new review idea

[whiteknight111]

There was some discussion in this thread
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...r-reviews.html
about this for some reason 4 different mods attacked the idea
in a series of elqoquent attacks? Are they also against El gordos blog and the escort of month competeion
which also use numbers?

THE IDEA
Use maths to create an automatic escort reliabity score for each escorts and tables to display it,

1:each review is fed into equation which assigns it a relaibity score
based on each reviews varibles e.g. no of reviews of reviewer, satstisfaction ratings etc etc etc.
2:These scores are summed for all reviews of the escort
3:This total reliabity score is displayed on the escorts page next to number of reviews.
4:Somewhere in the review section of website the following two lists are created
Active Escorts by number of reviews (already exists currently top 30 including inactive escorts)
Active Escorts by total reliabity score

for example I don't want to name names but there are currently two escorts on site each with 8 reviews
One girl 5 of reviews are first time and two are second time all postive , one negative from a guy with 10 reviews.
The other girl has also 8 postive review two of them trusted reviews between all 8 of her reviewers they have nearly 100 reviews between them. If we fed these numbers into the system girl no 2 would have a far better total reliabity score on her page and her postion in table would be far higher than girl one.

WHY DO IT?
The design of the equation would not be hard theres only a few input variables
and the software to create these scores and tables does not seem like a hard thing to do
By weighting the input variables it should be possible to make life much harder for fake reviewers
Such a set of tables and scores would really highlight the geniune escorts and really show up the fake/crap ones.
Many punters don't have time to check everything out I would imagine to check all reviews and such
so it would save a lot of time.
The tables and scores would be a aid to picking an escort.
To defeat system fake reviewers would have have to work very hard and the more reviews they write the more mistakes they make and more reviews of girls they are in compotetion with they would have to write
Such a system would not give much weight to reviewers with only a few reviews thus making the point
of writing fake reviews pointless.
End result more business to good girls less business to bad girls
more happy punters more unhappy hustlers.

Now all we need is equation and a bit of elbow grease?

[Quarterpoundher]

I don't know why there is a tendency here to say a mod is "attacking" something when they just express an opinion or view within the rules of conduct. Maybe its the mindset of the person using that term or similar words or maybe its just that the tone of how something is said is lost with the written word but I am getting tired of being painted in that light when all I am doing is expressing my opinion in a calm and considered way.

[Noah]

If Patricia wants to pay for me to personally verify the ladies i am prepared to to do that and offer my feed back to the punters here, i know i will have to have sex multiple times daily but i am willing to endure for the sake of a quality review system.

what do you think Patricia?

[Patricia]

I am not opposed to giving an idea like this a try if enough people want to and a good equation can be devised.

[whiteknight111]

TRRS = total review relibity score(-20 to +20)
NR = number of reviews
PIRRS = postive indivdual review reliabilty score(1 to 20)
NIRRS = negative indivdual review reliabilty score(1 to 20)

TR = Trusted reviewer (3 points)
NRR = Number of reviwers by reviewer (7 points)
1-2 = zero
3-10 = 1
10-15 = 2
15-20 = 3
20-25 = 4
25-30 =5
30-35 = 6
35> = 7
SR = Satsifaction rating ( 10 points)
negative
very dissatisified = 10
dissatsfied = 5
grey = 1
n/a = 2
postive
satisfied = 5
very sat = 10

equation
*IRRS = (3 + 7 + 10)
PIRRS = (TR + NRR + SR)
NIRRS = (TR + NRR + SR)
TRRS = ((SUM(PIRRS)- SUM(NIRRS))/NR)


So you add up your PIRRS and all your NIRRS subtract them from each other and then divide by NR
Ratted reviews have to be discounted as you cannot say did the escort/agancecy leave them
or did a mentalist. Grey reviews and n/a are weighted as slighty NIRRS.

Some examples (I assumed that all reviews gave very satsfied to save time)

kellycurvebaby(10)
(15 + 10 + 20 + 16 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10+11) 122/10 = 12
Kelly Curvybabe, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

anya(8)
Anya, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
(20 + 11 + 15 + 12 + 13 + 11 + 11 + 11) /8 = 104/8 =13

feernado(7)
(50-2)/6 = 48/6 = 8
Fernanda, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

caty(4)
(25 -10)/4 =15/4 = 4
Cathy, Offaly Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

Isabella(2)
(0-12-7)/2 = -19/2 = -10
Isabela, Laois Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

Escorts can be listed by TRRS or NR or (TRRS*NR)
may take some tweaking of variables or perhaps a better way.

[Quarterpoundher]

One problem I see is with the points awarded or deducted based on what option the reviewer chooses. We all see reviews that are saying she is the best thing since sliced bread and then goes and picks the very dissatisfied option for service, This error on the part of the reviewer and that it is such a common event means that it will seriously subvert the outcome of the points awarded/deducted to any Escort where this happens.

If an automated system existed right now to tot up the points based on this equation then it would not have the human factor of someone reading what is said in the review and seeing a contradictory choice of options, it would in most cases be an incorrect negative option being picked by reviewer that leads to a point deduction for an Escort who had a positive in tone review so although a good idea it has an inbuilt serious snag right from the start that is caused by human error in the options chosen by which the system would faithfully but incorrectly tally the points.

Unless someone wants to add up all the points manually and read all the reviews to spot when an incorrect option was picked then this won't work as it has the seeds of its own downfall included, namely human error. There would be many cases of Escorts being given - or + points until the day that no reviewer ever makes a mistake either unintentionally or otherwise.

[nicegirlsarenice]

TRRS = total review relibity score(-20 to +20)
NR = number of reviews
PIRRS = postive indivdual review reliabilty score(1 to 20)
NIRRS = negative indivdual review reliabilty score(1 to 20)

TR = Trusted reviewer (3 points)
NRR = Number of reviwers by reviewer (7 points)
1-2 = zero
3-10 = 1
10-15 = 2
15-20 = 3
20-25 = 4
25-30 =5
30-35 = 6
35> = 7
SR = Satsifaction rating ( 10 points)
negative
very dissatisified = 10
dissatsfied = 5
grey = 1
n/a = 2
postive
satisfied = 5
very sat = 10

equation
*IRRS = (3 + 7 + 10)
PIRRS = (TR + NRR + SR)
NIRRS = (TR + NRR + SR)
TRRS = ((SUM(PIRRS)- SUM(NIRRS))/NR)


So you add up your PIRRS and all your NIRRS subtract them from each other and then divide by NR
Ratted reviews have to be discounted as you cannot say did the escort/agancecy leave them
or did a mentalist. Grey reviews and n/a are weighted as slighty NIRRS.

Some examples (I assumed that all reviews gave very satsfied to save time)

kellycurvebaby(10)
(15 + 10 + 20 + 16 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10+11) 122/10 = 12
Kelly Curvybabe, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

anya(8)
Anya, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
(20 + 11 + 15 + 12 + 13 + 11 + 11 + 11) /8 = 104/8 =13

feernado(7)
(50-2)/6 = 48/6 = 8
Fernanda, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

caty(4)
(25 -10)/4 =15/4 = 4
Cathy, Offaly Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

Isabella(2)
(0-12-7)/2 = -19/2 = -10
Isabela, Laois Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

Escorts can be listed by TRRS or NR or (TRRS*NR)
may take some tweaking of variables or perhaps a better way.

I think your idea might be good for a single number, but a punter wants more than just a single number and still doesn't want to be trawling through loads of pages. For me it makes more sense to have a weighted average for each statistic and the punter will have all the information to decide, no need to add them all together at the end for one single number.

So what about a summary of "vital statistics" for the girl? You can also have a breakdown of the review statistics to show who is giving it, was it 10 trusted reviewers or 40 untrusted reviewers. The locations can all be grouped together (for example a girl's location at cork or dublin might be totally different quality/standard). You can then have a weighted average for each statistic which gives the perfect information for him/her, but I don't see why you have to add them all together then as a kind of horse-race between the girls.

I think it would be great to be able to put in a couple of facts about what you wanted (how important location was for you, how important looks were etc.) and E-I recommended an escort for you. They could give you a top ten list that E-I recommended for the age, attractiveness and other criteria you input. Of course the way E-I came up with the recommendations would be all open so people could see where they were getting it from.

[luther]

There was some discussion in this thread
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...r-reviews.html
about this for some reason 4 different mods attacked the idea
in a series of elqoquent attacks?

Where 4 mods "attacked" this idea...........

Otherwise retract the statement................

[whiteknight111]

Where 4 mods "attacked" this idea...........

Otherwise retract the statement................

Luther
"no need for the maths"
Carlos
"you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes"
Highwayman
"it would not be for me. i rather use biological methods"
QPH
"put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads"
"attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.
although carlos did incite we should insert carrots in your anus?

We are taking about generating a table which lists escorts on their relabilty
using there reviews data as input.
This table could be used as a guide/aid in picking a reliable escort.
Its simialar to El Gordos blog but automatic, for all escorts and with more data inputted.
Good escort = 1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ²

Q.E.D.

[luther]

Luther
"no need for the maths"
Carlos
"you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes"
Highwayman
"it would not be for me. i rather use biological methods"
QPH
"put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads"
"attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.
although carlos did incite we should insert carrots in your anus?

I take offence to being accused of attacking an idea with the words "no need for the maths"........

I can't speak for the other mods but I'd like the alligegation withdrawn..........

If people here think a statement like "no need for the maths" is an attack on an idea, a post or a poster them this place has finally gone nuts..........

We are taking about generating a table which lists escorts on their relabilty
using there reviews data as input.
This table could be used as a guide/aid in picking a reliable escort.
Its simialar to El Gordos blog but automatic, for all escorts and with more data inputted.
Good escort = 1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ²

Q.E.D.

While I have no problem with your idea or suggestion it could only ever be used as a guide. These are human beings we're talking about, not machines, and there are so many variables to take into account...........

What I meant by my comment was that people should be able to make up their own minds based on the profile they are viewing and the reviews thay read without the need for a mathamitical formula..........