Hi folks
Made a report about 2 weeks ago that Mary from City West was not the girl in the photos...
Mary, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
For whatever reason EI don't believe me or blah blah blah.
All I can say is I turned up to meet a girl with zero resemblance.
When I showed her the profile on my phone she chuckled and said "oh that's not me..."
I left pronto. Place was also grubby as hell.
So FYI...don't bother....
Wiggidy
Mary City West fake photo report ignored
Printable View
-
07-02-11, 11:28WiggidyMary City West fake photo report ignored
-
07-02-11, 12:43anon361I would have contacted Ad Staff with my concerns rather than submitting a report without any real proof. Maybe when they read this they will request a new verification picture?.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
In the mean time you are within the rules to submit a review as you met the lady but didn't go ahead with services, if you select that choice not only can you write down your grievance but you also get the drop down options on accuracy of pictures etc which will warn future clients that may not get to see this thread or even remember it in a few weeks.. -
07-02-11, 12:46samladDid you submit a fake photo report via the link on the escort profile, providing links or other bits of evidence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
-
07-02-11, 16:23jayf1
i think the evidence he has is that he went and met her now unless he brought a video camera with him he wont have any real evidence just his word.
-
07-02-11, 16:25Lucy ChambersIsnt the best evidence the client saying it isnt the lady? I was told that was why N/A reviews had to exist, so that clients can say it isnt the one in the pictures.Quote:
Originally Posted by jayf1
-
07-02-11, 16:28jayf1
dont take me up wrong lucy i was not saying that his word should be taking as fact.
i wouldnt take his word on it but i would wait and see how many others have the same experience with that escort and then make up my own mind. -
07-02-11, 16:30anon361Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
My point is he hasn't even submitted a review...Quote:
Originally Posted by jayf1
-
07-02-11, 16:40Lucy ChambersI thought he had and it was rejected. Sorry, I need to get my reading glasses :)Quote:
Originally Posted by anon361
-
07-02-11, 16:49Wiggidy
Two links at the bottom of her profile. Submit review and submit fake photo report which I did.
Her pics went from verified to awaiting verification back to verified.
I'm not sure what other proof you'd like. I'll post again when I have a gazillion posts and am part of the clique.
Maybe then I'll be believed...
Sorry I bothered tbh -
07-02-11, 16:53anon361It's not like that mate, if I submit a report saying a lady isn't the one I met without any other evidence I too would expect the report to be rejected. I don't know why your review wasn't activated, maybe you should send a PM to one of the review mods: View Profile: JohnRambo - Escort Ireland Community or View Profile: thehighwayman - Escort Ireland Community and I am sure either would be more than helpful in explaining why it may have been rejected so that you could re-submit it with a better understanding of the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
-
07-02-11, 17:07samladNot really. You'd be surprised how many bitter clients try to put an escort down because so won't provide a particular favourite.Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
-
07-02-11, 18:29sharkskin
Hi Wiggidy
Folks have read the line above and have understood it to mean that you submitted both a review and a fake photo report. I'm not sure. Have you submitted a review or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
If not, then I would encourage you to submit one. You can say that you turned up and were met by a lady who was not the lady in the pics. I can see no reason why such a review will not be accepted and I think that everyone here would encourage you to do that.
Unfortunately, that is how it works. If you look at the site policy for fake photo reports, you will see that until you are better known, fake photo reports will only be accepted if they are accompanied by a link to another site on the web where the photos can be seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
I know it seems unfair but the site admins have to get a balance between allowing clients to post warnings and protecting hard working escorts from posters who are out to harm their businesses. I am not suggesting for one moment that you fall into that category but you are a new poster and the site does have an established and published policy. -
07-02-11, 18:48Lucy ChambersOh, ok. So what is the need for NA reviews then? If no money has changed hands why should the client be able to leave an N/A, if not to say it wasnt the lady in the pictures?Quote:
Originally Posted by samlad
-
07-02-11, 18:53samladIf we are sure that a review was for an escort that wasn't in the picture, then technically the review should be invalid as it isn't the same picture, in the instances that the pictures are verified. These reviews have been deleted as far as I'm aware. If the pictures aren't verified, it's a bit hit and miss, I know.Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
-
07-02-11, 18:53El Gordo
I've asked escorts how photo verification works. Based on what they said, I concluded that it's a complete waste of time. To be fair to E-I,
- there is no real way they could verify photos, and
- other sites also claim to, so if E-I didn't go through the charade then they would be losing out. -
07-02-11, 18:59sharkskinOf course it is legit to post an N/A review if the photos do not match but there are other circumstances:Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
How about:
I turned up and rang and nobody answered the phone.
I turned up and rang and her pimp answered the door.
The room was so tiny that there was only a single bed in it and even then the door could not open the whole way as it hit the bed - plus I was only offered a shower with cold water.
All legit reasons. -
07-02-11, 19:11Lucy ChambersI see your point but those reviews still puzzle me.Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkskin
If money hasn't changed hands though what right have you to comment? The review process is supposed to reflect the time you had with a lady, not the time you had with her furnishings.
I understand the need to alert people but I an unsure you should be allowed to trash someones business if you didnt actually lose money. -
07-02-11, 19:41sharkskinThose are fair points Lucy but I still think that such reviews are valid.Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
My comment about a tiny room and lack of hot water were about premises, not furnishings and the escort was clearly making a business decision to save money by cutting corners on the facilities while charging as much as the competition working from top quality apartments.
While I may not have lost cash, I have lost two other things that are actually more important to me than the cash:
First, I have lost my time. My last attempted punt involved a 45 minute journey there and another 45 minutes back to try to see a lady who didn't pick up the phone. Indeed, given that I had a client who was willing to pay for that hour and a half if I would have been working for him, I did lose money.
Secondly, I have lost an opportunity. My punting is always limited by the availability of opportunities not money. -
07-02-11, 19:44Lucy ChambersHmm. Ok. I shall concede.Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkskin
Mutter mutter :D -
07-02-11, 21:39WiggidyI'm not actually. I've had a previous account since about 2006 but changed due to my username being too like my nickname used by my friends.Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkskin
I've seen age old threads time and time again about the apparent "difficulty" in verified pics.
Digital cameras. A4 paper and black markers are within everyones reach.
A simple pic of the lady holding the paper with "Escort-Ireland" on it is the way forward...and I guarantee punters would rather see a real pic of the lady that one thats photoshopped to shit, only for them to come on here and moan that it "Looks nothing like the girl."
All I can say is that I have better things to do than put people down. I'm not into any kinky stuff that people turn there noses at, and I can give you a list as long as my arm of girls that will testify to that one. So while your statement may have its truths, its not relevant in this case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samlad
In fact the girl in question was very polite about the whole thing, but like I say, chuckled when I showed her the profile pic in question, leading me to believe the whole verified pics thing is a bit of a joke. -
07-02-11, 22:08El GordoThis is more or less what they do now. It's worthless. Any agency will have lots of ladies and will have no trouble getting such a photo with someone hot looking, and they can then stick whoever they want in that apartment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggidy
-
08-02-11, 00:54Wiggidy
Review submitted.
-
08-02-11, 09:08scotus
I have had a couple of photo reports ignored.
For example, yesterday I reported Sunny, whose pic appears 16 times in various web pages picked up by Tin Eye https://www.escort-ireland.com/18529/Sunny/irish-escort.html
For example:
http://nyan2kuroda.blog39.fc2.com/blog-category-26.html -
11-02-11, 17:13anon361Just to follow up on this post, I decided to test my reponse and submitted a report for a lady I have visited, at the time I commented on how it wasn't the lady on the profile although I did go ahead with the appointment as the lady I met was still quit attractive, she then verified her pictures on and off, each time I put a note on my review when they were genuine and when they weren't, anyway they currently aren't her so I submitted a report with nothing but my word to go by which for most is all they would need but not E-I, the report was declined and deleted off my reports so you're not alone mate!Quote:
Originally Posted by anon361
-
11-02-11, 17:44An donDo you feel now that all years here with good standing count for nothing LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon361