Just seen Kendra's thread 'Fresh Meat' in the General Chat section. I was discussing something similar to this, this morning with one of the Ad Staff members. We receive about 80 reviews a day, and from reading through them, clients seem to be visiting a lot of the younger, new, less experienced escorts. It seems that clients are very eager to point out every flaw in their service, and I suppose, yes, fair enough on one side, but then, well, what do you expect? on the other side. I am also very conscious that there are clients that visit escorts out of habit rather than seeing escorts for something to look forward to, which ironically, we could bat the cliché back at them, that they are just "going through the motions" and "everything is mechanical", expecting a lot from fresh-faced escort with not many notches under her belt.
This poses the question, who is to blame for a bad appointment really? In some cases, yes, of course there are escorts that mess clients around, want them in and out of the door as quickly as possible and have no time for idle chit-chat, double book, etc. but there are also clients looking for the cheapest rates with the broadest spectrum of services available, and want to stay afterwards for a cup of tea and a slice of cake. Could it be, like social media, that people don't want to make time for each other generally? Is the gloom of a potential piece of legislation condemning the payment of sexual services putting a looming black cloud over everyone? Do experienced clients expect too much from escorts these days?
When I process reviews, I am always a firm believer that clients that have had a good experience have had the best time ever, and they tick the top outcomes for everything. When a client has had a bad experience, it was the WORST appointment EVER and all negative outcomes are checked, adding, "AVOID AVOID AVOID" to reinforce their point. I call these 'hyperbole reviews' (a deliberate exaggeration of the truth used to create a dramatic effect). The ones I regard as most likely and plausible are the ones when clients have a very balanced overview of the booking, so for example, the ones when the client enjoyed himself without the whole, "she is an angel with the powers of Aphrodite, I would marry her, the BEST ESCORT EVER!!! LOL" etc, or the ones when clients have a bad experience without the whole, "AVOID AVOID AVOID, WORST ESCORT EVER!", blah-di-blah.
There is a lot of criticism of the reviews system, and not without good reason, I will admit that, but generally, the public are really responsible for the content that is written and need to do this within the review guidelines.
What are your thoughts? In your own experiences (as everyone's experiences will differ!), are clients expecting too much these days or does the fault lie in the escorts and the service they provide? Please do not single any escorts out.