Creative Writer Rachel Moran On TV 3's Ireland AM

Yes, the Creative writer appeared with Jill Meagher's husband to support the 'We Don't Buy it' campaign aimed at marginalizing male punters in anticipation of the upcoming change in the law!
Rachel got the easiest ride of her life (at least. she now has had at least one ride! :D) from an ill informed Sinead Glesson and Mark Cagney who swallowed her spew more avidly than any hungry nympho swallowing cum!
Sad to see that Jill Meagher's husband who obviously went through such pain on the murder of his wife by a psychotic with a history of attacks on sex workers, doesn't realize the common sense that this insane law can only increase such attacks!
Rachel, who by the way is getting noticeably fatter (grant money?), pointed out that she dislikes the term 'sex worker' preferring instead a term thought to her by a NY lawyer -'prostituted women' as prostitution is the only crime that blames the victims! - How insane is that, it's TORLER NUTTERS who are criminalizing sex work further and doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of sex workers, indeed the exact opposite! Oddly enough the creative writer doesn't realize that men and transgender people can also be sex workers!
The 'interview' was around 8.20 this morning, sorry I cannot get a direct link!

http://www.quotesnquips.com/wp-conte...agreatmany.png

Yeah, she looks and acts like a stupid Reformed Bitch??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Libertarian

Yes, the Creative writer appeared with Jill Meagher's husband to support the 'We Don't Buy it' campaign aimed at marginalizing male punters in anticipation of the upcoming change in the law!
Rachel got the easiest ride of her life (at least. she now has had at least one ride! :D) from an ill informed Sinead Glesson and Mark Cagney who swallowed her spew more avidly than any hungry nympho swallowing cum!
Sad to see that Jill Meagher's husband who obviously went through such pain on the murder of his wife by a psychotic with a history of attacks on sex workers, doesn't realize the common sense that this insane law can only increase such attacks!
Rachel, who by the way is getting noticeably fatter (grant money?), pointed out that she dislikes the term 'sex worker' preferring instead a term thought to her by a NY lawyer -'prostituted women' as prostitution is the only crime that blames the victims! - How insane is that, it's TORLER NUTTERS who are criminalizing sex work further and doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of sex workers, indeed the exact opposite! Oddly enough the creative writer doesn't realize that men and transgender people can also be sex workers!
The 'interview' was around 8.20 this morning, sorry I cannot get a direct link!

---

A very scary lady. She describes herself as a 14 year old drug addicted 'Knacker', failed by her family, social services and friends, who willingly sells the use of her vagina for money and then decides that it is all the customers fault. Of course, she is partly right. Any man who abuses any woman or has sex with underage prostitutes should be punished even if the girl is willing. Paying for something wrong does not make it right. By the same token, paying for something right should not make it wrong.

The most infuriating thing about this woman is that she should dare compare herself to the hundreds of amazing escorts that I have met or that the low-lifes which is all that she could attract in any way represent the vast majority of men who visit escorts. How many abused, under-aged, drug addicted 'knackers' have any of you guys met?? She represents only the lowest and vilest of this business which we would all like to see done away with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mexicanpete

A very scary lady. She describes herself as a 14 year old drug addicted 'Knacker', failed by her family, social services and friends, who willingly sells the use of her vagina for money and then decides that it is all the customers fault. Of course, she is partly right. Any man who abuses any woman or has sex with underage prostitutes should be punished even if the girl is willing. Paying for something wrong does not make it right. By the same token, paying for something right should not make it wrong.

The most infuriating thing about this woman is that she should dare compare herself to the hundreds of amazing escorts that I have met or that the low-lifes which is all that she could attract in any way represent the vast majority of men who visit escorts. How many abused, under-aged, drug addicted 'knackers' have any of you guys met?? She represents only the lowest and vilest of this business which we would all like to see done away with.

---

Well if she started sex work at 14 years old, at that stage, she would only ever encounter scum of the earth paedos as clients and they were committing what was and is quite correctly deemed a serious criminal act by abusing her!
Also, curiously enough, street sex workers in Dublin would have known each other very well, yet absolutely none from that era, seem to remember her working as a sex worker at all!
Is anybody seriously telling me that no street worker then or now would not have assisted a 14 year old child let alone not remember one!

She probably blames the drug dealers too? :banghead:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by warmcome

She probably blames the drug dealers too? :banghead:

---

I have not read the book but it would appear that the only people to blame for her situation were the clients that she offered herself to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Libertarian

Well if she started sex work at 14 years old, at that stage, she would only ever encounter scum of the earth paedos as clients and they were committing what was and is quite correctly deemed a serious criminal act by abusing her!
Also, curiously enough, street sex workers in Dublin would have known each other very well, yet absolutely none from that era, seem to remember her working as a sex worker at all!
Is anybody seriously telling me that no street worker then or now would not have assisted a 14 year old child let alone not remember one!

---

This is a 'bandwagon' book. She is simply cashing in on the current hysteria. 'It took me ten years to write it' roughly translates as 'I have just thought of how I could rip off my former clients even more by writing exaggerated stories about them'.

I wonder how much of her story is actually true and how much is 'creative' writing. Investigating her story would be a good project for a journalist if any real journalists existed. Unfortunately, what passes for journalists these days are all writing fashion pieces about 'the emperor's clothes'.

She had a bad time. She was isolated then come Nun torch a lit showing her the way.
You'd almost think she takes it personally that her expirience wasn't that of every sex worker
Were she to face the truth would mean she'd have to elavate herself from Career-Victimn into a Woman with a modicon of self-responsibility.