Why has Sasha Eves thread in relatiion to the change in advertising rates been removed?
Is this an attempt to hide blatant overcharging of Girls for advertising?
Thread removed
Printable View
-
15-10-09, 19:38berThread removed
-
15-10-09, 19:51lutherGullible as ever..
But still happy to help......
Have a read of this.......
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...d-removed.html<<<<<Link...... -
15-10-09, 19:55berSpeedWell i must compliment them on the speed with which this was removed pity the false profilesQuote:
Originally Posted by ber
dont leave so fast. The Bottom line here is there is an attempt to squeeze as much money as
they can from the girls what has happened here is that a touring escort is no longer allowed advertise using the monthly rate of 250 but has to go on the weekly rate of 100 per week
For a girl on a month long tour this is an added cost of 150
Already earlier this year girls were stopped splitting their weeks advertising eg a girl
works 3 days this week say 4 days next week she will have to pay for 2 full weeks
advertising. This is really ripping off a partime lady etc So Guys us punters arent only ones being ripped off.
In current climate with ladies doing their bit to get in line with the economy, this just
stinks of greed nothing else -
15-10-09, 19:57berTo helpWell i did say u were helpful,Quote:
Originally Posted by luther
-
15-10-09, 22:05Anna23Same with me. This touring thingy would just become too expensive for me, compared to staying In Dublin and then all the lovely gentlemen outside dublin would never get the chance to meet me:(Quote:
Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe
-
15-10-09, 22:59jessie
BER It's a private issue between girls and E-I, that's why it has been removed from public view.
Jessie -
16-10-09, 12:36dubdavewell said Ber. you are right in that is was an attempt to hide overcharing of the girls . i know and have spoken to a number of ladies, some of who are personal friends that this charge only came up last week as they have been only charged $250 for a month for the last number of years. the ladies on this site need clients to stand up and get there voices heard as i know this new charge will mean that some ladies will struggle to pay it and even cause major hardship for them . i am speaking from a person who has a personal friend in the business and knew that this lady is struggle as it is to pay bills and that this new charge of $400 a month will proberly be the death of her. not all ladies are earning great money at this . so please support the ladies and demand that EI charge them $250 a month as they have been for the last number of years and not this new RIP of price. we have a say on this website as we are the ones who have made it number one on goggle by logging onto it. please show your support by post here to show that you disagree with EI imposing this new charge on the ladies.Quote:
Originally Posted by ber
GO ON SHOW YOUR SUPPORT. DUBDAVE:mad: -
16-10-09, 14:00StewieWithout getting into the actual amounts 250 or 400 and whether either of them are fair all I will say is that it seems reasonable to me that girls that tour would pay something more than girls that are in the same place for the whole month.Quote:
Originally Posted by dubdave
Obviously if a girl is at 6 or more locations over the course of the month there is more work to be done updating her profile on time to indicate where she is at the moment compared to the static girl who they only have to upload the ad once.
That said I'm not saying 400 is a fair amount or even 250 for the static girls just that there is a difference in the amount of work and it would seem obvious and fair that the static girls are not subsidising the extra work involved in updating a touring profile..