Eotm

i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm

---

Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!

---

That seems to knock out escorts who don't allow reviews.

my fav does not currently advertise.

unfare?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bollocks

That seems to knock out escorts who don't allow reviews.

---

It is the escorts own choice whether they allow reviews or not - if they don't want to participate in the review system of which EOTM is part of then that is their choice!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

Only reviews from reviewers with more than 10 reviews are eligible and it must be their first review for that escort — repeat reviews don't count!

The problem for us it that we can't see if a review is a repeat review or not!

---

repeat review hardly applies in this case as new ladies .
maybe rule is that review is counted as date submitted and not date lady was visited .if that is case surely it is then open to abuse .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

repeat review hardly applies in this case as new ladies .
maybe rule is that review is counted as date submitted and not date lady was visited .if that is case surely it is then open to abuse .

---

As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.

---

am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
ps i am open to be corrected .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

As the winner this month has reviews going back over a year I'd hardly call her "new". The repeat review rule could very easily come into play!

It is the date the meeting took place that is counted but it must be submitted with in the same month as well in order to be counted.

---

I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
ps i am open to be corrected .

---

The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so therefore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JAMESCORK

I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.



The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so theretofore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.

---

Yep your 100% correct
I don,t think they are going to make the same mistake twice :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willie wacker

Yep your 100% correct
I don,t think they are going to make the same mistake twice :rolleyes:

---

The new system does get complicated when two girls have the same number of qualifying reviews. It moves into the calculation of star rating first, and then into "would recommend" and "would see again" next.

Older method was a tad easier... :D

I though a red review disqualifyed you its more complicated than the fifa rankings haha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by celticden

I though a red review disqualifyed you its more complicated than the fifa rankings haha

---

No, just a negative point score...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by celticden

I though a red review disqualifyed you its more complicated than the fifa rankings haha

---

If you get a red review in the month in question then it,s a -1 for that month only.
If you got a red review 2 months ago then that doe,s not come into the equation for this month.
Just because a girl got a red review doe,s not mean she cannot win EOTM

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JAMESCORK

I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.



The correct girl has won based on the three examples you have given.

The Annabelle that has won has five qualifying reviews. Qualifying means the reviewer is a member more than 6 months and has 10 reviews or more.
The Annabelle in Dublin 1 has also 5 qualifying reviews, but one reviewer has reviewed her twice (paddywillie), so therefore she has 4 really. The fact she also has a red review gives her a -1 score, thus bringing down her score again.
Katty has 4 qualifying reviews so not in the running.

---

many thanks James i always find you an informative and very reliable contributor
rules are rules but find it very unusual that date review submitted is counted and not date of visit
congratulations Anabella and thanks again James

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

am still in dark .repeat reviews should really not apply to two ladies who are new[ not talking about winner] .what i meant by original point
if it is true that date meeting took place is one that applies my original point that review that is listed for 27/1/2016 should not be counted and by my calculations leaves winner with just 4 eligible review
ps i am open to be corrected .

---

I see 5 possible reviews for Anabella that could count towards ETOM

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JAMESCORK

I'm fairly sure its the date the review is submitted rather that the day the meeting took place. You have 30 days to submit a review I believe.

---

You may be correct there James. The rules state The month that the escort is announced the winner will be the winner based on the points totalled from the previous month; i.e. 'Miss September' is calculated from the reviews submitted in August, and so on.

But I can see a flaw in that as there is a danger the competition could be manumitted. A reviewer has 28 days to submit a review. If an escort was to ask a client to delay submitting the review until the following month she could effect get two months of reviews submitted in a single month giving her an unfair advantage in the competition.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

You may be correct there James. The rules state The month that the escort is announced the winner will be the winner based on the points totalled from the previous month; i.e. 'Miss September' is calculated from the reviews submitted in August, and so on.

But I can see a flaw in that as there is a danger the competition could be manumitted. A reviewer has 28 days to submit a review. If an escort was to ask a client to delay submitting the review until the following month she could effect get two months of reviews submitted in a single month giving her an unfair advantage in the competition.

---

And do think it has never been manipulated in the pass :)
The rules are there for all to follow and as ever body knows, rule,s are bent to suit one,s needs in all walks of life :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willie wacker

And do think it has never been manipulated in the pass :)
The rules are there for all to follow and as ever body knows, rule,s are bent to suit one,s needs in all walks of life :)

---

I never implied either way - I was mearly pointing out that if the actual date of the meeting does not have to be in the preceding month then it would be possible to carry forward 28 days of reviews and add then to the preceding month of the award!

Whether it has been done in the past or not is a different matter.

Personally I think it is a flaw in the rules it that is the case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

I never implied either way - I was mearly pointing out that if the actual date of the meeting does not have to be in the preceding month then it would be possible to carry forward 28 days of reviews and add then to the preceding month of the award!

Whether it has been done in the past or not is a different matter.

Personally I think it is a flaw in the rules it that is the case.

---

I never said you did,
I,m just stating the fact that rule,s are bent in all walks of life to suit one,s needs and just not here.
No rule,s are 100% right and they will never be perfect but it,s what it is in all competitions.
Regardless weather we like them or not then they are the rule,s that we have to go by.
There are some rule,s in EOTM I don,t agree with either but that,s life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Petros

You may be correct there James. The rules state The month that the escort is announced the winner will be the winner based on the points totalled from the previous month; i.e. 'Miss September' is calculated from the reviews submitted in August, and so on.

But I can see a flaw in that as there is a danger the competition could be manumitted. A reviewer has 28 days to submit a review. If an escort was to ask a client to delay submitting the review until the following month she could effect get two months of reviews submitted in a single month giving her an unfair advantage in the competition.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willie wacker

I never said you did,
I,m just stating the fact that rule,s are bent in all walks of life to suit one,s needs and just not here.
No rule,s are 100% right and they will never be perfect but it,s what it is in all competitions.
Regardless weather we like them or not then they are the rule,s that we have to go by.
There are some rule,s in EOTM I don,t agree with either but that,s life.

---

Planing and winning EOTM is a doddle.... :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JAMESCORK

Planing and winning EOTM is a doddle.... :D

---

Lol
Don,t say that to Rachel or she will kill you :lmao::lmao:
No that,s what I mean by bending the rule,s
And know where and when to tour ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willie wacker

If you get a red review in the month in question then it,s a -1 for that month only.
If you got a red review 2 months ago then that doe,s not come into the equation for this month.
Just because a girl got a red review doe,s not mean she cannot win EOTM

---

You have to be special lady to get a "red"review ":D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redforever

You have to be special lady to get a "red"review ":D

---

Jesus I cringe :banghead:
Where did I go wrong :mad:
I'd say they hope you never give a review so or they will never win EOTM :bigok:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

i am probably stupid

---

hhahahahahaha

Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

i am probably stupid but cannot understand marking for eotm
Anabella 4 eligible reviews 17/18/19/21/ one review listed as 3 weeks ago but is 27/1/2016 and not eligible so. total 10 reviews for month all5 star
Anabelle in dublin1 5 eligible review 2/2/17/19/20 total 10 reviews 8 5star 1 4star 1red star
Katty in letterkenny 4 eligible reviews10/13/18/26 total12 reviews all5star

---

Hello everyone and a very good morning!!

Very quickly I would like to address the question of eligibility – there are 2 things:
Review submission (creation) date and booking date.

We are looking at the reviews creation date - taking into account all reviews received between 01/02/2016 00.00.01 and 29/02/19 23.59.59.
As you are aware you can write a review for an appointment taking place up to 28 days back.
I see no point in double filtering and missing some reviews out.

Either that or we would have to announce the winners with a month’s delay.

If we wanted to make sure that we look at the booking date too, then we only could announce the winner 28 days after each month’s end.
Then we would only be sure that all the reviews for this month’s appointments are in.

As it is today, we base the scores on the reviews received that month.

This means that today (06/03/16), you can write a review for an escort reviewing a booking which took place on 27/02/16.
This review will no longer be counted towards the last Escort of the Months, as we have closed that month and announced the winner, however your review will count towards the next month’s competition.
Otherwise it would be lost in translation and score no points as submitted after the month’s end.

I hope this clears the eligibility issues.

Then there are few more factors on the top of that, to protect the system from abuse.

We only count the reviews from established users.
Ratted reviews award negative points
Only the first review counts from the same punter for the same escort towards the EOM competition.

Although we are allowing you to review the same lady even once a week, the rules to the EOM did not change.
It is only the first review that you submitted for that escort (ever) that will count.
Even if it was in 2013.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

maybe it is me but find it very confusing .would it be possible to list eligible reviews and points allocated at time of announcing eotm

---

In answer to your question, this would be manual as the new system, just gives us the winner.
We have no longer access got to the table, where we would observe the stats every day, hour, minute.
This was done on purpose as in the past escorts would enquire half month through, how are the stats looking and push some reviews.

We could maybe meet half way there and provide you them on request?
I have got nothing to hide, it is simply a ball ache. I have spent 2 days only sorting out forums drama and re-counting the reviews.
Don't get me wrong, I love my job, I am just aware that you needed me elsewhere (for example on the Pandora thread) and my time had to go here instead.

Now, going back to numbers, if this brings you some consolation, knowing that we did not just select this month’s winner at random.
Anabella had 6 eligible reviews (created between 01/02/16 and 29/02/19), Jessyca Wild 5, Apple 5, Katty and Bridgitte 4.

As usual let us know if you have any further questions or suggestions.

So what your saying is if a lady was shrewd enough and really wanting to win eotm she could get her clients from the previous month to hold off writing a review for her until the current month plus her actual reviews for the current month also ? ?

http://memesvault.com/wp-content/upl...lm-Meme-04.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redforever

So what your saying is if a lady was shrewd enough and really wanting to win eotm she could get her clients from the previous month to hold off writing a review for her until the current month plus her actual reviews for the current month also ? ?

---

Jasus your slow this weather :o
The 2 years in jail has taken its toll on you
Did it ever occur to you that a girl with over 300 reviews has never won ???
Careful planning is the key to success ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LuckyLu

Hello everyone and a very good morning!!

Very quickly I would like to address the question of eligibility – there are 2 things:
Review submission (creation) date and booking date.

We are looking at the reviews creation date - taking into account all reviews received between 01/02/2016 00.00.01 and 29/02/19 23.59.59.
As you are aware you can write a review for an appointment taking place up to 28 days back.
I see no point in double filtering and missing some reviews out.

Either that or we would have to announce the winners with a month’s delay.

If we wanted to make sure that we look at the booking date too, then we only could announce the winner 28 days after each month’s end.
Then we would only be sure that all the reviews for this month’s appointments are in.

As it is today, we base the scores on the reviews received that month.

This means that today (06/03/16), you can write a review for an escort reviewing a booking which took place on 27/02/16.
This review will no longer be counted towards the last Escort of the Months, as we have closed that month and announced the winner, however your review will count towards the next month’s competition.
Otherwise it would be lost in translation and score no points as submitted after the month’s end.

I hope this clears the eligibility issues.

Then there are few more factors on the top of that, to protect the system from abuse.

We only count the reviews from established users.
Ratted reviews award negative points
Only the first review counts from the same punter for the same escort towards the EOM competition.

Although we are allowing you to review the same lady even once a week, the rules to the EOM did not change.
It is only the first review that you submitted for that escort (ever) that will count.
Even if it was in 2013.



In answer to your question, this would be manual as the new system, just gives us the winner.
We have no longer access got to the table, where we would observe the stats every day, hour, minute.
This was done on purpose as in the past escorts would enquire half month through, how are the stats looking and push some reviews.

We could maybe meet half way there and provide you them on request?
I have got nothing to hide, it is simply a ball ache. I have spent 2 days only sorting out forums drama and re-counting the reviews.
Don't get me wrong, I love my job, I am just aware that you needed me elsewhere (for example on the Pandora thread) and my time had to go here instead.

Now, going back to numbers, if this brings you some consolation, knowing that we did not just select this month’s winner at random.
Anabella had 6 eligible reviews (created between 01/02/16 and 29/02/19), Jessyca Wild 5, Apple 5, Katty and Bridgitte 4.

As usual let us know if you have any further questions or suggestions.

---

sorry.do not want to be picky .maybe i am blind as well as stupid but can only see 5 eligible reviews on list not 6
date of visit 27/1.17/2.18/2.19/2.21/2. reviewers 30/47/21/41/15reviews .do not know where no 6 comes from sorry again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

sorry.do not want to be picky .maybe i am blind as well as stupid but can only see 5 eligible reviews on list not 6
date of visit 27/1.17/2.18/2.19/2.21/2. reviewers 30/47/21/41/15reviews .do not know where no 6 comes from sorry again

---

Hey, neither blind nor stupid.

We simply have got access to more data hence you do not get the full picture and thus it might seem that there are some discrepancies.

Not sure if you are aware that when an escort is opting out of the reviews your reviews of this escort are not showing. There are still active and approved, but not displayed.
This means that on the website the amount of your reviews (in brackets) changes as per the number of the reviews currently being published.

(Hence all those questions appearing now and then "why is my review missing?")

Although the number might seem lower, you might have written more reviews, they are just not showing at the moment.
But in our eyes you are still meeting the 10+ criteria, if you have submitted 10th review and we have it published.

This does not include the reviews that are on hold, under investigation or deleted, however does includes all published, but hidden reviews.

For this reason it seems that Wirakoch has 9 reviews and is not eligible, but some of the reviews he produced are hidden as the escort(s) has(ve) opted out of the reviews.
In reality he has got more than 10.

[QUOTE=LuckyLu;1726250]Hey, neither blind nor stupid.

We simply have got access to more data hence you do not get the full picture and thus it might seem that there are some discrepancies.

Not sure if you are aware that when an escort is opting out of the reviews your reviews of this escort are not showing. There are still active and approved, but not displayed.
This means that on the website the amount of your reviews (in brackets) changes as per the number of the reviews currently being published.

(Hence all those questions appearing now and then "why is my review missing?")

Although the number might seem lower, you might have written more reviews, they are just not showing at the moment.
But in our eyes you are still meeting the 10+ criteria, if you have submitted 10th review and we have it published.

This does not include the reviews that are on hold, under investigation or deleted, however does includes all published, but hidden reviews.

For this reason it seems that Wirakoch has 9 reviews and is not eligible, but some of the reviews he produced are hidden as the escort(s) has(ve) opted out of the reviews.
In reality he has got more than 10.[/QU

many thanks it gets more confusing by the minute i give up .transparency .many thanks again i give up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willie wacker

Jasus your slow this weather :o
The 2 years in jail has taken its toll on you
Did it ever occur to you that a girl with over 300 reviews has never won ???
Careful planning is the key to success ;)

---

I'm going to have to plan sophie's tours better :p

So Lu in short.

What your saying
A person might only show that he has written 9 reviews and hence in our eye,s is not eligible
But in fact he might have written , say 15, but because ladies have opted out or retired he has gone down to 9
But you in the background know that and you take their vote into account
Well hopefully that clear,s that up for once and all :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by easygo

many thanks it gets more confusing by the minute i give up .transparency .many thanks again i give up

---

no need to give up, just ask me if you are unsure.
or you can ask fellow forums users, they will confirm that this is the case.

I am happy to provide details of how we do things here, where I can.

Xxx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LuckyLu

no need to give up, just ask me if you are unsure.
or you can ask fellow forums users, they will confirm that this is the case.

I am happy to provide details of how we do things here, where I can.

Xxx

---

many thanks for help .did not mean i am giving up any pleasures and do find forum users help
what i meant is giving up trying to figure out scoring system for eotm. too complicated .could find something nicer and less complicated to occupy myself with .
thanks xx