sexonwheels - Banned On IIE

I am aware that some members on here are also members of IIE (Hiway, Alec, Notatwork,espensen etc). You will be therefore most likely also be aware of the recent debate surrounding sexonwheels and coffee's signature.

I have linked the two relevant threads. Please read to conclusion of each and feel free to discuss the issue herein as I am sure that it will be regarded as relevant and therefore of interest to you all.
**** url removed *******

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Banned User

I am aware that some members on here are also members of IIE (Hiway, Alec, Notatwork,espensen

---

Know u now some one else:D

nbt

Hey Banned user, I read those posts that you atached from IIE, thank you for those as i did not realise that there was a forum on that website and it read very good, I could not believe that Leah and Popti actually participate on it and appear to be regular users, Leah is a class act, I am sure EI wont be too happy you advertising for the other site, but hey I am signing up today as it does seem to be a good forum

In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed

It may be that she might not have a wheelchair accessible apartment...also i do remember posts on here about a con man using his disability to con girls....so im not surprised by these posts.

JL

Having read the threads, I have to say that I agree totally with Sexonwheels. I think that Coffee's signature is gratuitously offensive and I am surprised that she seems to be allowed to maintain it. I have to say that Coffee seems like the kind of escort that I would avoid like the plague.

I have to say that this whole IIE thing extremely disappointing. We need a strong IIE to keep E-I on their toes and IIE seem to be in self destruct mode for years now while E-I is getting more dominant all the time. It seems to me that the basic format of IIE works reasonably well but they seem to be losing advertising from all but the older UK escorts. Does anyone know what is going on?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adogwithabone

Having read the threads, I have to say that I agree totally with Sexonwheels. I think that Coffee's signature is gratuitously offensive and I am surprised that she seems to be allowed to maintain it. I have to say that Coffee seems like the kind of escort that I would avoid like the plague.

I have to say that this whole IIE thing extremely disappointing. We need a strong IIE to keep E-I on their toes and IIE seem to be in self destruct mode for years now while E-I is getting more dominant all the time. It seems to me that the basic format of IIE works reasonably well but they seem to be losing advertising from all but the older UK escorts. Does anyone know what is going on?

---

What i find kinda amusing is that there isnt a word about her sig but he got banned for 2 weeks
for hijacking a thread(be no one left here if that was done:(:()
There is no need whatsoever for that sig as there is already an option on her profile which
says whether she is disabled friendly or not.
Now it cant be inconviencing her that much even to answer wheelchair users and say no
she dosent see them as i cant imagine that the numbers ringing would be huge
Ihave to agree with EP while the discretion who she sees is always and rightly so with
the lady the manner in which she announces it shouldnt be such as to offend people

I think sexonwheels was treated unfairly. Her signature is a more serious offense than him hijacking a thread. He has every right to be angry about it. She shouldn't have put that in her signature. All she had to do on her ad was put a no on where it says wheelchair accessability. An escort has every right to see who she likes but that's not the way to do things. I don't think she even tours here now as her last tour was advertised for 2007. Maybe I should go over and give Jake a lesson on modding. I would've removed the signature. That's me banned now for 2 weeks :D

IIE used to be the dominant site for me but I hardly ever look at it now. It's like a ghost town and EI is now, by far, the superior site in every way.


:D

theres nobody offended least of all myself if an escort doesn't want to see a person in a wheelchair I've never had that experience myself but this has nothing to do with that, it has everything to do with other motives this 'escort' has only her own miserable self knows that, how on earth she was allowed to get away with it truly beggars belief It most certainly wouldn't have happened on this website....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed

---

you cant compare her sig with what your comparing it to ffs.I had a look at her sig and to be honest i cant see the big problem at all.She simply states she wont see wheelchair users.Whats wrong with that?she isnt mocking anyone,it cant be referred to in any other way (if she said she wont see ppl with disabilities ,it would mean differently).How does a person refer to someone in a wheelchair so?

She could have her reasons for it such as not having wheelchair access etc.Its her business and her perogative.

Having said all that i just checked her sig and didnt read the threads because to be honest i couldnt give a toss about it.If she mocks anyone in a wheelchair then that is a different ballgame but stating it in her sig isnt a nasty by any means.Having said that i cant see the point in banning a guy who had issue with it either.

Westside.


PS by the way.If you had said that "you wouldnt see any black ppl then there is nothing wrong with that.Im not going into this whole discrimination stuff because i think its being beaten to death for far too long by now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Westsidex

you cant compare her sig with what your comparing it to ffs.I had a look at her sig and to be honest i cant see the big problem at all.She simply states she wont see wheelchair users.Whats wrong with that?she isnt mocking anyone,it cant be referred to in any other way (if she said she wont see ppl with disabilities ,it would mean differently).How does a person refer to someone in a wheelchair so?

She could have her reasons for it such as not having wheelchair access etc.Its her business and her perogative.

Having said all that i just checked her sig and didnt read the threads because to be honest i couldnt give a toss about it.If she mocks anyone in a wheelchair then that is a different ballgame but stating it in her sig isnt a nasty by any means.Having said that i cant see the point in banning a guy who had issue with it either.

Westside.


PS by the way.If you had said that "you wouldnt see any black ppl then there is nothing wrong with that.Im not going into this whole discrimination stuff because i think its being beaten to death for far too long by now.

---

Its the usual rubbish coming out of u - absolute tripe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

Its the usual rubbish coming out of u - absolute tripe

---

Whats more tripe.

Someone giving an honest opinion on a heated issue or

"I wanna pull me Mickey off"
"my gf left me"
"i have a pain in my head"
"i just met a girl.I only know her five hours but should i tell her i go to escorts?"

I could go on.

By the way,shoot yourself.That will solve all of your issues.

Hugs and kisses,
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sexonwheels

I sill stand my what I have said, and I will do

---

What a load of BS.......

First of all she should have delete or edited it herself when you contacted her about it..........

I think it shows utter contempt by her the way it carried on and I think you have been unfairly treated as a result.......

A simple solution would have been for a moderator to edit her sig to read "cannot see disabled people"..........

Not that I think it need to be said in a sig anyway but I would have thought it would have been the better compromise............

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sexonwheels

I wanted to firstly say I haven’t been banned for life its just a two week suspension, its got nothing whatsoever to do with me high jacking a thread its just designed so that in a week or so everything will blow over and be forgotten about, sadly this isn’t going to be the case

Secondly I want to thank those punters who have backed me on this issue.

Thirdly I don’t know what or if anything has been added over on IIE about it as its pointless for me to read it at the moment as I cant log-in so there’s no point in reading it further getting annoyed at some of the rubbish that’ll be written about it and not being able to respond to it.

Finally I want to say I have NEVER said that an escort doesn’t have the right to see whoever she does or does not want to see, that’s it end off, its her right of course but to have this on her signature to be seen by everyone every single time she posts on the board is just down right disgraceful.

Many, many times in the past I’ve contacted an escort via telephone or email/PM and asked about appointments only to be told they’re not wheelchair friendly and that’s been it, end off, move on, forget about it, but this method however is just unacceptable.

I’d held my lip for a very long time, years in fact, but enough was enough I felt this week as she’d been posting all roads and direction on the board ramming it down people like myself’s throat.

There is no way on this wide earthly world an escort would get away with posting on her signature she wont see black people for example, there would be uproar from both punters and the board mods, this however seems to be accepted.

At the end of the day, I believe I should be getting praised from IIE for breathing a bit of life and debate back into what is nothing more than a dying board. lol

I sill stand my what I have said, and I will do

---

having read over it

i,d be on your side and agree with the signature issue.


i,d agree too that starting a new thread would have been a better approach to dealing with the issue, even though most threads go off topic, anyway, (unfortunately important ones). then again real or fake boobs is a banter thread.


also referring sarcastically, even though you were provoked, to the disabled as gimps didnt help without having a united front first.


even so, a 2 week ban is ott, a moderator can usually sort thing out amicably by pm,s or with proper direction in a debate ime.



solidarity with sexonwheels

http://www.fogcityjournal.com/wordpr...solidarity.gif



bbj

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

theres nobody offended least of all myself if an escort doesn't want to see a person in a wheelchair I've never had that experience myself but this has nothing to do with that, it has everything to do with other motives this 'escort' has only her own miserable self knows that, how on earth she was allowed to get away with it truly beggars belief It most certainly wouldn't have happened on this website....

---

I agree with EP on this topic.
I rarely look at IIE but I know for sure that an escort on this site would never have been allowed to have a comment like that on her signature.
It is absolutely disgraceful.:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by luther

What a load of BS.......

First of all she should have delete or edited it herself when you contacted her about it..........

I think it shows utter contempt by her the way it carried on and I think you have been unfairly treated as a result.......

A simple solution would have been for a moderator to edit her sig to read "cannot see disabled people"..........

Not that I think it need to be said in a sig anyway but I would have thought it would have been the better compromise............

---

Obviously it never occurred to IIE to do that.:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by westcorklad

Obviously it never occurred to IIE to do that.:(

---

Its no different than ticking a box.Its pretty much the same thing.In her sig she didnt mock wheelchair users,simply stated that she wont see them ,the very same as if she ticked a box.Its a business and if it were possible to discriminate it wouldnt stick legally.

If she went on to mock disabled ppl then thats wrong and she should be booted for that but as far as her sig goes,i dont think the mods there could ask her to remove it and make it stick anymore than the facility in ticking a box.

Thats one thing i find alot in business of all sorts.Ppl come along and say they are paying for this or that and ppl switch to the personal level with stuff.Business is business and if she paid and no rule existes as to what she said in the sig then they couldnt make the removal stick.

Funny though how you agree with Ex P who used the word he used in his example.Even though it was only an example ,he still referred to black ppl by this name.I, even in the midst of my tripe never did that.

Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed

---

You know i said nothing earlier because to be honest im busy today but its funny how you criticise her (whetehr right or wrong) and then actaully give an example by stating probably the most offensive name that could be thought up for a black person.

your not on meds or anything are you?
Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Westsidex

Its no different than ticking a box.Its pretty much the same thing.

---

If it was then why didn't she just tic the box???

IMO her advertising/advising of the fact that she couldn't, wouldn't or doesn't cater for disabled people was over the top............

I think it has been edited again with "so please stop asking" added in.............

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Westsidex

You know i said nothing earlier because to be honest im busy today but its funny how you criticise her (whetehr right or wrong) and then actaully give an example by stating probably the most offensive name that could be thought up for a black person.

your not on meds or anything are you?
Westside.

---

why do u keep going on your making an ass as usual, to clarify(:rolleyes:) shes wrong, if someone called her n****r would she like it being mixed race its an insult comparable to the one she made thats my point, got it? don't try to make more out of it because your bored now fuck off I'm watching the X Factor.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

why do u keep going on your making an ass as usual, to clarify(:rolleyes:) shes wrong, if someone called her n****r would she like it being mixed race its an insult comparable to the one she made thats my point, got it? don't try to make more out of it because your bored now fuck off I'm watching the X Factor.......

---

Brother e.p., I realise that you are purely using the n word as an example to illustrate your point in this debate. However, there are black members of this site, escorts and punters, how could take offence if they saw a racist term for black people being bandied about here. Can you please refrain from using this term and maybe use n-word or n***rs instead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by carlos marvado

Brother e.p., I realise that you are purely using the n word as an example to illustrate your point in this debate. However, there are black members of this site, escorts and punters, how could take offence if they saw a racist term for black people being bandied about here. Can you please refrain from using this term and maybe use n-word or n***rs instead.

---

of course I will refrain Carlos please leave me alone rightnow I have my mickey in my hand....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

of course I will refrain Carlos please leave me alone rightnow I have my mickey in my hand....

---

LMAO.......I'd never have guessed. :D:D:D

Shit I've just realised the football is on right now......e.p., I hope you're not playing with yourself while watching the Irish playing with the Cypriots? :eek::eek::eek:

Eamo just said "There's no hiding place for Trappatoni right now". Maybe Trappatoni should start playing with himself......even at his age, chances are he would still get a result. :D:D:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by carlos marvado

LMAO.......I'd never have guessed. :D:D:D

Shit I've just realised the football is on right now......e.p., I hope you're not playing with yourself while watching the Irish playing with the Cypriots? :eek::eek::eek:

Eamo just said "There's no hiding place for Trappatoni right now". Maybe Trappatoni should start playing with himself......even at his age, chances are he would still get a result. :D:D:D

---

i think the writing was on the wall ,earlier in the week when we were concerned about the fitness of st ledger . Is that they best we can pick ...........ffs , and dont get me started on the centre midfield



nbt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by luther

If it was then why didn't she just tic the box???

IMO her advertising/advising of the fact that she couldn't, wouldn't or doesn't cater for disabled people was over the top............

I think it has been edited again with "so please stop asking" added in.............

---

it pretty much is the same in a business sense.Its like a girl saying in her sig that she performs a certain service or stating a certain fact in her sig.Its pretty much the same thing.

Westside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by experienced punter

why do u keep going on your making an ass as usual, to clarify(:rolleyes:) shes wrong, if someone called her n****r would she like it being mixed race its an insult comparable to the one she made thats my point, got it? don't try to make more out of it because your bored now fuck off I'm watching the X Factor.......

---

allow me to clarify.Your so thick that a national holiday should be declared on this day annually.A day of Appreiciation ,not for you ,but for others, in a way of thanksgiving.Thanking the lord or whoever they like for being blessed with intellegence unlike some poor souls such as yourself.

That word you used to compare would be considered a racist word and could insult someone of black origin.It doesnt matter if your using it as an eg or not,its the fact that you mention it just like you still imply it here in this post.

fool,
Westside.