Originally Posted by
CurvaceousKate
It's always difficult when a review is always going to be one sided. If you look at it logically the person writing the review is much less likely to be aware of their own faults, so he won't realise if he is coming across as 'intense', 'unfriendly', 'bossy' etc. He may not be aware if he has bad breath or even if he has a cheesy cock. So this person, who believes himself/herself to be the perfect client writes a review from the perspective of a 'perfect' client, when the reality may not be quite so true.
They may also have had a really crap day or bad experience previously and be bringing that into the room with them. I've had clients that have lost loved ones, split with their partner or lost their job and they don't tend to tell you this until the end when they have finally relaxed a bit and the tension they are holding is released. Match this up with an Escort who has had several time wasters or a client who didn't understand the word no previously and it's not likely to go that well.
You also have the 'after glow effect'. There are some that believe it is not good to write a review straight after a booking. If you have had a good time (which hopefully you have) and hit that climax, for a short period of time afterwards, you will have an elevated view of the booking and anything that may have annoyed/disappointed before becomes irrelevant or forgotten. Some feel that you should leave it 24 hours before writing the review, as at that point you will have a more balanced view. But then do you? Which is most important? The fact that the Escort sent you to that euphoric state, or the fact that she didn't offer you a drink on entry?
Then there is the type of 'client'. Some prefer to find Escorts that they can see regularly, while others are looking for that 'adrenalin filled wow factor' and nothing else will do. Then you have the 'eclectic' client who likes variety and rarely goes for the same type twice. How do you use a review of that type? Would it be about 'standards' or 'performance' or 'desirability'? Especially if he sometimes likes to go 'outside the box' and not for someone he would typically go for.
Basically there are so many variables and that's just talking about the 'real' reviews.
Negative reviews can often be a product of someones disappointment with themselves, with the situation they find themselves in and for their own mistakes in not doing enough research.
Having said all that, I do sympathise with those who have genuinely been caught out by a bait and switch or have had a below par service where there is no mistaking that the client is not wanted, but then if those Escorts never got a review, would that not work in the same way as a negative?
Lastly, if people put so much credence on reviews... how come the Escorts that don't allow them are still working and making money?