Sophie in Cork

This review, if it qualifies to be called a review, is seriously unfair
https://www.escort-ireland.com/3075/Sophie/review.html

I am one of the people to review her positively as that genuinely reflects my experience with her. Most of the negative reviews I also believe to be genuine as I can totally see where they are coming from.

I think the above should be removed as it serves absolutely no purpose.

Ok, I will uphold this complaint and remove the review as I see the client did not see the lady. If he wanted to make the comments he did, he should have posted them on the message board, not as a review. Consider it due to be removed very shortly.

west could learn a lot from this little post ............... a punter posts a legitimate complaint for a valid reason in an articulate manner and Patricia summarily deals with the issue in a prompt and very satisfactory way, simple!!

Paws

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigpaws

west could learn a lot from this little post ............... a punter posts a legitimate complaint for a valid reason in an articulate manner and Patricia summarily deals with the issue in a prompt and very satisfactory way, simple!!

Paws

---

Yes absolutely - I think there are a few here that could learn from this simple exchange.

And - Patricia, thanks for your quick reply.

I would agree that only where somebody actually sees an escort should this be considered a review any thing else should go on the mesage board
A review should be based on what actually happens in the room during ure alloted time because i think most clients will agree that if service is very good other things like location ;puncuality;etc become minor issues where if service is poor they take on a greater significance.personally for me the service is every thing a nice location might add to a good service but it defenitely wont improve a bad one.
this is the opinion of somebody who had a very negative experience with sophie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by punterminator

And - Patricia, thanks for your quick reply.

---

No thank you punterminator for pointing out we had approved a review which was apparently not from someone who had met or had any dealings with the lady personally and thus was not a valid review.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ber

I would agree that only where somebody actually sees an escort should this be considered a review any thing else should go on the mesage board
A review should be based on what actually happens in the room during ure alloted time because i think most clients will agree that if service is very good other things like location ;puncuality;etc become minor issues where if service is poor they take on a greater significance.personally for me the service is every thing a nice location might add to a good service but it defenitely wont improve a bad one.
this is the opinion of somebody who had a very negative experience with sophie

---

Ber I would strongly disagree with your assertion here.

If an escort has a history of unpredictability, ie, wasting clients time by making the appointment but not answering the phone when he gets there, calling or texting clients without the clients permission, looking for extra cash for services that are advertised as favourites or a general bad attitude then a review would be valid and worthwhile even if it never got to the point where the knickers came off.

Posting comments about timewasters and escorts looking for extras etc... on the message boards means that after a short time they disappear down the boards and are quickly forgotten whereas comments written in a review are in the one place and easily accessed.

Where I would agree with you is that a review is unwarranted and unjustified when some guy can't get through on the phone to the escort to make an appointment and then slags the escort off because of this by writing a review.

I am not specifically talking about Sophie here as she has had enough shite thrown at her recently, some possibly deserved, some possibly not.