what is the point

[ninebythree]

pat,

step back on this planet for five mins and listen to me,

in cork at the moment there is 48 escorts ,only 19 of them have verified photos or accept reviews.
Is it so difficult that an escort who advertises for the first time send u a pic with an escort ireland sign in front of her.

No ,tell the truth u dont give a fuck once u get the bobs.


nbt

[sharpe223]

hey man your so right
we just gotta make the most of it when u get one u like fuck her hard give her one she,ll rememeber it,s the only way

[Patricia]

in cork at the moment there is 48 escorts ,only 19 of them have verified photos or accept reviews.
Is it so difficult that an escort who advertises for the first time send u a pic with an escort ireland sign in front of her.

I agree with you, but I can't change the fact that many escorts in Ireland are not interested in getting their pics verified. Maybe they can't be bothered to go through the verification process, or maybe their photos are fake (because they don't want to use real ones or can't be arsed to get real ones) and so they can't get them verified? Whatever their reasons, this is the situation we face. I have two choices, we can either let escorts advertise without verified pics or turn them away when they don't have verified pics. Personally, I think the more choice the better for clients, even if that means unverified photo ladies advertised. I also think you can't force ladies to use verified pics, they will only do that when they want to. Further, I think - REALLY - it is clients who can change this situation more than anyone else. If ladies using unverified photos get no bookings, they soon realise something is wrong and call us... We then advise them that they need to get their pics verified in order to be busy. This is how things change. Over half the ladies with verified pics on our site today started out with unverified pics, but learnt from client reactions to them that they needed to get their pics verified in order to be successful. I think client power is really the way forward here.

[chatman]

in reply, if there getting no buisness because of unverified pics they will just use someone elses pics ,kristina/katrina etc etc so what is the point,if they cant use verified pics why not put them in a seperate listing so when a punter logs in he has a choice of which site to visit,all phones now have cameras so why if an escort is advertising in cork this week is she not asked to send a picture of herself in cork to e.i manager, and if she moves to dublin next week to do the same this is the only way we can be sure of pics been real and if there phone hasent got a camera well tell them to get one its not as though they cant afford a new one

[nedrix]

good idea, but would it work

[chatman]

of course it would work,the mobile pic would go to e.i of the escort on condition that its for verifaction only and not to be printed unless the escort gives permission this is because some escorts dont want there faces seen, the picture can then be verified against pics sent in by escort to e.i that they want put on site, afterall escorts are sending in pics to e.i so why cant they send in on a monthly basis mobile pics of themselves and if they refuse to do this put them on a unverified site so when i click on to e.i i can go to which site i want [ verified or unverified site or both ] the pics would have to be full lenght so e.i can see that stats are close to being factual as well,also if i visit an escort and i send in a review saying its not the girl in pics on site e. i could ring escort and state that unless a mobile pics of her in area she says she is in isnt received within 12 hours her pics would be moved to unverified site, this would also stop people sending in false reviews saying its not the girl in pics when it is , this new site structure would bring more punters as people are leaving or not joining as they feel they cant trust verifacation process

[bigpaws]

of course it would work,the mobile pic would go to e.i of the escort on condition that its for verifaction only and not to be printed unless the escort gives permission this is because some escorts dont want there faces seen, the picture can then be verified against pics sent in by escort to e.i that they want put on site, afterall escorts are sending in pics to e.i so why cant they send in on a monthly basis mobile pics of themselves and if they refuse to do this put them on a unverified site so when i click on to e.i i can go to which site i want [ verified or unverified site or both ] the pics would have to be full lenght so e.i can see that stats are close to being factual as well,also if i visit an escort and i send in a review saying its not the girl in pics on site e. i could ring escort and state that unless a mobile pics of her in area she says she is in isnt received within 12 hours her pics would be moved to unverified site, this would also stop people sending in false reviews saying its not the girl in pics when it is , this new site structure would bring more punters as people are leaving or not joining as they feel they cant trust verifacation process

This is an idea which could actually work and work well ................ maybe Patricia could look at this as viable option???

Paws

[chatman]

thank you for your reply, now has anyone else out there got any other ideas of making this site 100 percent accurate for us the punters and escorts so that when we click on an escort we know what we are getting is what it says on the tin, lets get rid of the fakes and have a possitive site

[carlos marvado]

of course it would work,the mobile pic would go to e.i of the escort on condition that its for verifaction only and not to be printed unless the escort gives permission this is because some escorts dont want there faces seen, the picture can then be verified against pics sent in by escort to e.i that they want put on site, afterall escorts are sending in pics to e.i so why cant they send in on a monthly basis mobile pics of themselves and if they refuse to do this put them on a unverified site so when i click on to e.i i can go to which site i want [ verified or unverified site or both ] the pics would have to be full lenght so e.i can see that stats are close to being factual as well,also if i visit an escort and i send in a review saying its not the girl in pics on site e. i could ring escort and state that unless a mobile pics of her in area she says she is in isnt received within 12 hours her pics would be moved to unverified site, this would also stop people sending in false reviews saying its not the girl in pics when it is , this new site structure would bring more punters as people are leaving or not joining as they feel they cant trust verifacation process

It is already possible for an escort to send a picture of herself for verification purposes to E-I by email with the proviso, that it will not be used in the advert. I suspect that this has been done on an ad-hoc basis only where there was a question concerning the veracity of an escort's pictures. I don't know what resources would be required to make this a standard feature of photo verification. Perhaps Patricia would like to comment on this.

[chatman]

we all see reviews where punters say it is the girl in pics but that the pics are probally a few years old and that the escort has put on a few pounds since so the only way i can see working is that the escort must send in a full lenght picture of her if she is in cork standing by a landmark shop in that area, a moving vidoe of herself walking around cork today cant be used next year as e.i manger can ring escort today and say show yourself now at this landmark