*Name Removed* - Dickhead abusing dirty agressive his number *phone number removed*

Hi everyone,

Someone who is a very digusting person, time waster just came to my house to only do verbal abuse. 3 friends of mine in Dublin has seen him and he has done the same. Please share his number for everybody's protection.

*phone number removed*

You fucking idiot!!
It is totally unacceptable to post someone's number on here for any reason!! If someone hurts or threatens to hurt you physically then contact the Guards, if not then chalk it up to experience ............... you should be banned from this site for posting that number!!

Paws

To be fair Paws, its a Warning Section. She was 'warning' people. There are no guidelines etc. It might not have been a great experience and we've all heard of situations that turned nasty. Number should be deleted alright, or maybe change last three digits or something.

It's totally against the rules to post a number in this or any other section of the website ................ she/he could be lying and trying to get back at a guy who didn't show up or left because he wasn't happy with escort in real life compared to her/his pics.
Either way it is totally out of order posting a number with no evidence and that's why the rules say no posting numbers ............

Paws

Yes I Did Visit This Her But I Was Not Comfortable With Her And Decided To Leave Thats All. She Asked Me To Compensate Her And I Refused And Said Sorry For Wasting Her Time And Left . Also I Have Not Done This To Anyone Else Before . If I Dont Like Someone Or Am Not Comfortable With Them Amd Tell Them So Can I Not Just Leave . Its Also My Time Thats Been Wasted. Please Also Delete Number Administrator. Also Email Me Administrator If You Want Confirmation Of This . Thanks

Hi,

Number removed as requested by rebel333.

latintgirl it is NOT ACCEPTABLE to post numbers like this. Please do not do it again.

Pat

ok Pat,

you just did something very wrong. You are just encouraging this guys to carry on their fun with the escorts that advertise for you. I would advise you to be more serious about this. Garda can go after you for putting people at risk.



The minute i told this client that his number would be disclosed for everyone's safety, he knew that this would happen. And that is the reason he is under the rebel333 nick name, again insulting me by calling me idiot (another demonstration of his agressive personality).


You dont need to worry PAWS, your number has been disclosed not only here. Better you dont get any near me again or you will be in serious trouble. More people know about you and my camera got you too. Be smarter to who you play with.

You are a sick twisted idiot LatinGuy ................ I wouldn't come near you even if I was into shemales!! Convincing???? That's a joke!!!
If you do indeed have one of my many numbers (which is impossible as I am only into real women!) then PM it to me .............. in other words put up or shut up you freak!!
You are just pissed off because you have been shown here as a liar .......... that poor guy who's number you posted just because he didn't want to stay??
I am sure you will be out of business in this country fairly soon after doing that to a punter ............... count yourself lucky that you didn't post a guy's number who didn't go back and smash your teeth in for doing it!!
Pat should ban you from ever adverising here again in my opinion ...........

Paws

ps No disrespect to any Tv/Ts's who escort or to any of the punters who visit them ................... the world is for everyone, each to their own and all that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by latintgirl

ok Pat,

you just did something very wrong. You are just encouraging this guys to carry on their fun with the escorts that advertise for you. I would advise you to be more serious about this. Garda can go after you for putting people at risk.

---

Latintgirl, I most certainly did not do wrong by removing his number.

A public message board like this is not the place to publish anyone's private phone number.

I do not encourage abuse of escorts. I do take abuse of escorts very seriously. And I am offended by your accusations towards me here.

As for the Garda, if anyone is going to be in trouble with the Garda here it will be you I suspect.

Last time I was talking to the Garda about a person that published somebody else's private phone number on an escort message board without their permission they told me they prosecute people who do this under section 10 of the Non Fatal Offence Against the Person Act, 1997.

Here you go...

Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997

Harassment. 10.—(1) Any person who, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, by any means including by use of the telephone, harasses another by persistently following, watching, pestering, besetting or communicating with him or her, shall be guilty of an offence.

(2) For the purposes of this section a person harasses another where—

( a ) he or she, by his or her acts intentionally or recklessly, seriously interferes with the other's peace and privacy or causes alarm, distress or harm to the other, and

( b ) his or her acts are such that a reasonable person would realise that the acts would seriously interfere with the other's peace and privacy or cause alarm, distress or harm to the other.

(3) Where a person is guilty of an offence under subsection (1), the court may, in addition to or as an alternative to any other penalty, order that the person shall not, for such period as the court may, specify, communicate by any means with the other person or that the person shall not approach within such distance as the court shall specify of the place of residence or employment of the other person.

(4) A person who fails to comply with the terms of an order under subsection (3) shall be guilty of an offence.

(5) If on the evidence the court is not satisfied that the person should be convicted of an offence under subsection (1), the court may nevertheless make an order under subsection (3) upon an application to it in that behalf if, having regard to the evidence, the court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice so to do.

(6) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—

( a ) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,500 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both, or

( b ) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years or to both.


This is what you can be charged with if you post anyone's private phone number on this website without their permission.


The victim goes to the Garda, the Garda contact us, we hand over your IP address, the Garda arrive at your door...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

Here you go...

Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997

Harassment. 10.—(1) Any person who, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, by any means including by use of the telephone, harasses another by persistently following, watching, pestering, besetting or communicating with him or her, shall be guilty of an offence.

(2) For the purposes of this section a person harasses another where—

( a ) he or she, by his or her acts intentionally or recklessly, seriously interferes with the other's peace and privacy or causes alarm, distress or harm to the other, and

( b ) his or her acts are such that a reasonable person would realise that the acts would seriously interfere with the other's peace and privacy or cause alarm, distress or harm to the other.

(3) Where a person is guilty of an offence under subsection (1), the court may, in addition to or as an alternative to any other penalty, order that the person shall not, for such period as the court may, specify, communicate by any means with the other person or that the person shall not approach within such distance as the court shall specify of the place of residence or employment of the other person.

(4) A person who fails to comply with the terms of an order under subsection (3) shall be guilty of an offence.

(5) If on the evidence the court is not satisfied that the person should be convicted of an offence under subsection (1), the court may nevertheless make an order under subsection (3) upon an application to it in that behalf if, having regard to the evidence, the court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice so to do.

(6) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—

( a ) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,500 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both, or

( b ) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years or to both.


This is what you can be charged with if you post anyone's private phone number on this website without their permission.


The victim goes to the Garda, the Garda contact us, we hand over your IP address, the Garda arrive at your door...

---

By the time shes finished reading and understanding all of that,it would be time for her realise............

I love it when you get rough Pat,
Westside.:)

go back to school, because i cannot understand you!!!

I'm afraid I have to be rough when it comes to escorts posting clients' private info here or clients posting escorts' private info here. It is not ok, and the people that do it, whether they be escorts or clients, need to understand that I will go to whatever lengths are necessary to stop it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

I'm afraid I have to be rough when it comes to escorts posting clients' private info here or clients posting escorts' private info here. It is not ok, and the people that do it, whether they be escorts or clients, need to understand that I will go to whatever lengths are necessary to stop it.

---

why dont you go to whatever length it takes to stop dishonest adverts ,profiles,claims???

Just wondering,
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by westside

why dont you go to whatever length it takes to stop dishonest adverts ,profiles,claims???

Just wondering,
Westside.

---

We do our best there, but unfortunately the nature of this business is that - however hard we try - there are always going to be some problems with escorts being dishonest in their advertising here.

The only way we could ever guarantee there was no false escort info here is if we personally controlled all the escorts on this website, but we don't and never will do that, because we are an escort DIRECTORY not an escort AGENCY.

Also, posting personal info of someone here without their consent is arguably a lot more more serious than an escort being dishonest in her ad I think.

Of course it is annoying that you can look at escort ad here, then go see the escort and find she is not everything she said she was, but this experience will probably not destroy your life.

Having your personal information published here can cause massive personal problems for people though, problems more serious than having your time etc wasted.

Pat x

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

We do our best there, but unfortunately the nature of this business is that - however hard we try - there are always going to be some problems with escorts being dishonest in their advertising here.
Pat x

---

Patricia, are you saying you find it hard to question the authenticity of the pics in these profiles :confused:

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2492/...sh-escort.html

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2002/...sh-escort.html

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2008/...sh-escort.html

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2037/...sh-escort.html (these look like stills taken from a tv)

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2007/...sh-escort.html (more stills?)

https://www.escort-ireland.com/1920/...sh-escort.html

https://www.escort-ireland.com/2155/...sh-escort.html (2 different girls, just look at the boobs)


https://www.escort-ireland.com/2066/...sh-escort.html


Its actually that bad its almost funny, and these were just from the 1st page of the "dublin escorts with verified pics" lol

As the man says, you could'nt make it up :eek:

Hi,

All of these girls have done something (like take a photo of themselves holding a peice of paper saying 'E-I') in order to verify they do look like the person in the photos they have submitted. Can you (or anyone else) point us in the direction of evidence that any of these photos are fake? I will ask our advertising department to look into all these cases anyway, but some proof photos are fake and mistakes have been made would be very welcome if this is the case.

Thanks

Pat x

Hi, Patricia, Cable87 here.



I was just reading the thread and commentary about how the girls send in photos to you to 'verify' that they look like the girls that we punters see in the photos that end up on the site. Well, I'm not sure what level of scrutiny you subject these photos to, but I must say that there are still some photos getting by that are obvious fakes, and there is at least one such photo up on the site RIGHT NOW.



'Brenda', a girl claiming to be Portugese, whose listing is up right now for Dublin City, is using photos of porn actress Amy Reid with the face blurred out as if they were her own photos! A simple Google search of the name Amy Reid will quickly and easily confirm this; I imagine you might be able to find the EXACT SAME photos if you just spent a few minutes!


And the ironic part is that 'Brenda's photos are currently listed as being 'Verified' under your own system! Now I can understand if girls don't always like to have their faces or other features that could make them easily distinguisable from others up on the site; I have always known and respected the ladies right to discretion and privacy. But using such obviously fake photos, and then letting them get by your screening process so easily, I wonder how easily a fake photo might actually get by you folks. All this is combined with the fact that'Brenda' has opted-out of the review system, thus not allowing for others to warn each other that her photos are obvious fakes. Please remedy this if you can, and please do keep a look out for such obvious fakes in the future.



Kindly,


Cable87

Hi, Patricia, Cable87 here.



I was just reading the thread and commentary about how the girls send in photos to you to 'verify' that they look like the girls that we punters see in the photos that end up on the site. Well, I'm not sure what level of scrutiny you subject these photos to, but I must say that there are still some photos getting by that are obvious fakes, and there is at least one such photo up on the site RIGHT NOW.



'Brenda', a girl claiming to be Portugese, whose listing is up right now for Dublin City, is using photos of porn actress Amy Reid with the face blurred out as if they were her own photos! A simple Google search of the name Amy Reid will quickly and easily confirm this; I imagine you might be able to find the EXACT SAME photos if you just spent a few minutes!


And the ironic part is that 'Brenda's photos are currently listed as being 'Verified' under your own system! Now I can understand if girls don't always like to have their faces or other features that could make them easily distinguisable from others up on the site; I have always known and respected the ladies right to discretion and privacy. But using such obviously fake photos, and then letting them get by your screening process so easily, I wonder how easily a fake photo might actually get by you folks. All this is combined with the fact that'Brenda' has opted-out of the review system, thus not allowing for others to warn each other that her photos are obvious fakes. Please remedy this if you can, and please do keep a look out for such obvious fakes in the future.



Kindly,


Cable87

Thanks Cable87.

Needless to say Brenda's photos have been removed.

Those photos looked totally fake to me the moment I looked at them, so how Sarah/Natasha (our advertising staff) decided they were genuine I don't know.

I'm guessing they never intended to verify them genuine, but in a simple case of human error did so.

I'll bring this thread to their attention.

Thanks

Pat x

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

Thanks Cable87.

Needless to say Brenda's photos have been removed.

Those photos looked totally fake to me the moment I looked at them, so how Sarah/Natasha (our advertising staff) decided they were genuine I don't know.

I'm guessing they never intended to verify them genuine, but in a simple case of human error did so.

I'll bring this thread to their attention.

Thanks

Pat x

---

they are making alot of errors so. A buddy of mine was at Upmarket Models last week. He says that they are now 170/half hour. So Sweetie, i was in there in 2005 and 2006 .In 2005 they were 130/half hour, 2006 150/half hour, now 170/half hour.Why are they advertising at 110 /half hour????Should say Starting at 110??Now that would make sense.

My point here is you went to great lengths to praise Sexy Sirens some time back.Yet they advertise their real prices.You allow their competitors to advertise a false cheaper price.So would this be screwing your customers????Sounds like it to me.

Fair is fair love.Sexy Sirens are a genuine agency advertising genuine prices, Upmarket Models are a genuine agency advertising false prices and favourites at that.

Need i say more??
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by westside

they are making alot of errors so. A buddy of mine was at Upmarket Models last week. He says that they are now 170/half hour. So Sweetie, i was in there in 2005 and 2006 .In 2005 they were 130/half hour, 2006 150/half hour, now 170/half hour.Why are they advertising at 110 /half hour????Should say Starting at 110??Now that would make sense.

My point here is you went to great lengths to praise Sexy Sirens some time back.Yet they advertise their real prices.You allow their competitors to advertise a false cheaper price.So would this be screwing your customers????Sounds like it to me.

Fair is fair love.Sexy Sirens are a genuine agency advertising genuine prices, Upmarket Models are a genuine agency advertising false prices and favourites at that.

Need i say more??
Westside.

---

https://www.escort-ireland.com/1620/Mariska/review.html


Westside.

I will send Sexy Sirens a PM asking if their prices are correct. I expect to get a reply because I find Sexy Sirens are professional.

I don't have an email for Upmarket Models but I will ask Sarah to check their prices with them by phone on Monday.

Sorry I realise now I misunderstood this thread. I thought you were saying sexy sirens prices were wrong, but that is not what you are saying is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

Sorry I realise now I misunderstood this thread. I thought you were saying sexy sirens prices were wrong, but that is not what you are saying is it?

---

Thanks for failing to confuse me.

Im so silly and innocent,
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

I don't have an email for Upmarket Models but I will ask Sarah to check their prices with them by phone on Monday.

---

Sarah "hello Sarah from EI here"

UM "hello how are you"?

Sarah "great , we are just checking to see if your prices are right?

UM "Oh yes they are"

Sarah "thank you, have a nice day"

UM "many happy returns"


Amazing,
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

Sorry I realise now I misunderstood this thread. I thought you were saying sexy sirens prices were wrong, but that is not what you are saying is it?

---

I not saying that Upmarket Models are unprofessional.There are way worse out there.Upmarket offer a good service and i would reccommend them but price wise they are taking the piss (you know why the prices have gone,so do i).

I wont be around tommorrow to read your answer and the day after either.I dont feel i have anything to contribute here.You would be better off for a start.to be honest the place is the same old stuff.

Take it easy and hey stick up the comp prize money?????????What comps??;)


Sincerely,
West.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patricia

I will send Sexy Sirens a PM asking if their prices are correct. I expect to get a reply because I find Sexy Sirens are professional.

---

They dont answer PMs, it says so in their signature, or at least it did a while back. Maybe they started reading them when they took it off their signature :rolleyes: