The real Deal

[bluefan1]

Believe me, in this case its true.

She is a good friend of Hunny Bunny (Vanessa). Started off this game a few years ago. Naïve, not quite knowing all the GFE and service bit... got a few disappointed customers and a few dodgy reviews. Not surprisingly business suffered, so we opt out. Biz picked up again and we thought.... Hey, reviews are not the be all and end all.... She is now a very good escort but has to bear the cross of those bad reviews.... I haven't availed of her services, but know those that have. I believe she offers a very good service, looks exactly as per pics and is a lasher too...

While I'm all in favour of escorts being helped in this demanding industry and I think James' motives are good in this instance, I'm not sure this is fair to other escorts who have been forced to opt out too - for whatever reasons. And James, hearsay - or being 'Hunny Bunny's' flatmate - is not grounds enough for a valid opinion. I've been slated before for saying this but if you haven't visited an escort, then touting is just plain silly. For the record I have visited with Monica and was unable to leave a review.

James makes an interesting point about historical reviews. Is there a period of time after which an escort can have her reviews removed? I know most of Rachel's have recently been removed (to my certain knowledge they were all excellent) and I wonder could an escort who had a few early mishaps have those early reviews deleted? Maybe earn a reprieve after a specified length of time?

It's an interesting issue in a wider societal context too because an early legal misdemeanour can remain on a person's record. I know of some who've struggled many years later to qualify for travel Visas because of a minor teenage infraction.

[sixfourblond]

While I'm all in favour of escorts being helped in this demanding industry and I think James' motives are good in this instance, I'm not sure this is fair to other escorts who have been forced to opt out too - for whatever reasons. And James, hearsay - or being 'Hunny Bunny's' flatmate - is not grounds enough for a valid opinion. I've been slated before for saying this but if you haven't visited an escort, then touting is just plain silly. For the record I have visited with Monica and was unable to leave a review.

James makes an interesting point about historical reviews. Is there a period of time after which an escort can have her reviews removed? I know most of Rachel's have recently been removed (to my certain knowledge they were all excellent) and I wonder could an escort who had a few early mishaps have those early reviews deleted? Maybe earn a reprieve after a specified length of time?

It's an interesting issue in a wider societal context too because an early legal misdemeanour can remain on a person's record. I know of some who've struggled many years later to qualify for travel Visas because of a minor teenage infraction.

Good point. I really enjoy so many great comments here but don't think it's fair that some girls have promoters here...it's like pimping...while I am on the subject looks like agencies are back big time

[JAMESCORK]

While I'm all in favour of escorts being helped in this demanding industry and I think James' motives are good in this instance, I'm not sure this is fair to other escorts who have been forced to opt out too - for whatever reasons. And James, hearsay - or being 'Hunny Bunny's' flatmate - is not grounds enough for a valid opinion. I've been slated before for saying this but if you haven't visited an escort, then touting is just plain silly. For the record I have visited with Monica and was unable to leave a review.

James makes an interesting point about historical reviews. Is there a period of time after which an escort can have her reviews removed? I know most of Rachel's have recently been removed (to my certain knowledge they were all excellent) and I wonder could an escort who had a few early mishaps have those early reviews deleted? Maybe earn a reprieve after a specified length of time?

It's an interesting issue in a wider societal context too because an early legal misdemeanour can remain on a person's record. I know of some who've struggled many years later to qualify for travel Visas because of a minor teenage infraction.

Good point. I really enjoy so many great comments here but don't think it's fair that some girls have promoters here...it's like pimping...while I am on the subject looks like agencies are back big time

I'm not pimping her per se... I'm just pointing out that a good girl may not be a bad escort because of the perception we have of "opt out" profiles, she was just unlucky with a bad start.

Its a good point you make tho Blue, should girls be given a second chance and start with a clean slate?

[Versace Targeryan]

Admin: obsolete picture removed


That's Monica and she is the real deal. Why she opts out is her own business but she is lovely, funny and sexy....

Believe me, in this case its true.

She is a good friend of Hunny Bunny (Vanessa). Started off this game a few years ago. Naïve, not quite knowing all the GFE and service bit... got a few disappointed customers and a few dodgy reviews. Not surprisingly business suffered, so we opt out. Biz picked up again and we thought.... Hey, reviews are not the be all and end all.... She is now a very good escort but has to bear the cross of those bad reviews.... I haven't availed of her services, but know those that have. I believe she offers a very good service, looks exactly as per pics and is a lasher too...

I'm not pimping her per se...

it is pimping. its a +ve review 4 a lady u never met as a client and who doesnt allow reveiws. Bluefan met her as a client and cudnt give her a good reveiw. second chances happen all the time. ladys set up a new profile no one blinks. she cud do that.

[John1234ABCD]

While I'm all in favour of escorts being helped in this demanding industry and I think James' motives are good in this instance, I'm not sure this is fair to other escorts who have been forced to opt out too - for whatever reasons. And James, hearsay - or being 'Hunny Bunny's' flatmate - is not grounds enough for a valid opinion. I've been slated before for saying this but if you haven't visited an escort, then touting is just plain silly. For the record I have visited with Monica and was unable to leave a review.

James makes an interesting point about historical reviews. Is there a period of time after which an escort can have her reviews removed? I know most of Rachel's have recently been removed (to my certain knowledge they were all excellent) and I wonder could an escort who had a few early mishaps have those early reviews deleted? Maybe earn a reprieve after a specified length of time?

It's an interesting issue in a wider societal context too because an early legal misdemeanour can remain on a person's record. I know of some who've struggled many years later to qualify for travel Visas because of a minor teenage infraction.

How discreet....

[bluefan1]

How discreet....

Shit.....Guilty as charged....is there a way of editing that out?

[John1234ABCD]

Shit.....Guilty as charged....is there a way of editing that out?

Its too late to edit. PM a mod, or PM a few and when theyre online they will edit it. Ask them to edit my quote too

[Versace Targeryan]

just delete the thraed all together. its only gossip and speculation anyway

[richieboy]

it is pimping. its a +ve review 4 a lady u never met as a client and who doesnt allow reveiws. Bluefan met her as a client and cudnt give her a good reveiw. second chances happen all the time. ladys set up a new profile no one blinks. she cud do that.

Look like jamescork has a soft spot for the ladys don't know if I would call it pimping but everyone have their own opinion .

[JAMESCORK]

it is pimping. its a +ve review 4 a lady u never met as a client and who doesnt allow reveiws. Bluefan met her as a client and cudnt give her a good reveiw. second chances happen all the time. ladys set up a new profile no one blinks. she cud do that.

So it is or it isnt, who cares?..... Whats your point exactly...