Is there a small glitch in the system in the "Top 30 Reviewed Escorts", where the number of the reviews shown doesn't match the actual count of the reviews OR is the top now finally done excluding all the ratted reviews?
If my last guess is right, well done :clapping:
It would be nice also not to count the N/A reviews there as well. If they are "not applicable" from a review point of view, I don't think they should matter too much in the "Top 30" list either.
What is the story with this :D
Review Count on "Top 30" is slightly off
Printable View
-
07-03-10, 01:04Karin KissReview Count on "Top 30" is slightly off
-
07-03-10, 01:08PatriciaYou are correct, ratted reviews now excluded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karin Kiss
-
07-03-10, 01:08Quarterpoundher
It was discussed by mods and Patricia asked our views on ratted ones being included in the tally and although she did not say what she intended doing I assume that what you noticed is E-I now not counting ratted ones to determine the top Escorts by number of reviews.
-
07-03-10, 01:11Karin Kiss
Well, I have to say I am impressed. Rats not counting in the top list is definitely a very good idea!