Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: Eotm

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    330

    Default Eotm

    i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
    Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
    Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
    Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

    maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    7,241
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by easygo View Post
    i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
    Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
    Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
    Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

    maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm
    Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

    The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!
    Last edited by Petros; 04-03-16 at 20:10.
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Petros For This Useful Post:

    casman (04-03-16)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,041
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petros View Post
    Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

    The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!
    That seems to knock out escorts who don't allow reviews.

    my fav does not currently advertise.

    unfare?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    7,241
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bollocks View Post
    That seems to knock out escorts who don't allow reviews.
    It is the escorts own choice whether they allow reviews or not - if they don't want to participate in the review system of which EOTM is part of then that is their choice!
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Petros For This Useful Post:

    bollocks (05-03-16)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petros View Post
    Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

    The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!
    repeat review hardly applies in this case as new ladies .
    maybe rule is that review is counted as date submitted and not date lady was visited .if that is case surely it is then open to abuse .

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    7,241
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by easygo View Post
    repeat review hardly applies in this case as new ladies .
    maybe rule is that review is counted as date submitted and not date lady was visited .if that is case surely it is then open to abuse .
    As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

    It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petros View Post
    As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

    It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.
    am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
    if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
    ps i am open to be corrected .

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petros View Post
    As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

    It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.
    I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by easygo View Post
    am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
    if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
    ps i am open to be corrected .
    The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

    The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
    The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so therefore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
    Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.
    Last edited by JAMESCORK; 05-03-16 at 12:04.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    willie wacker (05-03-16)

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,108
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.



    The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

    The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
    The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so theretofore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
    Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.
    Yep your 100% correct
    I don,t think they are going to make the same mistake twice


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willie wacker View Post
    Yep your 100% correct
    I don,t think they are going to make the same mistake twice
    The new system does get complicated when two girls have the same number of qualifying reviews. It moves into the calculation of star rating first, and then into "would recommend" and "would see again" next.

    Older method was a tad easier...

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •