Pope 'has no UK arrest immunity' - Yahoo! News UK
Printable View
He is right. The clown should be arrested although that will never happen. FFS he is full of shit. A hypocrite. He talks through his anus about World poverty and look at the wealth the prick has? Heres one. why doesnt the Vatican house homeless ppl or sick ppl?
they dont want to ,
Westside.
Bless you my son. Your not backwards about coming forwards are you Westie. But you may just have a point
http://richandjen.us/coppermine/albu...Benedictus.jpg
Followed by
http://www.t-shirthumor.com/Merchant...ze/tpnp_lg.gif
When you think about how alot of these bishops etc are so slow to resign. I wonder would it have to do with them being less off financially?
Probably,
Westside.
Of course it would, but you also have to remember if it wernt for the church what else would they be doing. They gave their lives to it and probably dont know what else they could do after that
Richard Dawkins did NOT say that. Take a look at what he actually said:
'Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of Pope Benedict XVI' by [UPDATE 4-12] Marc Horne - TimesOnline - RichardDawkins.netQuote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dawkins on his website on April 11, 2010 at 8:48 am
Personally I would be totally against the arresting of the pope. If the pope were to be arrested, it would be because of his current position and not to do with his actual alleged crimes.
I bet the people shouting loudest for it have no clue what he's even supposed to have done. All they're doing is taking some cherry-picked words from letters he wrote decades ago. There were indeed some bishops, cardinals etc. in the church that did appear to protect abusers, in particular moving them along from one parish to another one with few people knowing anything about it.
As head of a large corperation, the pope is entitled to the money that he's made. Right now he's being harassed and slandered by people (including Richard Dawkins, but not as much as that ridiculous headline would suggest), and he could very well have a case against those people. Dawkins has nothing on him so he can't just slander him.
How is the Pope entitled to the money. Isnt he supposed to have taken a vow of poverty
http://icarusone.files.wordpress.com...posessions.gif
stupid thread
keep the faith.......