Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Issues of privacy, respect and consent.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    264

    Default Issues of privacy, respect and consent.

    Seriously lads (and girls) people here as, elsewhere, need to give some thought and consideration to the concepts of privacy, respect and consent and what is or is not acceptable.

    If one takes nude or personal photos of oneself and posts or publishes them on this site or indeed on the internet generally and / or allow or permit them to be posted or published, that is a personal choice for them. The subject consents to it. Even then one is still entitled to be treated with respect and not be subjected to bullying and cruel comments.

    People on here, men and women, with consent and agreement, take and post photos and that is fine.

    But take Jennifer Laurence, for example. Her representatives now advise that those photos were private and personal and were hacked and stolen. In those circumstances, they ought not to have been posted in my humble opinion.

    Just think about this for a minute. What would happen if a client filmed or recorded a girl or a meeting secretly and posted it? Either or both would be gravely wrong and show serious lack of respect and breach of trust and privacy. And similarly what if girls here secretly recorded meetings (and posted them on the comedy channel obviously!), that too would be equally worrying.

    So everyone, have a thought and a care.......
    Last edited by willieh; 01-09-14 at 10:11.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to willieh For This Useful Post:

    dob (01-09-14), sixfourblond (01-09-14)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Where I do agree with you I think as in this case where you have a celebrity and it's already out there and highlighted by the media it is a slightly different situation. Someone was out to gain money from exposing this celebrity, which is where 'respect' goes out the window. It's not quite the same as another person 'spreading the news' kind of thing and in this case she is an adult and has a certain amount of control.

    In contrast for someone to take film/pictures without the other persons knowledge and put them on the internet is a complete invasion of privacy. It is the element of deception that makes it worse, as they (the victim) are not taking a measured risk, but being abused from the start.
    Last edited by CurvaceousKate; 04-09-14 at 04:36.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,547
    Reviews
    56

    Default

    Any pic or film clip used without the owners consent is wrong! But in this technology filled world we live in they should know better than to leave pics etc on phones and devices which can be hacked They obviously took them for someone to look at? But unfortunately not quite the few million that have.someone else taking and making these pics etc without permission should be tracked down and prosecuted. If you take these pics of yourselves remember once out there always out there and could come back to bite you in the bum

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    12,216
    Reviews
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willieh View Post

    But take Jennifer Laurence, for example.
    Yes please,in several positions.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bettercallsaul For This Useful Post:

    Cornelia (04-09-14), willieh (04-09-14)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CurvaceousKate View Post
    Where I do agree with you I think as in this case where you have a celebrity and it's already out there and highlighted by the media it is a slightly different situation. Someone was out to gain money from exposing this celebrity, which is where 'respect' goes out the window. It's not quite the same as another person 'spreading the news' kind of thing and in this case she is an adult and has a certain amount of control.

    In contrast for someone to take film/pictures without the other persons knowledge and put them on the internet is a complete invasion of privacy. It is the element of deception that makes it worse, as they (the victim) are not taking a measured risk, but being abused from the start.
    I strongly disagree with you Kate on the latter point that you make. Whether one is a celebrity or not, whether one takes nude pictures or video for one's own use or not, where one does not release that to public view or where one does not share that with anyone else, one is absolutely entitled to one's privacy.

    If one takes such recordings or pictures and shares them with another person or allows another to take them, then obviously one is taking a very serious risk in the first place. Even then one is entitled to have one's privacy and limits respected.

    Seriously, what public interest or good is there in seeing pictures of another person in the nude? If a politician takes an anti drug stance and votes against decriminalisation, there may be a valid reason to show him or her taking drugs. I suppose if a politician votes for or advocates criminalising escort services such we have available here, then perhaps there may (just may!) be some rationale to publicising activities that are contrary to those statements. But even then I do not believe that the public interest or good would, could or should allow film of that person having sex with an escort!!!!

    But the above are just my own personal views!

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bettercallsaul View Post
    Yes please,in several positions.
    Trust you ..... say hello to Claudia23 for me!

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,466
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willieh View Post
    Seriously lads (and girls) people here as, elsewhere, need to give some thought and consideration to the concepts of privacy, respect and consent and what is or is not acceptable.

    If one takes nude or personal photos of oneself and posts or publishes them on this site or indeed on the internet generally and / or allow or permit them to be posted or published, that is a personal choice for them. The subject consents to it. Even then one is still entitled to be treated with respect and not be subjected to bullying and cruel comments.

    People on here, men and women, with consent and agreement, take and post photos and that is fine.

    But take Jennifer Laurence, for example. Her representatives now advise that those photos were private and personal and were hacked and stolen. In those circumstances, they ought not to have been posted in my humble opinion.

    Just think about this for a minute. What would happen if a client filmed or recorded a girl or a meeting secretly and posted it? Either or both would be gravely wrong and show serious lack of respect and breach of trust and privacy. And similarly what if girls here secretly recorded meetings (and posted them on the comedy channel obviously!), that too would be equally worrying.

    So everyone, have a thought and a care.......
    A true independent indie would never do that .We only want to earn our living on the honest way as possible.

    In the other had a con escort would, who is look to blackmail the guy or take some money from it, cases and cases,I've heard similar situations...Another reason to choose wise who you see.
    Retired for good all together.
    Thank you all the gentlemen I met, who I'll have sweet memories of it.
    Kids, don't do anything that I wouldn't after I'm gone( the good part?) not much left Loll





  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Sexy Fernanda For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserCindy Forever (04-09-14)

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sexy Fernanda View Post
    A true independent indie would never do that .We only want to earn our living on the honest way as possible.

    In the other had a con escort would, who is look to blackmail the guy or take some money from it, cases and cases,I've heard similar situations...Another reason to choose wise who you see.

    Hi Fer!!!!!! Good to hear from you!!! Yes the girls I see would never do that. But there have been cases of people who move girls around and who have numerous apartments having secretly, without the knowledge or consent or either the girl or the client, filmed the 'action' as it were!!!!!! Now that was lousy!!!!!!!!!

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sexy Fernanda View Post
    A true independent indie would never do that .
    Bullshit. They mightn record something but some indeps cant keep their mouths shut. Thats a character trait and nothing to do with true indept or not.

    Westside.

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,466
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willieh View Post
    Hi Fer!!!!!! Good to hear from you!!! Yes the girls I see would never do that. But there have been cases of people who move girls around and who have numerous apartments having secretly, without the knowledge or consent or either the girl or the client, filmed the 'action' as it were!!!!!! Now that was lousy!!!!!!!!!
    Another reason to choose well from who the escort rent the accommodation from. In Dub I've my own place and when I went to somebody else apartment in D18, I knew I could trust the girl also. On the country I rather use hotel to work from as I don't like the idea of being in a n apartment where every week there are two different girls .

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    Bullshit. They mightn record something but some indeps cant keep their mouths shut. Thats a character trait and nothing to do with true indept or not.

    Westside.
    I am vouching for small group of girls I know of: Cindy, Patty,Larissa and Renatha,only. I can't say anything about the rest ,coz I never met then,to which will leave something up to another 500 escorts.

    You are totally entitled to say such thing but DO NOT include myself and the names I mention on the same equation,we don't need to con clients with bul*hit stories to take money from then.Blackmail and go on. We rather work hard to have an income,we are escorts and not some kind of organised group who uses the escort business to make a living more than meet the date's ,gives then a lovely time and that's it.

    That's what I mean by independent indies, any ladies that reads this descriptions and see themselves on it ,will understand what I mean and any guy who also has met this lady will also understand what I mean.It's not easy to get it,when you only participates on the internet forum. The escort scene on the real world is a little different from the boards.You can picture or believe in all the stories you hear till you are there for real, you will see the difference and get it is not bull*hit.

    Ps. Someone who does such thing, I would never call her a professional escort,coz that's not what you are in the business for. I would call a con artist who uses the business as toll to perform her act,so please don't put these two different type of people in the same group ,coz we are not.

    Have a lovely afternoon.
    Last edited by Sexy Fernanda; 04-09-14 at 14:39.
    Retired for good all together.
    Thank you all the gentlemen I met, who I'll have sweet memories of it.
    Kids, don't do anything that I wouldn't after I'm gone( the good part?) not much left Loll





  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sexy Fernanda For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserCindy Forever (04-09-14), Escort Advertiserpatty (09-09-14), willieh (04-09-14)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •