Whats with the ****** ** in reviews?

Heres a sample of a review:
"Not exacty sure of time but it was in Dublin end of December
sounded fine on the phone
ok appartment
much older than photos
looks around 46
very poor and agresive attitude
*****8888
loves the money and no genuine ***
*** ***** and a if required extra too
I certainly would not recomend"

What's with the stars?
Is it being censored?
Can't make head or tail of some of them lol

Have to agree, just read a review on Barbara and I haven't a clue what she did or didn't do, seemed to be good though.

that review was originally written about me

The **'s are put in place when lady chooses not to have explicit reviews written about her. I take this option.

I didnt realise that they would be explicit anyway and be ***ed out.. i thought the guys would just write them in a more gentlemanly way!

I added a rebuttal to that review because it was fake...
..only for the author to contact admin and say he wrote it aabout someone else and put my name in by mistake!?!?!?

You really have to wonder about some people..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UKHeather

that review was originally written about me

The **'s are put in place when lady chooses not to have explicit reviews written about her. I take this option.

I didnt realise that they would be explicit anyway and be ***ed out.. i thought the guys would just write them in a more gentlemanly way!

I added a rebuttal to that review because it was fake...
..only for the author to contact admin and say he wrote it aabout someone else and put my name in by mistake!?!?!?

You really have to wonder about some people..

---

It wasn't one of yours but that may explain it.
But looking at it again I'm guessing 'GFE' has been starred and 'GFE extra' may be the other bit??

How the hell is GFE explicit ???? For ****'s sake ??:)

It was one of mine until he contacted admin to have it changed to a different lady's name. If I hadnt written a reply to it... it may have been left under my name. It's been sitting as a neg review for me until this evening. Maybe a simple mistake on his part.. but not great for me.
One of the *** was gfe yes... not explicit I agree.
The other was cim being extra and i can't remember what the bit with the 888's was, sorry..
It must have been edited manually as it read differently, earlier.

Just remembered, the ***888 was poor service