Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Hyperbole reviews and 'Fresh Meat'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default Hyperbole reviews and 'Fresh Meat'

    Just seen Kendra's thread 'Fresh Meat' in the General Chat section. I was discussing something similar to this, this morning with one of the Ad Staff members. We receive about 80 reviews a day, and from reading through them, clients seem to be visiting a lot of the younger, new, less experienced escorts. It seems that clients are very eager to point out every flaw in their service, and I suppose, yes, fair enough on one side, but then, well, what do you expect? on the other side. I am also very conscious that there are clients that visit escorts out of habit rather than seeing escorts for something to look forward to, which ironically, we could bat the cliché back at them, that they are just "going through the motions" and "everything is mechanical", expecting a lot from fresh-faced escort with not many notches under her belt.

    This poses the question, who is to blame for a bad appointment really? In some cases, yes, of course there are escorts that mess clients around, want them in and out of the door as quickly as possible and have no time for idle chit-chat, double book, etc. but there are also clients looking for the cheapest rates with the broadest spectrum of services available, and want to stay afterwards for a cup of tea and a slice of cake. Could it be, like social media, that people don't want to make time for each other generally? Is the gloom of a potential piece of legislation condemning the payment of sexual services putting a looming black cloud over everyone? Do experienced clients expect too much from escorts these days?

    When I process reviews, I am always a firm believer that clients that have had a good experience have had the best time ever, and they tick the top outcomes for everything. When a client has had a bad experience, it was the WORST appointment EVER and all negative outcomes are checked, adding, "AVOID AVOID AVOID" to reinforce their point. I call these 'hyperbole reviews' (a deliberate exaggeration of the truth used to create a dramatic effect). The ones I regard as most likely and plausible are the ones when clients have a very balanced overview of the booking, so for example, the ones when the client enjoyed himself without the whole, "she is an angel with the powers of Aphrodite, I would marry her, the BEST ESCORT EVER!!! LOL" etc, or the ones when clients have a bad experience without the whole, "AVOID AVOID AVOID, WORST ESCORT EVER!", blah-di-blah.

    There is a lot of criticism of the reviews system, and not without good reason, I will admit that, but generally, the public are really responsible for the content that is written and need to do this within the review guidelines.

    What are your thoughts? In your own experiences (as everyone's experiences will differ!), are clients expecting too much these days or does the fault lie in the escorts and the service they provide? Please do not single any escorts out.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    ana massage (01-10-14)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Daon Phoblacht Chorcaí
    Posts
    1,291
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    oh christ
    "Courtesy costs nothing, yet buys things that are priceless." - Respect for all Escorts at all times!...

    Captain Jack Sparrow - I make water wet

    Thank you Ladies for the good times x..

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to jacksparrow2010 For This Useful Post:

    Alex.xx (02-10-14)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,739
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Just seen Kendra's thread 'Fresh Meat' in the General Chat section. I was discussing something similar to this, this morning with one of the Ad Staff members. We receive about 80 reviews a day, and from reading through them, clients seem to be visiting a lot of the younger, new, less experienced escorts. It seems that clients are very eager to point out every flaw in their service, and I suppose, yes, fair enough on one side, but then, well, what do you expect? on the other side. I am also very conscious that there are clients that visit escorts out of habit rather than seeing escorts for something to look forward to, which ironically, we could bat the cliché back at them, that they are just "going through the motions" and "everything is mechanical", expecting a lot from fresh-faced escort with not many notches under her belt.

    This poses the question, who is to blame for a bad appointment really? In some cases, yes, of course there are escorts that mess clients around, want them in and out of the door as quickly as possible and have no time for idle chit-chat, double book, etc. but there are also clients looking for the cheapest rates with the broadest spectrum of services available, and want to stay afterwards for a cup of tea and a slice of cake. Could it be, like social media, that people don't want to make time for each other generally? Is the gloom of a potential piece of legislation condemning the payment of sexual services putting a looming black cloud over everyone? Do experienced clients expect too much from escorts these days?

    When I process reviews, I am always a firm believer that clients that have had a good experience have had the best time ever, and they tick the top outcomes for everything. When a client has had a bad experience, it was the WORST appointment EVER and all negative outcomes are checked, adding, "AVOID AVOID AVOID" to reinforce their point. I call these 'hyperbole reviews' (a deliberate exaggeration of the truth used to create a dramatic effect). The ones I regard as most likely and plausible are the ones when clients have a very balanced overview of the booking, so for example, the ones when the client enjoyed himself without the whole, "she is an angel with the powers of Aphrodite, I would marry her, the BEST ESCORT EVER!!! LOL" etc, or the ones when clients have a bad experience without the whole, "AVOID AVOID AVOID, WORST ESCORT EVER!", blah-di-blah.

    There is a lot of criticism of the reviews system, and not without good reason, I will admit that, but generally, the public are really responsible for the content that is written and need to do this within the review guidelines.

    What are your thoughts? In your own experiences (as everyone's experiences will differ!), are clients expecting too much these days or does the fault lie in the escorts and the service they provide? Please do not single any escorts out.
    I think some punters want to get a grip.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to irishdeltaforce For This Useful Post:

    Alex.xx (02-10-14)

  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksparrow2010 View Post
    oh christ
    No, I'm only human

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Daon Phoblacht Chorcaí
    Posts
    1,291
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    No, I'm only human
    Sam your full of it.

    I notice you still didnt post a review?
    Last edited by jacksparrow2010; 01-10-14 at 13:20.
    "Courtesy costs nothing, yet buys things that are priceless." - Respect for all Escorts at all times!...

    Captain Jack Sparrow - I make water wet

    Thank you Ladies for the good times x..

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksparrow2010 View Post
    Sam your full of it.

    I notice you still didnt post a review?
    It would be wrong for me to post a review for a freebie, bud.

  10. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Daon Phoblacht Chorcaí
    Posts
    1,291
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    It would be wrong for me to post a review for a freebie, bud.
    oh so as a manager you would see a ladie for a freebie??? really?? very professional!
    well i very much doubt the ladie went as low as a freebie.. meeting you is low enough!
    "Courtesy costs nothing, yet buys things that are priceless." - Respect for all Escorts at all times!...

    Captain Jack Sparrow - I make water wet

    Thank you Ladies for the good times x..

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to jacksparrow2010 For This Useful Post:

    samlad (01-10-14)

  12. #8

    Default

    AAA+++ebayer, er, sorry, Moderator!!! Would use again!!! +++


  13. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Parked outside in that private ambulance
    Posts
    1,163
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Just seen Kendra's thread 'Fresh Meat' in the General Chat section. I was discussing something similar to this, this morning with one of the Ad Staff members. We receive about 80 reviews a day, and from reading through them, clients seem to be visiting a lot of the younger, new, less experienced escorts. It seems that clients are very eager to point out every flaw in their service, ...

    That's a good shpiel Sam. There are ladies who are more proactive than others, and more proactive means they have experience and confidence. They know how to play, or they can act well. We love them. There's nothing more boring than a lady who will just lie back and think of (whatever) and let you do whatever.

    Reviewing a passive lady is a real challenge. You know she needs good reviews, she means no harm, and everyone has to start somewhere. But you paid your money, spent time getting there, took your time with her, but couldn't recommend her to your best friend - which is what reviews are all about.

    I agree about hyperbole, good or bad - maybe a 24-hour cooling off period between the visit and posting the review would help?
    Mmmm-hmm




  14. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    leopardstown
    Posts
    57
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    I recently had a perfectly good review deleted. It wasn't a negative review, it showed as a neutral. No hyperbole or emotive or insulting language or comments - just factual summary and acknowledging that as it was a cheap punt that it wasn't bad value.

    If this type of review is not acceptable then frankly the review system isn't worth having or even looking at - I see dozens of the polemic reviews either by guys who fall in love with every girl or those who obviously turn up late or drunk and then extract revenge by posting a damming review. The more balanced reviews are the ones worth reading

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •