Discretion about location in reviews

Why on earth would a guy submit a review with the EXACT address? A review was posted with number, apartment complex, town!!!

We live each day with threats, extortion, fear of being asked to leave, Gardai turning up. When an exact address is submitted everyone including our neighbours & Gardai now know what's going on which in turn leaves us in a vunerable position of being attacked/robbed/turfed out.

There is no justification for submitting the exact address, an area is more than sufficient such as: D9/Cashel/Newbridge

Sandy of Newcastle x

Hi Sandy,

Do you have a link to this review? This should not go up!

Sam x

It was posted last week & has now been modified thanks.

Thanks for letting me know. :) x

It strikes me as very naive of someone to post an exact address. it serves no purpose,its one thing leaving a review to help in choosing an escort,its a different story giving address'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nicechap

It strikes me as very naive of someone to post an exact address. it serves no purpose,its one thing leaving a review to help in choosing an escort,its a different story giving address'

---

It also strikes me as being a responsibility of the review moderators as well

From FAQs & Rules about the Escort Ireland Irish Escort Reviews System

Quote:

---

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

---

So, yes, that review should never have been posted unedited.

I should be a reviews moderator. I have a very high command of English and a very low tolerance for fools. I would enjoy bringing down the ban hammer on someone who has misused an apostrophe, omitted punctuation, or simply because they had a silly username.

*cough*