 455 2811 or PM to book in advance
    Smithfield 5th - 11th February
    Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/CuteCatriona

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,127
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catriona View Post
    Seeing that it's Frances Fitzgerald introducing the law and she's Labour - I think it's more to save their behinds as they've royally fucked up politically in this government, especially in party promises as they were the ones suppose to prevent some of the harsher Fine Gael policies. Alan Shatter was against this law and Fitzgerald has reversed some of the decisions he was suppose to introduce such as lowering the age of consent. When we met with Fitzgerald, she asked one of our companions as a feminist how can she support the buying of sex, as Sweden introduced the law on Gender Equality reasons.

    Labour and fine geal are one now a days

    They do not care what you or I have to say, there pushing this for the press release

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,360

    Default

    today they signalled the intention to build council houses........ and while i applaud that, again the timing is done close to election to gain votes.....they have to systematically plan their attacks
    "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" - Henry David Thoreau.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,682
    Reviews
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catriona View Post
    Seeing that it's Frances Fitzgerald introducing the law and she's Labour - I think it's more to save their behinds as they've royally fucked up politically in this government, especially in party promises as they were the ones suppose to prevent some of the harsher Fine Gael policies. Alan Shatter was against this law and Fitzgerald has reversed some of the decisions he was suppose to introduce such as lowering the age of consent. When we met with Fitzgerald, she asked one of our companions as a feminist how can she support the buying of sex, as Sweden introduced the law on Gender Equality reasons.

    Frances Fitzgerald is Fine Gael. As for the age of consent, I even heard David Quinn argue that it should be lowered to 16.
    Shatter seemed have a more open opinion on this issue and kicked it down the road a few times, but it is very clear that Fitzgerald only sees it one way. Given the whip system and the support for TORL from FF SF and several independents, I could see only 4 or 5 TDs voting against this model.
    Public opinion hasn't been tested on this issue and to be honest I don't think it is an issue that those not involved particularly care about.

    What can be done?
    For one the public don't like to be lied to, point out the lies of TORL.
    Focus on the consenting adults argument.
    Focus on the deployment of Garda resources towards policing this, away from serious crime.
    Focus on the issues of privacy and threats to civil liberty
    Focus on the fact that current laws exist to punish all of the abuses in the sex industry
    And focus on the fact that this law is based on nothing other than ideology.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dob For This Useful Post:

    JMastodon (27-11-14), JoesphHenry (26-11-14), liffey (26-11-14)

  8. Default

    Guys you really need to calm those nerves and and don't be too concerned about this these boys in Leinster house don't do anything quickly and they may not be around in the next six months

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dob View Post
    Frances Fitzgerald is Fine Gael. As for the age of consent, I even heard David Quinn argue that it should be lowered to 16.
    Shatter seemed have a more open opinion on this issue and kicked it down the road a few times, but it is very clear that Fitzgerald only sees it one way. Given the whip system and the support for TORL from FF SF and several independents, I could see only 4 or 5 TDs voting against this model.
    Public opinion hasn't been tested on this issue and to be honest I don't think it is an issue that those not involved particularly care about.

    What can be done?
    For one the public don't like to be lied to, point out the lies of TORL.
    Focus on the consenting adults argument.
    Focus on the deployment of Garda resources towards policing this, away from serious crime.
    Focus on the issues of privacy and threats to civil liberty
    Focus on the fact that current laws exist to punish all of the abuses in the sex industry
    And focus on the fact that this law is based on nothing other than ideology.
    What I should have added earlier is the importance of the bun-baking-fundraising Ladies (Kinder-Küche-Kirche). You can see it in both sides of Irish religions. On the outside, it looks like the men rule-the-roost, but look closely and the men are always watching over their shoulders as to whether their wives approve - they have to sleep in the same bed Those same men are in the Dail. And most of the women TDs have the same socio-economic-religious background - Fitzgerald is a good example. There are exceptions, unfortunately few.
    However, that centre-middle element is a tough nut to crack.

    Can't resist in saying - in the light of moral and belief involvement, to the exclusion of almost everything else - the road to hell is paved with good deeds.

    The whole feminist argument is obfuscation - a form of control over fellow women. You can't eat feminism, you can't drink it, it doesn't pay the water bill

    There is a lot of hypocrisy and lying.

    You highlighted some excellent points:
    For one the public don't like to be lied to, point out the lies of TORL.
    Focus on the consenting adults argument.
    Focus on the deployment of Garda resources towards policing this, away from serious crime.
    Focus on the issues of privacy and threats to civil liberty
    Focus on the fact that current laws exist to punish all of the abuses in the sex industry
    And focus on the fact that this law is based on nothing other than ideology.

  10. #109
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,909
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Here are some reasons:

    • When something is illegal, it creates a lucrative black market for criminals
    • It promotes the stigma that sex workers are the dregs of society and reinforces hate crime towards them
    • It will be more difficult for sex workers to 'vet' their clients do clients constantly changing their details and phone numbers to avoid getting caught
    • Known sex work locations will be constantly monitored by police who will be hounding their [escort's] clients, which in turn, will have an adverse impact on their livelihood
    Very good points samlad.

    By Samlad
    Comment

    When something is illegal, it creates a lucrative black market for criminals
    We need look no further than illegal drugs and excise-free cigarettes for proof of this (and these are only two such lucrative markets for criminals)

    It promotes the stigma that sex workers are the dregs of society and reinforces hate crime towards them
    To be honest, I have often thought that this is an "intended" consequence of Swedish-style Legislation. When one considers how relatively light a client could be penalized (a fine and a caution [initially ])versus the numerous indirect (and indeed very severe) negative implications for Independent Sex Workers

    It will be more difficult for sex workers to 'vet' their clients do clients constantly changing their details and phone numbers to avoid getting caught
    As a result, Independent Sex Workers may find themselves losing respectable Clients who may stop (due to ramifiactions of
    Swedish-style Legislation if caught by Police), and will unfortunately end up accepting bookings from potentially dangerous (possibly criminal element) Clients who may subject them to abuse. As with the above point, I think this is an "intended" consequence.

    Known sex work locations will be constantly monitored by police who will be hounding their [escort's] clients, which in turn, will have an adverse impact on their livelihood
    As above, I believe that this is another "intended" consequence. It is most likely the intention in this instance to ensure an Escorts business suffers to the point that they cannot afford to operate from a premises (maybe even become homeless) and then forced into the "safety" of Ruhama and TORL.
    Odds against you?

    PM The Equalizer

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Equalizer For This Useful Post:

    JMastodon (27-11-14), samlad (27-11-14)

  12. Default

    It will definitely affect the business big time...
    -A lot of punters will not take the chance
    -The power of the escort will in fact increase. Eg threat of blackmail. But for most it will be less business and more hassle.
    -Some other business's will gain. Eg sugardaddy.
    -Many established escorts will move to other territories like germany spain
    -Increase in sex tourism
    -Perhaps some innovation eg "massage or genteman's clubs"
    With some ploy like you go for a massage, the lady starts to give you a blow-job and you can be fairly sure its not a cop...
    However still risk of blackmail etc so big deterrent for punters.
    -Cops will go after punters as high profile and also easy low risk work compared to chasing bank robbers, terrorists etc who carry real guns!*
    -Also the media will love it so lot of backhanders to cos to get juicy stories.
    Overall the policy will have desired affect...less escorting and less punting plain and simple.
    Most punters and escorts will simply move on to other hobbies abd jobs.

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 910111213 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •