Just a quick poll on how everyone feels about it
You may if you wish (not that it will make any difference) point out the many flaws or the things you like about the 'big change'.
The new site,several months later
Printable View
-
12-01-16, 17:48bettercallsaulThe new site,several months later
-
12-01-16, 18:01Petros
I do like the new site but I'd still like to see a proper chatroom — other than that it's fine!
-
12-01-16, 19:30bettercallsaul
100percent votes so far in favour of the fantastic new site,had petros voted he would have ruined that,lol
-
12-01-16, 19:34PetrosSee how considerate I am for your poll :DQuote:
Originally Posted by bettercallsaul
-
12-01-16, 19:37bettercallsaulI always prefer when the ladies are considering my pole.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petros
-
12-01-16, 19:40PetrosSorry but my consideration only goes so far :boggled:Quote:
Originally Posted by bettercallsaul
-
12-01-16, 20:13bettercallsaul
Finally a vote in favour of the new site,I did wonder when the good people involved would finally get voting,by good people I mean.....nahhh I will leave that to your imaginations ;)
-
12-01-16, 20:26bettercallsaul
In the defence of the new site,apart from the genuine clients and most of the genuine escorts everyone else loves it,that's ok then,right?
-
12-01-16, 20:29willie wackerI love glossy picture,s :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zilch
The search feature is pure shite, I,v stopped trying to use it now and just go through pages and hope for the best , I do believe that,s the reason why they have it that way ;) -
12-01-16, 20:33bettercallsaulOnly a complete moron would think the new site was set up for anything apart from making it easier for the fake profiles and thus more revenue for the company,reading the mod thread pretending it was progress was the last straw for me hence this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by willie wacker
-
12-01-16, 20:36willie wackerI,d say that,s why the fake profile,s have the best glossy picture,s too ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by bettercallsaul
-
12-01-16, 20:37bettercallsaulGiven who is funding the majority of them it is hardly a surprise,maybe I am over thinking,lolQuote:
Originally Posted by willie wacker
-
12-01-16, 20:40xagerate
The new site is pure sh**e
I visit less now purely because I can be arsed clicking on half the usernames that spark an initial interest (Too many are non verified and no reviews allowed)
They should have restricted forum access to those escorts who actuall wanted a forum log in rather than open the floodgates and give everyone a forum presence whether they wanted one or not. -
12-01-16, 20:41bettercallsaulBut suree that would give an advantage to clients and genuine escorts,down with that sort of thinking!Quote:
Originally Posted by xagerate
-
12-01-16, 20:59bettercallsaul
7 percent are happy so far,not as bad as it looks until you see 21 percent voted for ham.
-
12-01-16, 21:22willie wackerSo your basically say over 93% are not happy with the new site :)Quote:
Originally Posted by bettercallsaul
-
12-01-16, 22:20QuattroporteIt has become more suited to fake profiles but that’s unsurprising as E-I has become ever increasingly blatant about catering to, and working hand in glove with agencies, pimps, and criminals.Quote:
Originally Posted by bettercallsaul
None of the members or escorts who post ever question it, as to do so is to be banned. So they all post nonsense or exclusively on their own welcome or new photos thread. No harm, but all the forum is now, is a tool to legitimise E-I and all the underhand tactics they employ to make the industry in Ireland so difficult for genuine independent escorts or even any decent agencies. Ultimately we get the industry and even the forum we deserve.
This forum has become so insipid that a thread is started to bring back tom Rambo. That is the state of affairs.
The first Primetime documentary at least led to a discussion by members and escorts on the forum and response from management even if it has since been seen to be all lies.
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...855#post706855
The latest Primetime documentary caused hardly a ripple except the most members posting that the documentary itself was all lies. -
13-01-16, 01:41bigmango
I have expressed my views on another post.
They failed to engage with the users before they designed the new site.
They assumed they new best and gave us what they thought we needed.
As most people are still using the new site........ they are as happy as pigs in shi.e -
13-01-16, 01:46MALCOLM
There are a few things that have not been sorted yet, the search facility for one is not up to scratch, especially when checking the the larger counties, as for the fake profiles, they are a cash cow so never will be sorted
-
13-01-16, 16:54bettercallsaul
So far 13.33 percent are happy with the new site,If I am honest I expected the vote to be far higher than that,I would like to mention the path of full disclosure the site owners have taken rather than the old system of pretending to give a shit seems to have worked fairly well,I do wonder if it's as I suspect just they don't care or did they expect a better reaction?
-
13-01-16, 17:05bettercallsaulI agree with almost all you said,in truth the second documentary mostly got a reaction of being very one sided,I doubt many if anyone thought it were lies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quattroporte
With that said your post is excellent. -
13-01-16, 18:28mmmm
I was pleasantly surprised that something I mentioned was changed (the pointless redirect to your dashboard from the various pages of the site to your dashboard), but when you log in from the forum you still get redirected to the bloody dashboard :D
What I'd love is a feature that I could tick a box not only for "allows reviews" but also for "HAS reviews", so that I don't have to look at any profiles with zero reviews...
Sounds like that'll never happen though if the site has actually been changed to make fakes easier.