rule change

Printable View

13-09-16, 10:55
Zander

rule change

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered
13-09-16, 11:03
Ass Hunter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zander

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

Most ? Please explain yourself. A certain amount of "unverified" photos yes but these girls are innocent till proven guilty so an unverified photo does not equal a "fake" photo.
I have seen profiles of girls with verified photos but someone has reported them as fake and i know the girl and have visited her and it is her in the photos.
The team here are doing a great job under very difficult circumstances give them a break.
13-09-16, 11:03
FatBastard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zander

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

When you stay you encourage the behaviour. If people walked away every time a bait and switch happened, guess what? It wouldn't be profitable to do bait and switch any more.
13-09-16, 11:28
LuckyLu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zander

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
Leave review.
We will publish it.
13-09-16, 12:27
willie wacker

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ass Hunter

Most ? Please explain yourself. A certain amount of "unverified" photos yes but these girls are innocent till proven guilty so an unverified photo does not equal a "fake" photo.
I have seen profiles of girls with verified photos but someone has reported them as fake and i know the girl and have visited her and it is her in the photos.
The team here are doing a great job under very difficult circumstances give them a break.

Well said
All they have to do if they think the photo,s are fake is do a google search, if nothing come,s up then there is a good chance that the pics are not fake.
The longer you are on the boards/ punting the easier it become,s to see the fake profile,s
13-09-16, 12:46
Sexy Sandy 69

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zander

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

My photos are not fake, they are verified & I am as portrayed in the photos. I think that you will find that escorts who have been advertising for years, are indeed, the girl in the photos. In all fairness, there are girls out there advertising using genuine photos. It's not just the fake photo's that's the problem, there are a lot of girls using 'heavily photo shopped' photos. The heavily photo shopped photo's are easier to spot.

Sandy x
13-09-16, 12:58
LuckyLu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexy Sandy 69

My photos are not fake, they are verified & I am as portrayed in the photos. I think that you will find that escorts who have been advertising for years, are indeed, the girl in the photos. In all fairness, there are girls out there advertising using genuine photos. It's not just the fake photo's that's the problem, there are a lot of girls using 'heavily photo shopped' photos. The heavily photo shopped photo's are easier to spot.

Sandy x

That is very true.
And it is not possible for us to deem them as fake, if they are photo-shopped.
13-09-16, 13:10
MidlifeCrisis

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuckyLu

The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
Leave review.
We will publish it.

I never quite see the logic in this.

Reviews are attached to a profile - not a person. If someone experiences bait and switch on a profile, then a review that indicates that you may walk into bait and switch if you book on the profile is useful.

I have never walked, and never experienced bait and switch, but I have several times been uncertain in the first few minutes whether itt was the person in the photos - girls frequently look very different, especially those whose faces are concealed in the pictures. It is easy to imagine someone only being certain whether it was the girl pictured when they get a chance to look at the profile again later.

I don't see the down side of allowing reviews when someone stays. Honest escorts wouldn't get hurt, and clients would get helpful warnings.
13-09-16, 13:52
justfrank44

A problem that comes up with reporting fake pics is that. we report the fake, it gets taken down, and then within a few hours the same pics are in use by the same profile again. Why can the mods not keep any eye, Either physically or electronically on the profiles that have already been reported.?