if they are sexually active I think its common sense to do so sexual behavior has changed over the past few years mainly due to the media portraying sex on a continual basis look around u -sticking your fingers in your ears & repeating ''they're too young for sex'' isn't going to make them have less sex better to give them the pill than having children or abortions ...
the pill for U-16's?
Printable View
-
12-08-10, 17:25Experienced Punter esqthe pill for U-16's?
-
12-08-10, 17:28WestsidexYes but just as with everyone else ,you have stupid U16 year olds and intelligent U16 years olds. The stupid ones will always engage in unprotected sex, the intelligent ones or should i say the ones with cop on wont. Its not the amount of years someone has but the amount of copon that they have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Experienced Punter esq
simple as that,
Westside. -
12-08-10, 19:13DoozerI have to agree with you EX P. These days people are having sex earlier than ever. People can blame teh media or bad parenting till tehy are blue in the face its not going to change. I think oner of the main reasons against it is taht it may encourage these children to engage in sexual activity. In my own opinon that wont really matter, and wouldnt it be better to keep these people safe from teen aged pregnancy than worry about our own moral stance on what age two kids can have sexQuote:
Originally Posted by Experienced Punter esq