Reviews 18046 and 18047

[MrFussy]

These just highlight that the girl in photos is not the actual girl, does not appear that he even visited as one is for Limerick and one for Dublin, at the same time, is this not more apt in Warning section rather than reviews?

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 018047 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 018046 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

[dom]

These just highlight that the girl in photos is not the actual girl, does not appear that he even visited as one is for Limerick and one for Dublin, at the same time, is this not more apt in Warning section rather than reviews?

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 018047 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 018046 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

yet MORE VERIFIED false pictures.

its not that difficult to sort this!

dom

[carlos marvado]

Quite right, he can't have been in two places at the same time, so all he's doing is reporting fake pictures rather than posting two actual reviews. Obviously it is his mistake, as he has used the review process to do this, but my view is that they should be deleted out of the review section and transfered to the Warning section if possible.

[MrFussy]

Quite right, he can't have been in two places at the same time, so all he's doing is reporting fake pictures rather than posting two actual reviews. Obviously it is his mistake, as he has used the review process to do this, but my view is that they should be deleted out of the review section and transfered to the Warning section if possible.

I agree, I've PM'd Sarah as regards this, if we all did this we'd have 100+ reviews in no time.

[MrFussy]

i dont mean to cause offence or anything but if the pics are fake surely this is a good thing to let everyone else know they are fake.

nbt said in an eariler thread that you dont have to see an escort to wright a review on your experiances booking, etc. like that guy that waited 3 min then left but still he was allowed to write a review

My point and reason for posting this was to highlight what forum to use to warn about fakes. I reckon it should be done via the Warning section and not the Review process. I myself have walked away when meeting a girl who does not look like photos but I have gone to the trouble of at least visiting them and posting the review choosing the option of visiting girl but no service. This poster appears not to have visited as the reviews are for 2 different locations at the same time. Just my opinion

[carlos marvado]

i dont mean to cause offence or anything but if the pics are fake surely this is a good thing to let everyone else know they are fake.

nbt said in an eariler thread that you dont have to see an escort to wright a review on your experiances booking, etc. like that guy that waited 3 min then left but still he was allowed to write a review

,

Making a booking, confirming it, turning up and then not being able to contact the escort is a valid reason for submitting a review. i.e. made a booking, but did not receive the service. In the case of the two reviews being discussed here, it very much looks as if no appointments were ever made and the sole purpose of the reviews is to warn about fake pictures. This is not one of the options for submitting a review, but is covered within the Warning Forum (or evening pming) so that E-I Ad Staff and prospective clients can be made aware of this.