What is the point in myself leaving a review of a recent escort, a bad review, and then she has the right to opt out of reviews. Escorts should only have the right to opt out at the very start of joining, not when they receive a bad review. Further more having been ripped off frequently with escorts having pictures that are not of themselves, I now believe that if you dont have genuine pictures and if you cant have them certified, then you shouldnt have any pictures showing on your profile. Also I stated in my review of Francesca in Dublin on 20/03/2010 she does not do OWO or french kissing so why are you permitting her to still advertise these things on her website. Another con artist, using pictures that are not of herself. Advertising that she does certain things but when she arrives says no. So what do I do? I reported her in my review that her pictures are false, that she doesnt do OWO or french kissing and what happens? She reads the review and then opts out of the system. So what happens when the next sucker comes along and sees nice pictures but no review? He books her and off we go again. But we punters dont have the right to express ourselves, nor the right to warn or be warned about these con artist. Its time E-I started looking after the punters.
False pictures and services
Printable View
-
23-03-10, 01:39jas0n1False pictures and services
-
23-03-10, 08:06zicooo
could not agree more, several times i complained about "Monique" who is not a busty asian but a skinny brazilian, but still her profile remains in spite of another recent complaint, revenue before service it appears
-
23-03-10, 10:57Sarah
In my opinion this website do lots to satisfy punters, am I wrong?
Many members of the forum thinks that E-I should take a responsibility for photos, details, services, quality of the appintment etc
I do agree that E-I is here to help however E-I is not an escort agency, we do not have more information about escorts then these which are showen on the profiles.
Sarah -
23-03-10, 16:45berVerifiedWell that is fair enough, what u are saying is u are just publishing the imformation u are given by the escortsQuote:
Originally Posted by Sarah
well if that is the case then u should not have photos which are claimed to be verified when in fact u have no
way of knowing if they are real or not,so i think u should have a disclaimer on the profiles saying that this
is the information we have been supplied with and that we have no way of knowing whether it is correct or not.
At least then the clients warned and may take extra steps to try find out on the phone who or what services are
avaliable in otherwards a case of buyer beware -
23-03-10, 16:59SarahYou are being childish now, berQuote:
Originally Posted by ber
Sarah -
24-03-10, 12:07jas0n1Thank you for your response. However am I correct in saying that these escorts pay for their profiles on E-I? So therefore you accept the money but then wash your hands off any complaints. You accept pictures and put them on display stating pictures certified or not certified. My argument now is that if the escort does not prove that they are genuine, they should not be allowed up on a profile until they are. That is so easy to do. Even an escort with a mobile phone can take a picture of herself with a local daily paper as proof. Then we the punters will know that they are genuine. Escorts are stealing pictures that have no resemblance of themselves, pictures that are up to 10 or 15 years old. If a punter comes back and says the escort does not do this or that, then let this be known on a review. I wrote a review and it was published the next day, to warn future punters that she was not genuine. The escort reads it and then opts out of the review system. While you might be giving her the choice of reviews, you are not being truthful to the punters. Its bad enough escorts starting off with opting out of the review system but when those that dont opt out at the start see a review that is showing them up to be con artists they just opt out and you permit them. This is not right, either opt out before you start but not in between. What would you suggest we punters do? If they turn up and there not who they say they are or when you get into the room and discover that they dont do what they have stated on their profiles and perhaps its an outcall in a hotel, do we say away you go and perhaps cause a disturbance for you and the hotel? So please advise what we should do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah
-
24-03-10, 17:18english rebecca
What about when girls get bad reviews from local pressure groups or pimps. This is when a few girls i know have opted out.a negative review is not always a genuine bad review either.
Ei can only go as far as to verify pictures as they beleive to be accurate. They have not meet the advertisers as they are not an agency.at the end of the day punters like escorts need to go on their own judgement when it comes to making/taking bookings.
Jason, if you have concerns, then see an escort who is well reviewed by well known reviewers as there are many.also you should always clarify services offered as there are times when a girl canot offer kissing /owo as advertised or if the client we feel is not clean enough.
I always say its at my discretion, which does not mean i do not offer my listed favorites, however, enables me to ensure i am comfortable offering these services to said clients in a clean and safe manner.
If you clarify offered services on the day of booking and stick with the reviewed it will stand you in better stead.
Ultimately it is your decision who you book and nobody but yourself is responsible for discussing your needs with your chosen escort prior to the booking.
Also its annoying when clients request services not listed. If they are not listed, then as a rule the escort dont do it.
E reb